City Council Meeting: February
27, 2007
Agenda Item: 8-A
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Barbara Stinchfield, Director,
Community and Cultural Services
Subject: Presentation of the Long-range
Community Cultural Plan and Recommendation to Review and Accept the Plan
Recommended
Action
Staff recommends that Council:
1) review and accept Creative
Capital: Culture, Community Vision, the recently completed long-range
community cultural plan;
2) provide conceptual approval of the strategies outlined in
the executive summary of the plan; and
3) direct staff to initiate implementation as outlined in
Section V. of the plan, contingent upon available resources and partnerships.
Executive
Summary
Creative Capital, the result of
a yearlong process of research and dialogue, presents residents’ collective vision
for the future of the arts and culture in
Based on this new understanding, Creative Capital offers a plan for
the City’s continued cultural development over the next ten years. The three core strategies and associated
recommendations provide a roadmap for
Discussion
Background
Much like other long-range plans, the development of a cultural
plan engages a wide cross section of the community in taking stock of available
cultural assets, needs, opportunities, and resources, and establishing a
collective vision for the future.
Creative Capital: Culture, Community.
Vision
Demographics
of the Creative Sector
Culture sustains
In The
source for the workforce comparison is a study by Steve Nivin, PhD,
commissioned for Creative Capital.
The twenty most creative


Forty-three
percent of
Vision
Strategies
and recommendations
Despite this
creative abundance and relatively widespread understanding of its value,
A. Celebrating Innovation
Cross-Sector Innovation
1.
Recognize and support the importance of
individual artists to
2.
Adopt the theme of innovation and creative
individuals as the basis for programming and marketing of
3. Capitalize on the extraordinary concentration of creative people and resources by fostering communication and leveraging partnerships for innovative cultural programming.
B.
Increasing Cultural Participation
Marketing and Coordination
4.
Develop a comprehensive directory of
5.
Develop a communitywide marketing program to
build audiences for
6.
Explore the evolving creative potential of
electronic communication to support
7.
Develop cooperative strategies with
Festivals
8.
Continue and further develop existing arts and
cultural festivals, such as the
9.
Develop major new arts and cultural festivals,
to celebrate and explore
10. Facilitate the provision of small-scale festivals or showcases that highlight the arts and culture, or contain a cultural component, through a co-sponsorship arrangement.
Integrating Cultural Programming
11. Seek further opportunities to integrate arts and cultural programming for all ages into non-traditional venues and programs such as community centers, parks, and other open and/or public spaces.
12.
Expand the cultural programming partnership
between the Cultural Affairs Division and other City divisions and departments,
including the
13. Enhance accessibility for senior citizens to arts and cultural programs through integration of programs into existing venues and services for seniors, and by promoting partnerships through the network of lifelong learning service providers.
14. Find opportunities to promote the reintroduction of arts education in all public schools through implementation of the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District’s Arts for All plan, in cooperation with the district and the Santa Monica-Malibu Educational Foundation.
Public Art
15. Implement a public art in private development program that supports a Cultural Trust Fund flexible enough to help fulfill the community’s arts and cultural vision, as identified in this planning process.
16. In future years conduct an assessment of both the public and private public art programs to gauge their effectiveness in meeting the community’s cultural needs.
C. Enhancing Sustainability
Cultural Facilities
17.
Establish Santa Monica Arts Alleys as zones
for the concentration and development of small-scale arts uses, such as
creative businesses, artists’ studios, small performing and exhibition spaces,
and other cultural uses, and:
Ø
Create a
downtown cultural district for the development of Arts Alleys, bounded by
Ø
Make
necessary adjustments in zoning in the downtown cultural district to permit and
encourage arts and cultural activities in the Arts Alleys.
Ø
Negotiate
with downtown property owners and businesspersons to use the vacant and
underutilized space fronting the Arts Alleys and consider offering a financial
incentive, such as a property tax abatement on the portion of the properties used for arts purposes, to
encourage landlords to maintain affordable rents on the properties.
Ø
Work with
the designers of the new parking structures to ensure that the areas fronting
the alleys support the Arts Alleys concept.
18.
Commit to a cultural use of the
Ø
Approach
development of the Civic Auditorium as a key component within a larger cultural
campus encompassing the
Ø
Create a plan
for the development of the Civic Auditorium that assesses the options identified
in this planning process, and presents specific recommendations for
implementation.
Ø
Revisit
the recommendations regarding the Civic Auditorium in the
19. Develop, or facilitate the development of, small, flexible and affordable performance venues (under 500 seats) and visual arts spaces.
20. Develop policies and ordinances that encourage and even mandate the creation of affordable artist live/work and day studio spaces in new residential and industrial development at a minimum in the Light Manufacturing Studio District (LMSD).
21.
Retain and enhance current concentrations of arts
uses at the Pier, Bergamot Station, the
22.
Support and enhance cultural development around
nodes, such as the emerging cultural uses along
Cultural Funding
23. Work to increase the total amount of the City’s Cultural Funding program budget towards a benchmark of 10% of the total operating budgets of Santa Monica’s arts organizations.
24. Create new cultural support opportunities as follows:
Ø
Expand and
restructure the current Cultural/Arts Organization Support Grant Program to
ensure separate review of arts applicants and cultural heritage applicants, and
implement procedural refinements.
Ø
Create an Artists
Fellowship Program to support and recognize
Ø
Create an
organizational capacity building and technical assistance program to encourage
appropriate institutionalization of
Ø
Create an
Ø
Create a Capital
Grants Program to assist nonprofit arts and cultural organizations in meeting
their facility needs, and to encourage capacity building.
25.
Explore
options to best reflect and support
26. Explore ways to enhance community access to cultural funding programs, while improving administrative effectiveness, through such tools as e-granting, on-line data collection, and collective insurance for grantees.
Leadership
27.
Reactivate the
28. Provide in-kind support and seed-funding to the Foundation to enable it to provide increased community cultural leadership.
29. Focus the Foundation’s efforts as follows:
Ø
Expand the
pool of resources available for cultural uses by developing a workplace giving
program to encourage cultural giving by private individuals, and a united arts
fund to encourage cultural giving by local businesses and corporations.
Ø
Institute
an annual arts leadership awards program, recognizing leading citizens in the
areas of philanthropy, business and volunteerism.
Ø
Create an
active program of leadership development, in cooperation with the Chamber of
Commerce, or other civic or business group.
30. Strengthen the capacity of the Arts Commission to fulfill its role in implementing Creative Capital as follows:
Ø Explore a reduction in the size of the Arts Commission to facilitate effectiveness and flexibility, while retaining the current use of subcommittees that include non-commissioners to provide opportunities for wider community involvement.
Ø Alter the composition requirements of the Arts Commission to balance the need for qualifications in cultural policy and advocacy with the need for professional arts qualifications.
Ø
Work to diversify the membership of the Arts
Commission to more accurately reflect the demographic diversity of
Implementation
Full implementation of the plan will require the
participation of the City and community partners as well as new resources, both
public and private. The plan includes
details on the initial steps associated with each recommendation as well as a
preliminary estimate of related costs.
The first five years are also summarized in the table below,
organized by year, with the items that can be started with little or no new
resources appearing in italics. In most cases, full implementation will however
be contingent upon new resources, public or private, and/or new partnerships.
|
Implementation
by Year |
|
Start year for
implementation, including recommendation number |
|
|
|
Ongoing |
|
1. Individual artists recognition |
|
2. Theme of innovation |
|
11.
Integration of cultural programs in non-traditional venues |
|
14. Arts
education cooperation |
|
19. Small-scale venues |
|
21. Retention
& enhancement of current arts uses |
|
30. Arts
Commission diversification |
|
|
|
Year One (2007/08) |
|
3.
Partnerships for innovative cultural programming |
|
7. Partnerships
for lifelong learning |
|
8. Ongoing festivals |
|
15. Private developer fee program implementation |
|
18. Civic auditorium plan |
|
17. Arts
Alleys—zoning |
|
20. Artists Live/Work |
|
22. Cultural development around nodes— |
|
25. Cultural
diversity options |
|
30. Arts
Commission restructuring |
|
|
|
Year Two (2008/09) |
|
4. Creative
Santa Monica Directory |
|
9. New festival (“Glow”) |
|
|
|
13. Seniors’
programming |
|
17. Arts Alleys—create district |
|
24. Restructured/new cultural funding programs |
|
25. New funding programs |
|
26. Grants program enhancements |
|
27. Santa Monica Arts Foundation plan |
|
|
|
Year Three (2009/10) |
|
5. Communitywide marketing program |
|
6. Explore electronic communication |
|
10. Small-scale festivals |
|
28. Santa Monica Arts Foundation implementation of
plan |
|
|
|
Year Four (2010/11) |
|
16. Public art program assessment |
|
24. Capital grants |
|
29. Santa Monica Arts Foundation—fundraising |
|
|
|
Year Five (2011/12) |
|
23. Cultural funding benchmark |
|
17. Arts Alleys—downtown parking structures |
Previous Council Actions
In February 2006,
Council approved award of a contract in the amount of $90,000 to the Cultural +
Planning Group, a Los Angeles based firm with extensive national experience in
the development of cultural plans, to produce a community cultural plan that
would identify Santa Monica’s priorities in terms of the arts and culture, as
well as the methods for achieving these objectives. Over the course of
the last year, two information items highlighted the plan’s progress and an
initial draft of the plan was circulated in early December.
Commission Action
The
Arts Commission held four public hearings on the community cultural plan during
the course of its development. In addition
at its meeting on February 5th, 2007 the Arts Commission reviewed
the final draft of the plan and voted unanimously to enthusiastically endorse
it and recommend its adoption to Council.
Alternatives
Council could adopt the plan in its entirety or could elect to adopt it
with exceptions or provisions regarding specific findings or
recommendations. Prior to adopting the
community cultural plan, Council could also require further study or research
on some topic or finding in the plan, which might require the allocation of additional
resources.
Public Outreach
Extensive
community outreach, input and review have been a hallmark of the Creative Capital planning process. In addition to the four public hearings held
by the Art Commission, there were fourteen different public meetings and topic
oriented workshops held to discuss the plan in which over two hundred people
participated. The draft was widely
distributed in December and made available through the project’s website. Staff also made presentations to five
neighborhood associations and solicited feedback at a special meeting of
representatives of all the City Boards and Commissions.
Budget/Financial Impact
Full implementation of the plan is envisioned as a joint responsibility of the City and a number of partner entities. While the City will play a major role, this is a community cultural plan meaning that it is derived from the entire community and will be implemented in partnership with agencies and individuals from the community. The plan contains a section on implementation that details the initial steps associated with each recommendation, lead agencies or partners, and a preliminary cost estimate.
It is important to note that the pace and sequence of implementation envisioned in the plan is contingent upon the availability of sufficient staff, funding and other resources. Implementation of the portions of the plan that require additional City resources is contingent on Council’s appropriation of additional funds and will have to be prioritized among other City requests for additional resources.
Prepared by:
Jessica
Cusick, Cultural Affairs Manager
|
Approved: |
|
Forwarded to Council: |
|
|
|
|
|
Barbara
Stinchfield Director, Community and Cultural Services Department |
|
P. City
Manager |