City Council Meeting: April 24, 2007

Agenda Item: 8-A  

To:                   Mayor and City Council 

From               Kathryn Vernez, Assistant to the City Manager for Community and Government Relations

 

Subject:          Legislative Positions on State Housing Legislation

 

 

Recommended Action

Staff recommends the City Council take support positions on a variety of State housing proposals.

 

Executive Summary

The City has a long history of legislative advocacy on housing issues that assist in preserving and providing affordable housing and protecting tenant rights. Several bills related to these issues have been introduced in the State Legislature. City Council review and support of these measures is requested. In addition, other legislative proposals are under review by City staff, the State lobbyists and the appropriate City Commissions and maybe brought to Council for action in the future.

Discussion

Background

On April 10, 2007, Councilmember Kevin McKeown requested support for a variety of State legislative housing measures. This report evaluates the measures through a coordinated interdepartmental approach.

 

SB 464 (Kuehl) – Ellis Act: Preventing Speculators from Taking Advantage of Renters

Through “Ellis Act” rights, property owners may leave the rental business, in the process evicting tenants from the property notwithstanding any local rent control laws. SB 464 limits the ability to exercise these rights to cases where the owner has owned the property for at least five years. The bill would also extend the time period given to tenants to vacate the property from 120 days to one year, if there is at least one senior or disabled person eligible to request that extension.

 

Staff Comments:

SB 464 is intended to reduce real property speculation in the rental market and forestall the further loss of the affordable housing stock. The bill’s sponsor, the Western Center on Law and Poverty, asserts that SB 464’s five-year holding requirement would have affected almost 79% of the buyers who withdrew from the rental market Statewide in the last five years and would have prevented (or delayed) loss of 16,000 affordable housing units. Since 2002, Los Angeles lost 12,000 units and Santa Monica lost 454 units. More than 60% of the owners withdrawing their units from the Santa Monica rental market since 2002 had owned the property less than five years. In 2005, 95% of the owners exercising their “Ellis Act rights” had owned the property for less than five years. The provision providing one year to relocate for all tenants in qualifying situations would increase the personal safety and building security for vulnerable seniors or disabled persons who are often the only tenants left in a building after all of the other tenants have vacated.  With affordable housing shrinking and homelessness unacceptably high, state intervention is required.

 

Staff recommends support for SB 464.

 

SB 900 (Corbett) – Mobile Home Park Conversion

SB 900 eliminates removal of rent control on mobile home park conversions by repealing the existing exemption to the Subdivision Map Act. The bill deletes existing law that prescribes the process for avoiding the displacement of nonpurchasing residents when subdividing a mobilehome park into individual, resident-owned lots, leaving the mitigation of impacts from these conversions on nonpurchasing residents to individual local governments.

 

Staff Comments:

This measure provides local government approval/disapproval, protections and mitigations to mitigate adverse impacts of any mobilehome park conversion so that displaced residents will be able to find adequate space in a mobilehome park.

 

Staff recommends support for SB 900.

AB 607 (Brownley) – Residential Hotels: Locking Mail Receptacles

AB 607 mandates lockable mailboxes for each residential unit, including low and very low income residential hotels.

 

Staff Comments:

This bill requires provision of residential hotel units with a locking mailbox acceptable to the US Post office, enhancing the habitability of residential hotels for all residents. AB 607 also authorizes local governments to make and enforce ordinances that provide greater protections with respect to habitability of residential units, effectively making any residential unit without a locking mail receptacle uninhabitable.

 

Staff recommends support for SB 607.

 

AB 641 (Torrico) - Developer Fees

AB 641 prohibits local agencies from collecting locally-imposed developer fees prior to the date of final inspection or the date the certificate of occupancy is issued (whichever comes first) for units reserved for low income households.

 

Staff Comments:

AB 641 provides a “time of payment” benefit for the construction of low income housing produced by non-profit developers such that fees are not required to be paid until the date of final inspection, or the date the certificate of occupancy is issued whichever comes first. Therefore the bill gives fee deferral incentives to low income housing produced by non-profit developers.

 

Staff recommends support for AB 641.

 

AB 864 (Davis) – Substandard Buildings: New Ownership Interest

AB 864 requires that any entity acquiring ownership interest in a property with uncorrected substandard building violations report the change in ownership to the enforcement agency upon completion of sale or closure of escrow.  Failure to comply with reporting requirements would be considered a misdemeanor subject to fines and/or imprisonment.

 

Staff Comments:

AB 864 makes failure to comply with reporting requirements a misdemeanor, thereby ensuring that building code enforcement agencies are able to continue enforcement efforts effectively.

 

Staff recommends support for AB 864.

 

AB 987 (Jones) – Low & Moderate Income Housing Fund: Affordability Covenants & Restrictions

AB 987 allows for more strict enforcement of low income housing covenants on redevelopment projects, such that the covenants and restrictions be enforceable by a person or family of low or moderate income.

 

Staff Comments:

This bill would apply two additional requirements upon the Redevelopment Agency (“Agency”) to ensure that units developed or assisted by moneys from Housing Set-Aside Funds (“Housing Funds”) remain affordable.  The first requirement, the recording provision, seeks to improve notification of affordability requirements by requiring, concurrent with the recordation of the covenants, the recording of a separate and more easily identifiable document that solely recites the nature and duration of affordability restrictions.  The second requirement, preparation of a list of covenants and restrictions, involves annually compiling and updating an inventory of existing affordability covenants and restrictions on all parcels and units that were developed or otherwise assisted with Housing Funds for public information.  In addition to these requirements, AB 987 includes a legal standing provision, which provides low to moderate income persons, with a direct interest in the housing, as actual or potential tenants or owners, the ability to bring an action to enforce the covenant.  

 

The Western Center on Law and Poverty (sponsor) and other housing advocates contend these amendments are necessary because: 1) Under the existing system, affordability covenants are too often buried in the longer recording instruments; 2) Despite current recording requirements, subsequent buyers may purchase restricted properties unaware of affordability restrictions and breach restrictions without penalties; and 3) Under existing law, only the redevelopment agency or some other public entity has standing to enforce affordability covenants but some are reluctant or unable to enforce these covenants. 

 

Currently, the Agency’s existing policies and procedures concerning affordable housing developments include recording regulatory agreements, which specifically reference affordability covenants and restrictions, and monitoring of affordable units and tenant incomes, which are conducted by the City’s Housing Division.  Since the additional requirements of AB 987 can be implemented without difficulty and because the Agency desires to support initiatives which seek to preserve affordable housing, staff recommends a support position on this bill.

 

Staff recommends support for AB 987.

 

AB 1542 (Evans) – Mobilehome Parks: Conversions

AB 1542 provides greater protection of displaced tenants in conversions of mobilehome parks to condominium properties by deleting a provision of an existing law that exempted this type of conversion from a requirement to find adequate replacement space for non-purchasing residents.

 

Staff Comments

AB 1542 ensures that property owners will not be able to circumvent rent control regulations during conversions of rental mobilehome parks to resident-owned properties.

 

Staff recommends support for AB 1542.

 

Summary

This series of legislation will work to strengthen tenant rights and preservation of affordable housing efforts.

 

Budget/Financial Impact

There is no financial impact for the City associated in taking these legislative positions.

 

 

Prepared by:

Bob Moncrief, Housing & Redevelopment Manager

Kathryn Vernez, Assistant to the City Manager for Community & Government Relations

 

 

Approved:

 

Forwarded to Council:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kathryn Vernez

Assistant to the City Manager for Community & Government Relations

 

P. Lamont Ewell

City Manager