City Council Meeting: December 14, 2004                                                  Santa Monica, CA

 

 

 

TO:                  City Council

 

FROM:            City Staff

 

SUBJECT:     Initial Steps in Defining Community Strategies to Reduce Gang Violence and Related Crime in the Pico Neighborhood

 

 

 

Introduction

This report proposes initial steps in defining a focused community effort to reduce gang violence in Santa Monica, and related crime in the Pico neighborhood.

 

Background

While violent crime in Santa Monica has trended downward for more than a decade, and overall categories of violent crime have fallen 62% in the Pico neighborhood,  incidents of shots fired and violent assaults continue to occur in that area.  The involvement of young people in those incidents and the loss of young lives in or just outside the neighborhood* have stimulated enforcement, vigils and the development of school and neighborhood-focused social service programs.  Despite efforts to-date, the problems associated with gang violence persist.

 

The Pico neighborhood is the City’s most diverse in regard to race, ethnicity and income.  It has the highest concentration of 15 to 24 year olds in Santa Monica and is a mix of long term residents and more recent arrivals, owner occupants and renters. 

Market forces that have driven the cost of housing up citywide also affect the Pico neighborhood.  Efforts to create and preserve affordable housing in the neighborhood have met with mixed acceptance.  Those who need assistance to remain in the community appreciate the affordable housing complexes while others see them as over-concentrated and a locus for criminal violence.

 

The population of young people in the neighborhood includes a relatively small number with gang affiliation.  Their activities generate intra-community violence and attract violent incidents involving gang members from other areas of Los Angeles.  The Santa Monica Police attribute the majority of drug and gun crime that occurs in the neighborhood to gang members.

 

In late September, shots were fired from a vehicle at young men adjacent to Edison Elementary School.  The intended victim or victims escaped serious injury, no school children were injured and residents of apartments in the line of fire were also spared.  Two individuals suspected of the crime have been arrested and held for probation and parole violations.  The police have insufficient evidence to obtain a filing for the crime of assault with a deadly weapon and investigation of the incident is ongoing.  School parents and neighbors have called on the School Board and City Council to take measures to avoid recurrence of violence in the area.  Police presence in the neighborhood and around the school has been increased while City and District staff evaluates other measures.

 

Discussion

Discussions with community members, school district and college representatives, business and religious leaders and City staff from police, recreation and human services, suggest that a focused, closely coordinated and sustained community-wide effort may reduce gang violence in Santa Monica.  A limited review of rigorously evaluated programs in other communities confirms that this approach holds promise. 

 

The reasons for continued youth violence in the Pico neighborhood are complex and inter-related.  Community discussions have focused on issues ranging from police practices, school achievement, parenting, poverty, the presence of low-income housing, access to social services, convenience of alternative activities for youth and availability of information about existing programs and services.  The considerable resources brought to bear over the years have not ended the violence and the chance that changing any single aspect of the problem will do so appears remote.  Still, parents, neighbors, police, probation and parole officials, teachers and counselors, business owners, clergy, housing managers, social workers and recreation providers must all “own” the problem and work closely together to achieve resolution.

 

Institutional Partners

The City of Santa Monica - including the Police and Community and Cultural Service Departments, the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District and Santa Monica College all have facilities and programs in the Pico neighborhood.  The three institutions are responsible for the effective use of public resources.  A coordinated effort to link programs and create pathways for neighborhood youth to higher education and better paying jobs requires the commitment of elected officials, administrators and staff of the three institutions.  The City/ School District/ College Liaison Committee will have a preliminary discussion of such an effort at the next meeting.

 

Los Angeles County, the State of California and, perhaps, the federal government (in regard to gun violations) are other institutional players whose prosecutors, parole officers and probation officers would be participants in a coordinated intervention.

 

Business Partners

While encouraging neighborhood youth to remain and succeed in school is essential, the transition to and opportunity for paid work is also a critical element in providing youth with skills that lead to productive and rewarding lives.  Because small business is the principal source of job growth in the state, the Santa Monica Chamber of Commerce and its members can play an important role by introducing youth to the discipline of employment, providing practical job experience and contributing to family economic stability.  The burgeoning representation of entertainment industry firms in the City should present particularly appealing opportunity for placements if connections to that sector can be achieved.  There is currently no comprehensive service deliverer to develop jobs and prepare and support youth for employment.

 

Social Service/Non-Profit Partners

The City, County and School District fund an array of services that are available to neighborhood residents and delivered by non-profit agencies.  Careful assessment of the appropriateness and success of those efforts, clarification of outcome expectations and accountability, redirection of funding as required and development of closer programmatic links between providers may enhance the effectiveness of currently available resources.  Adoption of a coordinated case management model involving providers, school personnel, and police and recreation staff who work on prevention and intervention may be essential to realize the full potential of services for those families and individuals most at risk. 

 

Neighborhood Group and Religious Partners

Long term residents recall and regret the passing of a time when intervention with families in trouble and youth at risk came swiftly and surely from neighbors and the church.  The loss of community is a troubling contemporary phenomenon and reliance on public institutions to intervene is an inadequate substitute.  The Pico Neighborhood Association, Virginia Avenue Park Advisory Board, Community Violence Prevention Coalition, Mothers for Justice and Edison School PTA are among groups active in the neighborhood that can help to identify and link families and youth with services.  Local religious leaders have begun to meet together regularly.  They too can be an important information and referral resource and can help recruit mentors and volunteers to work with youth.

 

Learning From Other Communities

The results of model interventions in other communities hold lessons for Santa Monica.  Swift, negative consequences for engaging in violence and the ready availability of intervention and prevention programs to avert such activity are key elements of several such interventions.  The former involves proactive and concentrated enforcement and prosecution while the latter includes providing sustained and targeted social service support to families and youth and convenient, constructive activities for young people that recognize the unique interests and needs of this age group.

 

Challenges to success in other communities have included designation of an effective coordinating agency, dedication and retention of staff to preserve continuity of programs, conveniently co-located services, effective communication across and among participating agencies, avoiding narrow role definition and role conflict, availability of financial and program resources, and sustaining grass roots participation and community commitment.  Strategies must be developed to meet and overcome such challenges.

 

Community acceptance of the role that police play in addressing gang violence can be problematic.  Some community members may welcome a significant police presence and aggressive enforcement, particularly in the wake of a violent incident.  Others may respond positively when regularly assigned officers take an active and visible role in community events and meetings and are perceived as a constant, problem-solving presence in the community.  Santa Monica’s Police Department employs a strong, strategic enforcement response to gang violence, has designated youth service officers who work with the schools and make use of prevention and intervention resources, and, in addition to other community policing strategies, has initiated over the last two years a community-oriented, problem solving approach through its Neighborhood Centered Policing model, placing responsibility for neighborhood responsiveness at the highest command levels.  The Police Chief and staff of the department are committed to reducing gang violence and welcome an exchange of views about their efforts.

 

Tapping Community Ideas and Energy

To focus resources effectively and constructively on the elimination of gang affiliation and violence, the potential partners identified here must come together with residents of the Pico neighborhood.  As a first step, in a four to six hour, facilitated, bilingual community working session critical elements for success can be identified.  A context-setting presentation, perhaps from representatives of successful endeavors in other communities, would precede the working session.  Gathered in small groups, attendees would address key questions, share information and experience and build trust and respect.  Through reporting and summarizing the day’s work, the community will have an opportunity to coalesce around a problem, set specific long and short term goals, define next steps and commit to moving forward together and being accountable to each other.  To ensure broad participation, the session would be in a location convenient to the neighborhood and preceded by extensive outreach.

 

While it is premature to anticipate that next steps will include a concerted community-wide intervention, other efforts to improve the quality of life in the Pico neighborhood are underway or scheduled.  The heightened police presence will be maintained in the neighborhood and around Edison School.  Police personnel responsible for neighborhood-centered policing will be interacting with and responding to residents.  The Liaison Committee will address the issue in January/February.  City Human Services staff will suggest that the early childhood home visit program for which the Lifelong Learning partnership unsuccessfully sought Proposition 10 funding be revisited to determine if resources could be obtained for a more closely targeted effort.  City staff is cooperating with the District in a thorough evaluation of support programs offered on school campuses with City funding.  City staff will consult with St. Anne’s to determine how best to assist a new job development effort that the church has brought to the community.  Funding has been secured for Cloverfield and 20th streetscape improvements (identified as a desirable project by the neighborhood several years ago) and community review of design will occur within the next few months.  Estimates for improving street and alley illumination in sections of the neighborhood are being prepared and consultation with neighbors will occur before recommendations are finalized.  Planning for a re-opening celebration and for ongoing programming and activities at Virginia Avenue Park are underway.

 

Budget/Financial Impact

Improvement of the quality of life in the Pico neighborhood is a budget objective for the current fiscal year.  The City currently funds programs and services in the Pico neighborhood.  Development of the Fiscal year 2005/06 budget will commence early in 2005.   

 

The recommended actions have no immediate budget/financial impact beyond the costs of a facilitated community workshop, estimated at $10,000.  Sufficient funds are available at account 01274.544390 for that purpose.

 

Recommendation

Staff recommends that the City organize a community working session with Pico neighborhood residents and partner organizations, to be held in January or early February of 2005 as an initial step in defining strategies and establishing relationships that will lead to reduction of gang violence in the community.   

 

 

 

Prepared by: Susan McCarthy, City Manager



* The number of deaths has been variously reported in news articles and interviews.  Numbers differ depending upon the time periods and/or geographic boundaries selected for reporting and whether homicides alone are counted.  The constant is that each young life cut short represents a loss for a family and an argument for community intervention.