City Council Meeting: November
14, 2006
Agenda Item: 7-A
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Craig Perkins, Director -
Environmental and
Subject: Introduce Non-Recyclable Plastic Disposable Food Service Container Ordinance and Appropriate Funds upon Program Implementation
Recommended
Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1)
introduce for first
reading an ordinance banning non-recyclable plastic disposable food services
containers, and;
2)
authorize the budget
changes as outlined in the Budget/Financial Impact section upon program
implementation.
Executive
Summary
On June 13, 2006,
City Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance banning all non-recyclable
plastic disposable food service containers in
Discussion
On June 13, 2006, City
Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance banning the use of
non-recyclable plastic disposable food service containers in
The ordinance
prohibits food providers from dispensing prepared food in disposable food
service containers made from non-recyclable plastic, including expanded
polystyrene and clear polystyrene, recycling symbol #6. Other plastic containers made from recyclable
materials, including those marked with the recycling symbols #1 through #5, are
allowed by the ordinance. (Note: the
City’s Solid Waste Division currently collects and recycles plastic containers
with the recycling symbols #1 to #5). Food
service containers are defined as single use disposable products used in the
restaurant and food service industry for serving or transporting prepared,
ready-to-consume food or beverages. This
includes, but is not limited to, plates, bowls, cups, trays and hinged or
lidded containers. This does not include
single use disposable items such as straws, cup lids or utensils, nor does it
include single use disposable packaging for unprepared foods. A food provider is defined in the ordinance
as any establishment that provides prepared food for public consumption in
The ordinance allows
for a one year renewable hardship exemption if it can be demonstrated that compliance
with the ordinance would cause undue economic hardship to a food provider. An undue hardship would include any situation
where no reasonably feasible available alternatives exist to a specific and
necessary non-recyclable plastic food service container. The decision to provide an exemption will be
made by the Director of the Environmental and
The Director of EPWM
will have primary responsibility for enforcement of the ordinance. It is anticipated that enforcement will be
primarily conducted on a complaint basis and will be carried out by existing
EPWM inspectors on an as-needed basis.
Inspectors will have the power to issue notices of violations to food
providers who fail to comply with any of the requirements of the
ordinance. For the first violation, a
written warning notice will be issued.
The penalty for subsequent violations will be a fine in increasing
amounts from $100 to $500, depending on the number of times the food provider
has previously violated the ordinance.
The requirements of
the ordinance will come into effect one year after Council adoption for all
food providers. Council directed staff
to implement the proposed ban for City facilities, City managed concessions,
City sponsored events and City permitted events beginning June 13, 2006. Environmental Programs Division staff will
conduct workshops and other outreach activities during the interim to provide
information and assistance to food providers in identifying alternatives to
non-recyclable plastic disposable food service containers and locating
suppliers of alternative products. The
outreach program will strongly encourage the use of the most sustainable
packaging types from a resource use and marine debris perspective, and will
focus on non-plastic, bio-based and biodegradable containers. The Santa Monica Chamber of Commerce has
agreed to assist the City staff in providing outreach to its members.
Plastic Carryout
Bags
City Council directed staff at its June 13, 2006, meeting to return with information and recommendations regarding options for regulating the use of plastic carryout bags in Santa Monica . On September 30, 2006, Governor Schwartzenegger signed into law AB 2449 which regulates plastic carryout bags statewide. The new law requires the operator of a store, as defined, to establish an in-store recycling program that provides an opportunity for a customer of the store to return clean plastic carryout bags to that store. The law requires a plastic carryout bag provided by a store to have specified information printed or displayed on the bag, and requires the placement of a plastic carryout bag collection bin in each store greater than 10,000 square feet that is visible and easily accessible to the consumer. These stores must send these collected bags for recycling. The law also requires the operator of a store to make reusable bags, as defined, available to customers for purchase. The law requires a manufacturer of plastic carryout bags to develop educational materials to encourage the reducing, reusing, and recycling of the bags and to make the materials available to stores, as specified. The law specifically prohibits a city, county, or other public agency from adopting, implementing, or enforcing an ordinance, resolution, regulation, or rule that requires a store to collect, transport, or recycle plastic carryout bags or conduct additional auditing or reporting, or imposing a plastic carryout bag fee upon a store, except as specified. The law will take effect on July 1, 2007, and will remain in effect through January 1, 2013. Due to the prohibition by this law on City regulation of plastic carryout bags, staff recommends that City Council take no action at this time to address plastic carryout bags.
Alternatives
In addition to the recommended action, the City Council could 1) modify the ordinance to better achieve the Council’s intent; or 2) not adopt the ordinance.
The impact of the first alternative would depend on the modifications
that Council made and could either expand or reduce the scope of the ordinance
provisions, penalties and who the ordinance applies to. Pursuing the second alternative would avoid
additional costs to the City for outreach and implementation, and would avoid
potential additional costs to some
Budget/Financial Impact
The primary budgetary impacts from adoption
of the recommended ordinance include additional costs to City operations to buy
alternative food packaging. Staff
anticipates that additional staff and funding will be needed to conduct
workshops and outreach activities during the interim period.
The following budget changes are needed for
program implementation:
1)
Authorize
the increase of 0.25 FTE (2-year) limited-term temporary Administrative Analyst
position.
2)
Appropriate
$15,715 to account number 31662.511500 (temporary employees) and $31,000 to
account number 31662.522310 (office supplies).
Since enforcement will be carried out by
existing City inspectors on an as-needed basis, it is anticipated that
enforcement can be completed without any additional budgetary impacts.
Prepared by: Dean Kubani, Environmental Programs Manager
|
Approved: |
|
Forwarded to Council: |
|
|
|
|
|
Craig Perkins Director
– Environmental and |
|
P. City Manager |
Attachment: Ordinance