Council Date: 1-25-05                                                                           Santa Monica, California

 

 

 

 

TO:                  Mayor and City Council

FROM:            City Staff

 

SUBJECT:     Review Mid- Fiscal Year 2004/05 Budget Status; Approve Associated Budget Changes; Adopt Resolution Establishing Various Classification and Salary Rates; Consider Status of Community Priorities and Results of Resident Survey and Provide Preliminary Direction on Preparation of Budgets for the Next Two Fiscal Years

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

In preparation for development of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2005/06 budget and financial plan for FY2006/07, this report provides the mid-year status of the current budget, recommends associated changes including classification and compensation changes, provides an update on work efforts related to the key Community Priorities for the current year and reports the results of a survey of residents.   The report proposes refinement of the budget preparation and adoption schedule and requests preliminary direction from Council to inform the development of the budget and work plan, including community priorities.

 

MID-TERM BUDGET REVIEW

 

Financial Review – General Fund

For the past several years, City Council has adopted General Fund operating and capital budgets that sought to bring projected expenditure and revenue growth in line with each other.   Difficult choices and constrained project and program aspirations characterized the period.   An annual emphasis on achieving expenditure savings and operating efficiencies and stronger than anticipated economic recovery this past year contributed to completing each year with positive General Fund positions.  

 

Staff recommends that Council adopt mid-year expenditure changes.  These include loan interest for the purchase of 1601 14th Street ($160,000), hazard mitigation costs associated with capital construction ($1,393,869), Anticipated construction close out costs and other expenses, such as signage and furniture, for Virginia Avenue Park ($392,300), construction of streetscape and safety improvements for 20th and Cloverfield Boulevard in the Pico Neighborhood ($540,000), payroll software improvements and fax/copier replacement ($200,000) and matching funds for a grant for a new Fire radio system ($224,100).  Appropriations, totaling $299,066, of prior year unspent funds, funds that have been set-aside for implementation fo the Matrix study recommendation, and other adjustments bring the total General Fund appropriation to $3,209,335 million. 

 

A summary of changes to the FY2004/05 Adopted Budget are detailed in the chart below (page 3).  Descriptions of the proposed changes to revenues, expenditures and balance sheet transactions are shown on Exhibit A2.  Exhibit A3 identifies budget changes requiring Council actions that transfer monies between departments but have no net impact on the adopted budget.

 

FY2004-05
MID-TERM BUDGET
GENERAL FUND CHANGES
(in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revised Budget as of 12/31/03

 

 

 

 

 

Proposed Budget Changes

 

 

Revised Budget

 

Beginning Fund Balance

16.7

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

16.7

 

Revenues

170.8

 

 

 

 

 

4.5

 

 

175.3

 

Expenditures

(174.7)

 

 

 

 

 

(6.5)

 

 

(181.2)

 

Balance Sheet Transfers

4.3

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

4.3

 

Application of FY02/03 Savings to Offset Shortfall*

0.0

 

 

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

2.0

 

Ending Fund Balance

17.1

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

17.1

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Audited FY2002/03 saving of $5.7 million can be used to offfset budget changes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revised Budget as of 12/31/03

 

 

 

 

 

Proposed Budget Changes

 

 

Revised Budget

 

Beginning Fund Balance

16.7

 

 

 

 

 

5.7

*

 

22.4

 

Revenues

170.8

 

 

 

 

 

4.5

 

 

175.3

 

Expenditures

(174.7)

 

 

 

 

 

(6.5)

 

 

(181.2)

 

Balance Sheet Transfers

4.3

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

4.3

 

Ending Fund Balance

17.1

 

 

 

 

 

3.7

 

 

20.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FY02/03 savings of $5.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adopted Budget
as of
7/1/04

Year-To-  Date

Changes
7/1/04 - 12/31/04

Total
Budget
as of
12/31/04

Proposed
Midterm Budget Changes

Revised Budget

Beginning Fund Balance

32.5

1

0.0

 

32.5

 

0.0

 

 

32.5

 

Revenues

192.4

 

0.0

 

192.4

 

2.0

 

 

194.4

 

Other Financing

0.0

 

27.1

2

27.1

 

(0.0)

 

 

27.1

 

Expenditures

(186.1)

 

(46.3)

3

(232.4)

 

(3.2)

 

 

(235.6)

 

Balance Sheet Transfers

(7.7)

 

8.8

4 

1.1

 

5.1

 

 

6.2

 

Ending Fund Balance

31.1

 

(10.4)

 

20.7

 

3.9

 

 

24.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 Adjusts beginning balance for audited FY2003/04 balance.

 

2 Civic Center Parking Structure Lease/Rental Bonds.

 

3 Appropriates funds for Civic Center Parking Structure ($27.1M), 1601 14th Street Acquisition ($17.1M:

  $18.5 cost less appropriation from Public Safety Facility used for purchase -$1.4), General Plan update

  ($1.6M) and Convention & Visitors Bureau Tourism Promotion (0.5M).

 

4 Includes transfers for 1601 14th Street Acquisition loan from Water and Wastewater funds ($10.0M),

  use of funds set-aside on the Balance Sheet for General Plan update ($1.6M) and Tourism Promotion

  ($0.5M) less set-aside for one time employee benefit increases ($3.3M).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial Review – Enterprise Funds

During the economic downturn, rates for service charged by Enterprise funds including Water, Wastewater, Stormwater and Solid Waste increased annually by the CPI.  Like the General Fund, Enterprise funds have experienced cost increases stemming from medical premium, workers compensation, pension contribution and energy cost escalation well in excess of CPI.   Consequently, the fund balances of the Enterprise funds (Water, Wastewater, Stormwater and Solid Waste) are declining and should be addressed in the coming two-year budget plan.  Current projections indicate that the funds will fall into a negative fund balance in the following years:

            Solid Waste:              FY2005/06

Water:                         FY2006/07

            Wastewater:                          FY2007/08

            Stormwater:                           FY2009/10

           

 

During budget preparation staff will review with Council the fund assumptions and proposed actions to bring the funds into healthier condition.

 

 

Personnel Actions

Included at Exhibit B1 is a resolution establishing new position classifications and adopting salary rates for various classifications.   The salary changes result from analysis of similar positions in comparable cities and internal equity factors and implement the study required by the 2001-2004 collective bargaining agreement with MEA.  The resolution establishes the minimum salary for as-needed classifications at $11.50 in response to Council direction regarding establishment of a living wage for City employees. 

 

At Exhibit B2 is a listing of changes to budgeted positions and classifications that have been reviewed and approved by the Director of Human Resources and the City Manager and require approval by Council in order to be incorporated into the FY2004/05 budget.  No appropriation is required at this time to implement the changes.

Community Priorities

At Exhibit C is a status report on work efforts associated with the Community Priorities adopted by Council with the 2004/05 budget.   Each is a multi-year objective requiring staff and financial resources as well as cooperative efforts by multiple departments to accomplish.   Staff recommends that, with Council concurrence, these objectives remain a principal focus for staff and financial resources in 2005/06 and into 2006/07.    A two year work plan will be proposed in conjunction with the budget.

 

It is estimated that 1000 or more homeless individuals are in Santa Monica on any given day.   The circumstances endured by the homeless and their impact on City residents, visitors and businesses are a principal source of concern and frustration for the community.    A network of social service agencies, model program design and substantial City funding have changed the circumstances of individual homeless persons for the better, but the magnitude of the problem persists.   Many other communities do not share the burden.

 

Council may wish to consider the addition of a community priority to address the impacts of homelessness in the community.  A potential work plan could include steps such as the following, that would be refined in the proposed budget should Council add this priority.

 

  • Re-structure the elements of Santa Monica's continuum of care to address the chronic homeless in the community and advocate for changes in federal, state and regional regulations, agencies and systems to more equitably share the challenge of ending homelessness.

 

  • Extend the Chronic Homeless Pilot Program described in the January 11 staff report to serve additional service resistant individuals who have been in the community for five or more years; target existing resources, services and housing priorities to this population to achieve success.

 

  • Proceed with an implementation strategy to reduce chronic public inebriation in Santa Monica:  consult with the County, Public Counsel, the courts and other community-based models to determine their feasibility for Santa Monica.  (Per Council direction, staff is currently assessing the feasibility and effectiveness of a sobering center and will return to Council with an update in March 2005).

 

  • Reassess local ordinances and regulations and consider whether revisions would assist in addressing homelessness and its impacts.

 

  • Assess models in other communities for enforcing quality of life violations and institute best practices.

 

  • Advocate through Bring LA Home, the Westside Cities and with federal representatives for a year-round shelter or shelters on the Veterans Administration property in West Los Angeles and other Westside locations as necessary to accommodate the regional burden.

 

  • Advocate for creation of incentives and sanctions for communities to encourage shouldering a fair share of the burden of ending homelessness.  

 

  • Advocate for change in state law governing mandatory psychiatric assessment and treatment for the gravely disabled homeless.

 

 

PREPARATION OF 2005/06 AND 2006/07 BUDGETS

 

Resident Survey

In addition to public input provided in person, by fax or letter and/or over the internet throughout the year, the results of a random telephone survey of residents have been useful in shaping responsive budgets and work plans.   For 2005 the survey of 400+ randomly selected households was conducted commencing January 17.   A report of key findings will be presented to Council at the January 25, 2005 Council meeting and results will be posted on the City website. 

 

Refinement of Budget Preparation

By Charter provision, the Council adopts a budget annually.   During the recent economic downturn, staff prepared for Council’s consideration both the one-year budget for adoption and, in addition, a tentative financial and work plan for a second year.   The practice has been helpful to staff, Council and the community in anticipating multi-year work plans and the associated financial consequences.

 

With greater economic stability projected over the next several years, a logical refinement of this practice would be to move to biennial budget preparation and consideration.   As captured in Exhibit D, the significant work effort associated with budget development would occur every two years.    Council would continue to adopt the budget one year at a time as required by Charter, informed by annual public input.   In adopting the budget for FY2005/06, for example, the Council would also signal satisfaction with the financial and work plan for FY2006/07.    Following a mid-term status report at the end of the first year, the FY2006/07 budget would be presented for adoption, incorporating any changes required to ensure that it remains responsive to community priorities.

 

The principal advantage of this refinement would be to concentrate the “heavy lifting” of budget development in a single year and dedicate the time saved by preparing a second year update to conducting other studies and analyses that benefit services and operations.   The Charter requirements for annual adoption of a budget by vote of four or more Council members would be observed.   Public input and Council direction would occur annually as they do now.    The longer range financial focus afforded recently by the two-year budget time horizon would be maintained by enhanced availability of the five year forecast, now primarily used as a staff planning tool.

 

Preliminary Direction

Preliminary direction from Council is requested for development of the FY 2005/06 and 2006/07 budget and work plan, including community priorities.

 

Budget/Financial Impact

The impact of adoption of the mid-year changes detailed in Exhibits A2, A3, B1 and B2 are incorporated in the chart on page 3 of this report.

 

RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends that:

 

1)     City Council approve the budget changes detailed in Exhibits A2 and A3 and position and classification changes detailed in Exhibit B2;

2)     City Council adopt a Resolution establishing various classifications and salary rates for various positions in Exhibit B1;

3)     Council provide direction to staff for development of the FY 2005/06 and 2006/07 budgets and work plans, including community priorities. 

 

 

EXHIBITS

A1:   Summary of FY2004-05 Revenue and Expenditure Budget Changes

A2:   Proposed FY2004-05 Mid-Term Revenue, Expenditure and Balance Sheet Changes

A3:   Proposed FY2004-05 Mid-Term Budget Changes with No Net Budget Impact

B1:   Resolution Establishing New Classifications and Adopting Salary Rates for Certain Positions

B2:   Position and Classification Changes           

C:     Community Priorities Update

D:     Rolling Biennial Budget Process

 

 

 

Prepared by:  Steve Stark, Director of Finance

                        Janet Shelton, Budget Manager

                        Kathy Chang, Principal Budget Analyst

                        David Carr, Principal Budget Analyst

                        Annette Morales, Senior Budget Analyst

                        Prema Krishnan, Senior Budget Analyst

                        Terese Toomey, Senior Budget Analyst

                        Mona Miyasato, Assistant to the City Manager – Management Services

                        Kate Vernez, Assistant to the City Manager – Governmental Affairs

                        Judy Rambeau, Assistant to the City Manager – Community Relations

                        Karen Bancroft, Director of Human Resources

                        Barbara Stinchfield, Director of Community & Cultural Services

                        Julie Rusk – Human Services Manager