City Council Meeting 7-10-01
Santa
Monica, California
ORDINANCE
NUMBER _____
(City Council Series)
AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF
SANTA MONICA ADDING CHAPTER 4.65 TO THE SANTA
MONICA
MUNICIPAL CODE CREATING MINIMUM WAGE REQUIREMENTS
APPLICABLE
TO BUSINESSES IN THE COASTAL ZONE AND
EXTENDED
DOWNTOWN CORE WITH GROSS RECEIPTS OVER
$5,000,000
AND TO THE CITY AND ITS SERVICE CONTRACTORS
WHEREAS, the public welfare requires wages
and benefits sufficient to ensure a decent and healthy life for workers and
their families; and
WHEREAS, many Santa Monica employers pay
wages so low as to imperil the public welfare; and
WHEREAS, many Santa Monica workers earn
wages insufficient to support themselves and their families; and
WHEREAS, many Santa Monica workers receive
no health care benefits and therefore cannot protect their own health and the
health of their families; and
WHEREAS, many Santa Monica workers cannot
participate in civic life or pursue educational, cultural and recreational
opportunities because they must work such long hours to meet their households= most basic needs; and
WHEREAS, workers who do not receive adequate
wages must rely upon federal, state and local public assistance and social
services funded by taxpayers and may never escape poverty; and
WHEREAS, workers who do not receive health
care benefits may be unable to maintain their own health or the health of their
children, may be forced to utilize publicly- funded health and emergency care
services, and may unintentionally imperil the health of others; and
WHEREAS, workers who do not have sufficient
income and time off work to participate in the civic affairs and to pursue
educational, cultural and recreational opportunities may become alienated from
their communities, their states and their nation; and
WHEREAS, minimum wage laws promote the
general welfare by ensuring that workers can support and care for their
families through their own efforts and without governmental intervention; and
WHEREAS, creating decent job opportunities
through minimum wage and benefit laws is a better way to protect individuals
and families than public assistance because the availability of decent job
opportunities fosters independence, self-reliance and family unity; and
WHEREAS, laws mandating or encouraging the
provision of health care benefits to workers promote the general welfare by
minimizing health risks to the general population and reducing the cost of
emergency and other health care to the taxpayers; and
WHEREAS, minimum wage and benefit laws also assure
workers the means and leisure to participate in civic life and pursue
educational and cultural opportunities and thereby strengthen the fabric of our
society; and
WHEREAS, minimum wage and benefit laws also
benefit employers and the economy as a whole by improving employee performance,
reducing employee turnover, lowering absenteeism, and thereby improving
productivity and the quality of the services provided by employees; and
WHEREAS, in recognition of these realities,
the federal government mandates the payment of a minimum wage; and
WHEREAS, in recognition of the fact that the
cost of living and other circumstances vary substantially through the United
States, federal law explicitly authorizes states and municipalities to set more
stringent wage standards than those established federally; and
WHEREAS, the State of California has
exercised its power to set a minimum wage higher than the minimum set by
federal law in part because the cost of living in California is higher than in
most states; and
WHEREAS, the California Legislature has
recognized that localities may need to set more stringent wage standards than
those set by state law and has therefore specifically authorized the adoption
of such standards in Labor Code Section 1205; and
WHEREAS, in Opinion Number 89-502, the
California Attorney General has recognized the power of local governments to
set wage requirements higher than those set by state law; and
WHEREAS, the federal minimum wage has
declined steadily in real dollars for two decades; and
WHEREAS, the California minimum wage has
also declined in real dollars; and
WHEREAS, the California minimum wage is
inadequate to meet the needs of workers in the Los Angeles region where the
cost of living is much higher than in most parts of the state; and
WHEREAS, housing costs in the region are
particularly high relative to most parts of California, and low-income workers
must therefore spend a disproportionate percentage of their income sheltering
themselves and their families; and
WHEREAS, disproportionately high housing
costs force workers to locate far from their jobs and spend long hours
traveling to and from work; and
WHEREAS, the taxpayers of the Los Angeles
region must pay the cost of meeting workers= needs through
the provision of social services because the state minimum wage is not adequate
to meet those needs; and
WHEREAS, a minimum wage standard which
condemns a full-time worker=s family to abject poverty is simply inadequate to
achieve the long-recognized and salutary goals of the minimum wage laws; and
WHEREAS, the inadequacy of the state minimum
wage is particularly detrimental to the public welfare in Santa Monica where
the cost of living is very high and where thousands of workers labor long hours
at very low-paying jobs; and
WHEREAS, the highest concentration of
low-income workers in Santa Monica is in the coastal zone and the extended
downtown core; and
WHEREAS, this same area is home to some of
the City=s largest and most profitable businesses, including
luxury hotels, gourmet restaurants and large, national retailers which can
afford to pay their employees decent wages and can pass the cost of paying
increased wages to consumers; and
WHEREAS, most workers in this area are heads
of household who bear primary responsibility for supporting their families; and
WHEREAS, eighty per cent of these workers
have incomes inadequate to meet their families= basic needs;
and
WHEREAS, the vast majority of these workers
have no private health insurance; and
WHEREAS, tourists staying in the hotels in this
area may pay more than $400.00 per night for their rooms, but the workers
changing their bedding and serving their food cannot support their own
families; and
WHEREAS, businesses in this area have reaped
the benefits of various City policies and investments; and
WHEREAS, the City has actively improved this
area through capital investments, operating expenditures, the promotion of
tourism and the adoption of policies which restrict growth and limit
competition among certain businesses; and
WHEREAS, these investments, expenditures and
policies have fostered huge profits for some businesses in the area which
employ large numbers of low-wage workers; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to adopt a
local requirement to effectuate the purposes of the federal and state minimum
wage law, to address the needs of workers, and to promote the public welfare;
and
WHEREAS, increasing the wages of low-wage
workers will help achieve Santa Monica=s sustainable city goals by helping low-wage workers
live closer to work, reducing commute distances, and facilitating use of public
transit; and
WHEREAS, the City Council also wishes to
protect local businesses and their employees by ensuring that no business
suffers economic hardship so severe as to render it nonviable as a result of
this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Council wishes to take all
possible action to address the problems caused by inadequate wages and
benefits, and Council therefore intends that the severance doctrine shall be
liberally applied to effectuate the policy served by this law,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SANTA MONICA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Chapter 4.65 is hereby added to
the Santa Monica Municipal Code to read as follows:
CHAPTER
4.65
LIVING
WAGE
Section 4.65.010.
Definitions.
Coastal Zone. That area bounded by the Pacific Ocean on the west,
by the City border on the south, on the north by the San Vicente Boulevard
centerline from the eastern border of the City to its intersection with the
norther City border and along the City border west to the Pacific Ocean, and on
the east by the Lincoln Boulevard centerline south of Pico Boulevard and Fourth
Street north of Pico Boulevard. Properties adjacent to the east side of Fourth
Street between Pico Boulevard and Colorado Boulevard are included within the
area defined by this subsection; otherwise the Fourth Street boundary shall be
at the centerline.
Extended
Downtown Core. That area bounded by
Ocean Avenue on the west, Wilshire Boulevard on the north, Fifth Street on the
east, and Colorado Boulevard on the south. Properties on both sides of the
boundary streets shall be included within this definition.
Employee. Any person who does not actually work as a manager,
supervisor, or confidential employee, and who is not required to possess an
occupational license.
Gross Receipts Threshold.
Gross receipts over $5 million per year which amount shall be adjusted annually
each July 1st, beginning in 2003 by an amount corresponding to the previous
year=s change in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage
Earners and Clerical Workers in Los Angeles County.
Health Benefit. A payment towards the provision of health care
benefits for Employees and their dependents in the amount of $1.75 per hour in
the first year that this Chapter is in effect, $2.50 per hour in the second
year that this Chapter is in effect, and thereafter adjusted annually each July
1st, beginning in 2004, by an amount corresponding to the previous
year=s change in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage
Earners and Clerical Workers in Los Angeles County.
Minimum Wage. A wage payment at an initial hourly rate of $10.50
per hour with Health Benefits or $12.25 per hour without Health Benefits. These
rates shall be adjusted annually each July 1st, beginning in 2003,
by an amount corresponding to the previous year=s change in
the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers in Los
Angeles County.
Section
4.65.020. Minimum Wage Payment Requirements.
The Minimum Wage
required by this Chapter shall be paid by:
(a) the City of
Santa Monica to all workers employed by the City;
(b) any contractor
or subcontractor working for the City of Santa Monica on a service contract to
workers performing the work on that contract;
(c) any private
person or private corporation doing business at a location in the Coastal Zone
or Extended Downtown Core with gross receipts over the Gross Receipts Threshold
at that location for the previous two years to Employees working at that
location. The gross receipts of a contractor, subcontractor, lessee or
sublessee received at that location for performing part of the business
activities of the private person or corporation shall be included in
determining whether the Gross Receipts Threshold is exceeded; and
(d) any
contractor, subcontractor, lessee or sublessee performing part of the business
activities of a private person or private corporation described in subsection
(c) to Employees doing that work during at least half of their work time.
Section
4.65.030. Exemption for Severe Economic Hardship.
An employer who
contends that compliance with this Chapter would constitute a severe economic
hardship may apply to the City Manager for a waiver applicable to all or part
of the employer=s work force. Criteria for determining hardship shall
include whether: (a) compliance with the requirements of this Chapter would
render the employer=s business nonviable; (b) the employer=s business depends for its viability upon young people and other
first-time workers who are employed on a seasonal basis; and (c) whether
granting a waiver would otherwise advance the policies underlying this Chapter.
The City Manager shall promulgate an Administrative Instruction establishing
specific criteria applicable to and procedures for processing hardship applications.
Said Administrative Instruction shall set forth information to be included on
the hardship application, procedures for filing and processing applications,
and procedures for administrative review by a City hearing examiner whose final
decision shall be subject to judicial review.
Section
4.65.040. Prohibitions Against Retaliation and Circumvention.
It shall be
unlawful for any employer or employer=s agent or representative to take any action against
an individual in retaliation for the exercise of rights under this Chapter.
This Section shall also apply to any individual working in or for the City who
mistakenly, but in good faith, alleges noncompliance with this Chapter.
Taking adverse
action against an individual within sixty (60) days of the individual=s assertion of rights shall raise a rebuttable presumption of having
done so in retaliation for the assertion of rights.
Additionally, it
shall be unlawful for any employer to intentionally circumvent the requirements
of this Chapter by contracting portions of its operation or leasing portions of
its property.
Section
4.65.050. Remedies.
(a) Criminal
Penalty. Any person who is convicted of violating this Chapter shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine of not
greater than five hundred dollars or by imprisonment in the county jail for not
more than six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment.
(b) Civil
Action. Any person, including the City, may enforce the provisions of this
Chapter by means of a civil action for injunctive and monetary relief. The
burden of proof in such cases shall be preponderance of the evidence. Any
person who violates or aids or incites another person to violate the provisions
of this Chapter is liable for each and every such offense for the actual
damages suffered by any aggrieved party or for statutory damages in the sum of
five hundred dollars, whichever is greater, and shall be liable for such
attorney's fees and costs as may be determined by the court in addition
thereto. The court may also award punitive damages to any plaintiff, including
the City, in a proper case as defined by Civil Code Section 3294. The burden of
proof for purposes of punitive damages shall be clear and convincing evidence.
(c) Administrative
Complaint. Any Employee claiming violation of this Chapter may file an
administrative complaint with the City Manager or his or her designee who shall
investigate the complaint and render a determination on it. If the City Manager
or Manager=s designee concludes that a violation has occurred,
he or she may issue orders to the employer appropriate to effectuate the
complaining Employees= rights, including, but not limited to, back pay and
reinstatement. If the employer refuses to comply with such orders, the City
Manager may revoke the employer=s business license. The City Manager=s determination shall be appealable to a hearing officer who shall
conduct an evidentiary hearing and issue a written decision thereon. The
hearing officer=s decision shall be reviewable in court.
(d) Nonexclusive
Remedies and Penalties. The remedies provided in this Section are not
exclusive, and nothing in this Chapter shall preclude any person from seeking
any other remedies, penalties or relief provided by law.
Section 4.65.060.
Supercession by Collective Bargaining Agreement.
All of the
provisions of this Chapter, or any part thereof, may be waived in a bona fide
collective bargaining agreement, but only if the waiver is explicitly set forth
in such agreement in clear and unambiguous terms. Unilateral implementation of
terms and conditions of employment by either party to a collective bargaining
relationship shall not constitute, or be permitted as, a waiver of all or any
part of the provisions of this Chapter.
Section 4.65.070.
Effective Date and Implementation.
Employers= obligations under Section 4.65.020 shall be effective as of July 1,
2002.
SECTION 2. Any provision of the Santa Monica
Municipal Code or appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this
Ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and no further, is hereby
repealed or modified to that extent necessary to effect the provisions of this
Ordinance.
SECTION 3. If any section, subsection,
sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be
invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have
passed this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause,
or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether
any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or
unconstitutional.
SECTION 4. The Mayor shall sign and the City
Clerk shall attest to the passage of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall cause
the same to be published once in the official newspaper within 15 days after
its adoption. Except as provided in Section 4.65.070, this Ordinance shall become
effective 30 days from its adoption.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________
MARSHA JONES MOUTRIE
City Attorney
|
|
Acrobat Reader must be loaded on your computer in order to view PDFs. Click on the Adobe icon to download the free Acrobat Reader. |
This page was last modified on
01/23/2008