TO: Mayor
and City Council
FROM: City Staff
SUBJECT: Petition
for Various Street Improvements on
This report
recommends that the City Council accept a petition submitted by residents of
In September 2003, residents
of
The
proposed improvements will not result in loss of travel or parking lanes.
On July 30, 2004, a
petition was circulated by
Staff recommends that
City Council set a public hearing on the proposed assessment district for March
8, 2005. A public meeting is tentatively
scheduled for Tuesday, February 1, 2005, at 7:00 pm, at the Ken Edwards Center
to discuss improvement plans and action items.
Notices of the City’s
intent to form an assessment district, and hold a public hearing and public meeting
will be mailed to owners/occupants forty-five (45) days in advance of the public
hearing in accordance with Article 13D of the California Constitution and
Improvement Act of 1911. In addition to the
notice, property owners will be sent a ballot with which to vote for or against
the assessment. A list of properties and
the assessment map will be available to the City Council at the time of the
public hearing.
Property owners may
return ballots by mail or hand deliver them to the City Clerk prior to the
close of the public hearing. At the
public hearing, City Council will hear all objections and protests, if any, to
the proposed assessment. At the
conclusion of the public hearing, the assessment ballots submitted and not withdrawn,
in support of or in opposition to the proposed assessment will be
tabulated. No assessment will be imposed
if there is a majority protest. A
majority protest exists if, upon the conclusion of the public hearing, ballots
submitted in opposition to the assessment exceed the ballots submitted in favor
of the assessment. Tabulation of the
assessment ballots will be weighted according to the proportional financial
obligation of the affected property.
The
project cost is approximately $1,195,000 which includes labor and incidental
costs such as staff time for engineering surveys, public notifications,
advertisements, construction management, inspections, and design and
construction costs. The City will
contribute $320,000, the amount originally budgeted for street improvements in
the area; and the property owners in the improved district will pay the
balance, approximately $875,000. For a
property with a frontage of fifty feet, the assessment would be $9,750. Since this type of assessment is not
identified in the City’s Rent Control Charter as allowable pass-through costs
to tenants, property owners of controlled units will not be able to pass-through
any of the assessment costs to renters.
There
is no budget impact to accepting the petition and setting a public hearing for
the proposed assessment district. If the
assessment passes the budget impact and estimated breakdown of costs are as
follows:
|
|
Estimated Property Owner Assessments |
|
$875,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated City Contributions |
|
$320,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Project Estimate |
|
$1,195,000 |
|
If the assessment passes, $320,000
is available in account M010152.589000 for the City’s contribution. Account 80.201238 will be established for the
property owners share, if the assessment passes.
Staff recommends that
the City Council:
1.
Accept the petition for improvement on
2. Set a public hearing for March 8, 2005 on the proposed
assessment district.
Prepared by: Craig
Perkins, Director, Environmental and Public Works
Management
Anthony
Antich, P.E., City Engineer
Dave
Britton, P.E., Principal Civil Engineer
Phil
Tong, Administrative Analyst