ITEM 9-A
City Council Meeting: September 8, 1992
STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Staff
SUBJECT: Recommendation to Direct the City Attorney to Draft
an Ordinance Establishing Policies Regarding
Organized Group Activities in City Parks
INTRODUCTION
This report recommends that the City Council direct the City
Attorney to prepare an ordinance establishing policies regarding
organized group activities in City parks.
BACKGROUND
At its meeting of August 13, 1992, the Recreation and Parks
Commission approved a Commission Subcommittee report that
outlined general guidelines and more specific suggestions on how
to better regulate group activity in City parks. The Commission
found that extensive areas of City parks are being informally
reserved for private parties, organized programs and events.
These and recurrent group uses tend to monopolize areas within
the parks, restricting or discouraging access by the general
public. Overuse of particular sites for such activities tends to
destroy turf and ornamental planting.
Park use policies and ordinances from other cities were reviewed
to determine the nature and extent of public open space
regulation commonly imposed in Southern California communities.
The Commission subcommittee considered this research in
formulating its suggestions.
The full Commission accepted the subcommittee's recommendations
and further reinforced the subcommittee's intent that the
specific elements of an ordinance be consistent with the
following policy statement:
It is the policy of the City of Santa Monica to preserve the
City's parks and recreation areas in good condition for the
use and enjoyment of City residents and the general public,
and to control activities which monopolize areas within the
parks, discouraging or restricting access to others. In
general, use of any open space should be on a first-come,
first-served basis and the right of individuals to use the
parks for recreational and expressive purposes should be
protected.
Further, the Commission identified specific elements that could
be incorporated into a final ordinance, contingent upon review by
the City Attorney's Office. These proposed elements are attached
to this staff report.
DISCUSSION
An ordinance governing organized activities of groups of 25 or
more individuals in City parks is consistent with practices in
other Southern California cities. An appropriately developed
ordinance would: 1) provide reasonable procedures to govern
group uses that tend to restrict or discourage access by the
general public, 2) protect park open spaces from recurrent uses
they were not designed to withstand, preserving the City's
investment in park improvements, 3) exempt groups of 24 or less
from permit provisions, and 4) provide preference to City
residents, who may reserve space farther in advance than
non-residents.
The Cultural and Recreation Services Department currently
administers permitting procedures for use of athletic fields and
park buildngs. Recreation staff and Park Rangers from the Police
Department resolve on-site permit disputes, and would provide the
"enforcement" arm of the proposed permitting process. No
additional staff resources should be necessary to implement the
ordinance. A permit fee schedule would be developed for review
by the Recreation and Parks Commission and adoption by the City
Council. The fees envisioned by the Commission would cover
reasonable costs associated with permitting and favor City
residents.
As a part of the necessary legal review in preparation of an
ordinance, the following issues should be considered:
1) Inclusion of conditions sufficiently broad so as to eliminate
the need for administrative exemptions.
2) Clarification of what uses are absolutely prohibited and what
uses are accceptable only by permit.
3) Inclusion of a provision that would require posting of a
cleaning deposit or bond for groups beyond a certain size and
proof of insurance at a certain level for various categories of
activity.
4) The advisability of developing a broad ordinance encompassing
a range of public open space uses versus an ordinance with a
narrower focus, restricting recurrent uses only.
FISCAL/BUDGETARY IMPACT
There is no immediate budgetary impact from this proposed Council
action. However, when an ordinance and fee schedule are
approved, the necessary budgeting of projected revenues will be
requested.
RECOMMENDATION
The City staff recommends that the City Council direct the City
Attorney to prepare an ordinance establishing policies regarding
organized group activities in City parks, considering the
recommendations of the Recreation and Parks Commission; and to
direct staff to return with a resolution establishing a schedule
of fees for permits required by the ordinance.
Prepared by: Susan McCarthy, Acting Director of CARS
Suzanne Ota, Assistant Director of CARS
Attachment