City Council Meeting 5-08-01 Santa
Monica, California
TO: Mayor
and City Council
FROM: City Staff
SUBJECT: Ordinance
Amending the City=s Street Performance Regulations
Introduction
Construction of
the Transit Mall will result in new sidewalk space in the downtown area which
will likely be used by street performers.
Municipal Code amendments are necessary to extend current regulations to
this new space. Additionally, present
laws governing street performance and other activities on the Promenade and
Pier have proven inadequate in a few, specific respects. This staff report documents the current
circumstances which necessitate amendments and provides recommendations. A proposed ordinance is attached.
Background
The City Council
first adopted regulations governing the time, place and manner of street
performance in 1989. Since then, the
regulations have been amended many times in response to changing conditions in
the City=s most popular public spaces and in
light of regulatory experience. Each
time the laws were amended, the City=s goals were the same: to respect individual rights of
expression, preserve public safety in crowded places, maintain the appearance
of the Promenade and Pier, protect local merchants from unfair competition, and
ensure that the City=s most popular spaces remain vibrant
and appealing to residents and visitors.
The current
regulatory system was adopted in 1999.
It establishes noise limits, rotation and spacing requirements for
performers and free speech vendors, and restrictions on paraphernalia placed in
pedestrian areas. When the Council
adopted the present regulations, it also created a monitor position. The monitor has been working with performers,
police personnel, the Bayside District Corporation (BDC) and the Pier
Restoration Corporation (PRC) for the last two years, explaining the
regulations, informally resolving disputes and ensuring voluntary compliance
whenever possible.
Discussion
The Promenade
Information
supplied by performers, police personnel, the BDC and the monitor indicates
that the current regulatory system has apparently worked reasonably well on the
Promenade. Disputes have arisen, but they
are usually resolved swiftly and satisfactorily. Based upon this experience, the regulations appear adequate to
address the various concerns of performers, safety personnel and the business
community with one exception. The
Promenade remains extremely noisy and enforcement of noise requirements remains
problematic. A code change is
recommended to address this issue.
Other issues may be addressed through education, training and
enforcement.
Noise has been a
problem for many years on the Promenade.
The space is akin to a walled canyon.
Sound bounces off of the two and three story buildings which line the
pedestrian street. Crowds are very
large on weekends and evenings. Sound
sources are many, and often compete with one another for audience
attention.
Sound monitoring
equipment is difficult to use with accuracy and reliability in this
environment. Present restrictions
prohibit noise in excess of 85 decibels at 25 feet. However, at this distance it can be very difficult to distinguish
between noise sources and between any specific course and ambient levels. These problems are compounded by the
physical characteristics of the environment which include hard surfaces and
high walls which refract and distort sounds.
To address these conditions, City staff and the monitor recommend
revising the noise standard to include an equivalency for measurements taken at
one foot. The amended ordinance would
prohibit noise in excess of 85 decibels at 25 feet or 107 decibels at one
foot. The later standard was suggested
by a consultant to the BDC. It is an
equivalency to the existing standard, calculated mathematically. This revised, alternative standard will give noise monitors a better
opportunity to clearly identify the noise source and will thereby enhance
enforcement.
The Transit
Mall
The Transit Mall
project includes significantly widening sidewalks on Broadway and Santa Monica
Boulevard which are adjacent and perpendicular to the Promenade. When the sidewalks are widened, it is
anticipated that performers may begin working on them. In the future, based upon experience, the
Council may wish to discuss and formulate a regulatory policy governing
performance and free speech vending in this particular pedestrian space. Meanwhile, the proposed ordinance would
address this new situation by extending requirements for performance on the
Promenade to the new sidewalks on Santa Monica Boulevard which will be
completed this summer.
The Pier
The PRC, police
personnel and the monitor report that the present spacing and rotation system
has proven inadequate on the Pier.
Problems have arisen because the space is very narrow, is smaller than
the Promenade, and is basically a Adead-end@ street with ingress and egress only at the east end. Performers set up on both sides of the Pier
roadway. Stationary crowds accumulate
to watch these performers, blocking pedestrian access to the rest of the Pier. Those waiting for space to work station
themselves and their paraphernalia next to working performers. On weekends, holidays and in summer,
gridlock results. This present system
has clearly proven inadequate to maintain the free flow of pedestrian traffic
necessary for public safety.
Accordingly,
police personnel, the monitor and the PRC recommend that a new and different
system be adopted for that portion of the week and year when the Pier attracts
large crowds. Specifically, they
suggest that rotation be eliminated, that performance sites be designated and
that performance be limited to those sites with all permitted performers having
an equal opportunity for access through a daily lottery. The lottery would be implemented by
regulation which would allow the flexibility to experiment with different
alternatives and make revisions based upon staff experience, performers= input, and changing
conditions. The lottery system would
operate from April 1st through September 30th on
Wednesdays through Sundays. At other
times, the present system would remain in effect.
Financial
Impact
No financial
impact is anticipated if the attached ordinance is adopted.
Recommendation
It is
respectfully recommended that the accompanying ordinance be introduced for
first reading.
PREPARED BY: Marsha Jones Moutrie, City Attorney
Barry Rosenbaum,
Senior Land Use Attorney
ATTACHMENT: ORDINANCE