PCD:SF:AS:JL:F:\PLAN\SHARE\COUNCIL\STRPT\2004\Substantial
Remodel2
August 3,
2004 Santa
Monica, California
TO: Mayor
and City Council
FROM: City
Staff
SUBJECT: Introduction and First Reading of an
Interim Ordinance to Modify the Zoning Code Pertaining to the Substantial
Remodel Definition and the Applicability Requirements for Adjustment
Applications
INTRODUCTION
On July 27, 2004 the City Council conducted a public hearing and provided direction to staff on the proposed interim ordinance defining substantial remodel and providing an adjustment process for commercial structures.
BACKGROUND
Substantial remodel is a term used to identify the point
at which an existing structure has been altered to such an extent that it
warrants compliance with all current applicable municipal regulations. It
applies only to buildings that do not comply with current development
standards, including but not limited to: setbacks, height, parking, and land
use entitlements. The provision is intended to balance opportunities that would
allow the retention and modest expansion of an existing nonconforming structure
with the City’s desire to abate nonconforming structures in order to promote
public health, safety and general welfare.
Council requested staff to return with an ordinance
that would allow the replacement of footings and provide an adjustment in the event
during construction it is determined walls need replacement due to dry rot or
other unforeseen conditions.
The proposed ordinance now allows replacement of the
structural components below the finished first floor provided the wall elements
remain in place at all times and continue to provide necessary structural
support upon completion of the project.
The ordinance now separates the requirements for commercial and
industrial buildings from residential buildings. In addition, minor changes have been made to the ordinance
language for clarity. All changes are
underlined in the proposed ordinance.
The proposed ordinance does not provide an adjustment
process because the SMMC Section 9.04.20.34.030 (g) already provides an
adjustment process allowing buildings to retain non-conforming setbacks if at
least 35% of the exterior walls remain.
Staff believes this provides sufficient flexibility to address
unforeseen conditions.
CONCLUSION
Application of the existing substantial remodel
definition has resulted in structures that comply with the literal reading of
the provision, but not necessarily the intent. Wholly new structures are
constructed under the pretense of being a remodel, which has allowed the
retention of nonconforming structures to the detriment of the public health,
safety and general welfare. The proposed interim ordinance seeks to reinforce
the intent of the regulation, improve its applicability to commercial
structures and balance the City’s desire to ensure safe buildings and the
retention of historically significant structures.
CEQA STATUS
The project is exempt from the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section
15061(b)(3). Specifically, where it can be seen with certainty that an action
on a project will not result in a significant effect of the environment, that
project shall be exempt from environmental review. The proposed ordinance
modifies existing regulations to reinforce the intent of the original language
and provides exemption provisions to encourage safer buildings and the
retention of structures listed on the City’s Historic Resources Inventory.
BUDGET / FINANCIAL IMPACT
The recommendations in this report have no budget or
financial impact.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council introduce for first
reading the attached Interim Ordinance amending the substantial remodel
definition and the applicability requirements for Adjustment applications.
Prepared by: Suzanne
Frick, Director of Planning and Community Development
Amanda
Schachter, Planning Manager
Jonathan
Lait, AICP, Acting Principal Planner
Attachments: A: Proposed Interim Ordinance