City Council Meeting: November 13, 2007

Agenda Item: 7-B

 

 

To:                   Mayor and City Council 

From:              Eileen Fogarty, Director of Planning and Community Development

Subject:          Resolution Making Findings Of Local Climatic, Geological And Topographical Conditions As Required To Adopt Local Amendments To The California Building Standards Code; Adoption of the California Building Standards Code And Santa Monica Amendments To The California Building Standards Code

 

 

Recommended Action

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution making findings of local climatic, geological and topographical conditions as required to adopt local amendments to the California Building Standards Code, and adopt the attached ordinance that adopts the California Building Standards Code and Santa Monica amendments to the California Building Standards Code.

 

               

Executive Summary

 

The 2007 Edition of the California Building Standards Code is recommended for adoption.  In order to do so, Council is required to make certain findings. (See Attachment A) This is also an opportunity to adopt local amendments to the Code to address local climatic, geological, and topographical conditions.  Attachment B sets forth the new Code edition along with Santa Monica Amendments.  The proposed amendments were presented to the Building & Safety Commission and discussed in detail in two separate meetings. The Commission unanimously approved all amendments included in the proposed ordinance.

 

There is no immediate impact on the General Fund associated with this item outside of costs associated with updating the codes book.  Costs Associated with updating code book/electronic code references will be absorbed within the department’s adopted budget. As with any code revision, there may be impacts on future city projects.

 

Discussion

Background

Pursuant to the Health and Safety Code, the California Building Standards Code applies throughout the State of California. This set of building standards incorporates by reference various model codes with amendments created by interested State agencies. Once the California Building Standards Commission publishes these amended codes, all cities and counties within California must follow the published standards 180 days after publication, unless the local jurisdiction amends these standards as allowed by law.

 

During the period between publication of the California Building Standards Code and mandatory local enforcement, cities and counties may make amendments based on local topographical, geological and climatic concerns. For amendments to be effective, the local governing body must make specific findings that any one or more of the aforementioned concerns is applicable, approve an ordinance adopting the amendments and file a copy of the express findings and local ordinance with the Building Standards Commission. These requirements apply to both new and previously adopted local amendments.

 

Local Amendments to the California Building Standards Code

Staff recommends certain local amendments designed to increase fire and structural seismic safety protection - to address issues not adequately addressed by the new 2007 standards - be adopted to protect life safety and minimize property damage for the public and citizens of Santa Monica. A summary of the chronology of development of the new codes and amendments is  as follows:

 

(a) The National Movement in Codes and Standards Development: The codes and standards adopted in this cycle are the culmination of many years of recent research funded primarily by FEMA through the National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program (NEHRP) and industries such as steel, concrete and wood manufacturers. Prior to the development of the International Building Code (IBC), slated for adoption by reference in California,  there were three regional codes representing the east, south and western United States. The Uniform Building Code (UBC), which was used in the western region, was by far the most advanced code in terms of structural and seismic design.

 

The IBC was intended to provide improvement over the existing codes by uniformly applying the latest code provisions to the entire country. Seismic design application was expanded and mandated across the country to address the potential hazards in many localities. In lieu of seismic zones used in the UBC, which covered broad geographical areas, detailed seismic maps were generated by the US Geological Survey that can estimate the expected ground acceleration to much higher level of accuracy based on street address, which are then used for generation of seismic forces for a specific structure. However, as part of this national movement, California engineers lost much clout and involvement in promulgating the new seismic standards. This resulted in some of the seismic provisions being watered down compared to the standards in the UBC, which are currently being enforced in California.  

 

(b) The Need For Local Amendments: The proposed local amendments are necessary due to a number of unique local conditions detailed in the attached resolution.  (See Attachment A).  Of particular note are the seismic conditions.  The Safety Element of the City’s General Plan, adopted in January 1995, showed a high risk of seismic activity in the City due to the close proximity to the Santa Monica-Malibu Coast fault, the Newport-Inglewood fault and the San Andreas Fault.  It also discussed the damaging effect local seismic activity from the two branches of the Santa Monica Fault would have on buildings, and the related potential demands on emergency services needs.  Since then, three major new studies were performed by the local geological and structural engineering communities. Professor John Hall of Caltech recently published results of his analysis of a typical steel framed building subjected to an expected LA basin seismic ground motion. The result predicted formation of a collapse mechanism in the early cycles of ground motion simulation. In addition, The Applied Technology Council (ATC) recently completed a draft of research report ATC-63, which concluded that the prescribed minimum seismic design force, could lead to the collapse of many structures. A third  recent development was the extensive testing of braced frame systems for seismic force resistance by Professor Stephen Mahin at the University of California Berkeley which  showed premature fracture of steel tubes used as braces.

 

(c) The Collaborative Program For Developing Local Uniform Amendments: The City of Santa Monica Building and Safety Division, in cooperation with major jurisdictions in the region such as City of Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety, Los Angeles County Building and Safety Division, the City of Long Beach Department of Planning and Building continued their efforts to create uniformity of Building Codes and regulation in the entire Los Angeles region. Over 58 jurisdictions actively participated in formulation and implementation of this program, and the process received support from 85 jurisdictions representing over 98% of the population in Los Angeles County plus the Structural Engineers Association of Southern California.  The proposed amendments were distributed to a wide audience over the past several months including the Structural Engineering Associations committees such as, Seismology, Steel, Light Frame Construction, Quality Assurance and Building Code Committees; design professionals in the construction/engineering industry, and other interested groups or individuals.  Thus, while the proposed local amendments are based on Santa Monica’s unique conditions, these proposals will also be consistent with the building, plumbing, mechanical and electrical codes in most of the jurisdictions in the region.  The reduction in variations among local jurisdictions results in a more efficient sub regional environment in which to design and construct buildings.

 

(d) Summary of Amendments: Many of the previous local amendments to the California Code were deemed unnecessary since these requirements have been already incorporated in the new State standards. These items are shown as stricken out in Attachment B. Some of the amendments enacted during the 1999 and 2002 code adoption cycle continue to be necessary  for local adoption to protect the community from the hazards of fires and earthquakes. The following is a list of the proposed local amendments to the California Building Standards Code. To distinguish between new amendments and those existing amendments requiring readoption, the word “Continue” precedes the existing amendments.

 

Construction Quality Control

1.                  Add requirements for special inspection for one and two-family dwellings when items of specialty construction are used. Also, add provisions limiting construction of footings without special inspection in order to maintain the current level of quality control in construction (see Section 8.08.100).

2.                  Continue to require the engineer or architect of record to verify that their structural designs are followed during construction by making periodical field observation of the seismic elements of the building (see Section 8.08.120).

New Codes and Structural Design Standards

1.                  Adopt necessary standards referenced in the code (see Section 8.12.030).

Geotechnical Reports

1.                  Continue the designation of Seismic Hazard Zones and Geologic Hazard Filled Area Zones in the City to require special design features (see Section 8.12.050).

Fire Retardant Roofing

1.                  Continue to prohibit the use of non-fire retardant wood shingles or non-fire retardant wood shakes for new or replacement roofing and require a moderate level of fire retardant roofing as a minimum standard (see section 9.12.070).

General Seismic Design Provisions

1.                  Add provisions to ensure adequate seismic detailing for walls, roofs and floors in irregularly shaped buildings (see Section 8.16.020).

2.                  Increase the minimum seismic load considered in the design of buildings since the new code reduces such design load to a level that could potentially lead to collapse in certain types of structures. The amendment increases this minimum load to a level consistent with current code and that of California’s Field act, which was enacted in 1933 (see Section 8.16.020).

3.                  Add provisions to increase structural stability for essential facilities, such as police and fire stations (see Section 8.16.020).

4.                  Continue current amendments regarding special seismic anchorage of wood roof and floor diaphragms to concrete and masonry walls.  In addition, relax some provisions that have been proven by recent research and testing to be overly restrictive (see Section 8.16.020).

5.                  Add provisions to require sufficient separation between adjacent buildings and between buildings and property lines in order to prevent pounding of buildings during a seismic event (see Section 8.16.020).

6.                  Limit the height of buildings to two stories when different seismic force resisting systems are allowed to be mixed without penalties (see Section 8.16.020).

7.                  Add provisions for calculations of dynamic period for buildings using a new seismic force resisting system (see Section 8.16.020).

Foundations

1.                  Add provisions for construction of stepped footings on sloped lots and require continuous footings for interior load-bearing walls (see Section 8.16.030).

2.                  Delete prescriptive provisions in the code, which would allow construction of inadequate reinforced concrete and masonry basement walls up to 10 feet in height (see Section 8.16.030).

Concrete Construction

1.                  Add earthquake design provisions that maintain the current level of seismic detailing used in concrete tilt-up wall construction (see Section 8.16.020).

2.                  Add provisions to maintain critical seismic detailing provisions in current code pertaining to concrete columns, walls and slabs (see Section 8.16.040).

Fireplaces

1.                  Continue to require all masonry and concrete chimneys to be structurally designed by a licensed architect or registered engineer instead of using prescriptive rules that have allowed failed performance in recent earthquakes (see Section 8.16.050).

Steel Construction

1.                  Prohibit the use of hollow steel tubes as bracing members unless they are filled with concrete or grout in order to prevent fracture of such critical elements in steel building frame systems (see Section 8.16.060).

Wood Construction

1.                  Continue to amend provisions for wood framed construction, which limit the use of materials that have proved ineffective or have not been sufficiently tested in resisting earthquake forces.  In addition, relax some provisions that have been proven by recent research and testing to be overly restrictive (see section 8.16.070).

2.                  Continue to limit the length of floors projecting beyond the supporting wall on lower level when using a simplified analysis (see Section 8.16.020).

3.                  Continue to provide for special additional requirements for hillside buildings (see Chapter 8.20).

Electrical Provisions

1.                  Continue to ensure that any wiring not having metal protection over the conductors shall be entirely concealed within the building structure to prevent and inhibit tampering and restrict the use of aluminum wiring found to be hazardous (see Section 8.24.030).

2.                  Continue to prohibit the sale and use of any electrical material, device, or equipment unless it complies with provisions of this section, including rating and conformance with national standards (see Section 8.24.040).

3.                  Continue to provide regulations for temporary service poles used on construction sites (see Section 8.24.060)

4.                  Continue to provide regulations for underground concrete vaults and handholes (see Section 8.24.070).

5.                  Continue to require proper disconnecting means for multiple arrays on solar photovoltaic systems (see Section 8.24.080).

Plumbing Provisions

1.                  Continue to require enclosures of water heaters to prevent associated fire hazards from uncontrolled adjacent combustible storage (see Section 8.32.030).

2.                  Continue to prohibit water softener systems from using drywells to discharge effluents in order to protect local ground water and the Santa Monica Bay (see Section 8.32.040).

3.                  Continue to prohibit the use of combined storm drain and sewers to prevent the possible future contamination of the Santa Monica Bay (see Section 8.32.050).

4.                  Continue to provide standards for waterless urinals (see Section 8.32.060).

Fire Code

1.                  Adopt the 2007 California Fire Code published by the International Code Council and the California Building Standards Commission with errata, together with those portions of the International Fire Code, 2006 Edition, including, Appendix Chapters 1, B and D. as modified and the most recent referenced version as adopted by the State of California of the “National Fire Codes”  published by the National Fire Protection Association, and the local amendments of Chapter 8.44 are adopted as part of the Fire Code of the City of Santa Monica

2.                  Continue to require automatic fire extinguishing and detection systems in all new construction and when there is a change in use to a higher classification (see Section 8.44.050).

3.                  Continue for require automatic fire sprinkler systems for existing public assembly spaces above 5,000 square feet that protect assembly areas and exit ways (see Section 8.44.050).

4.                  Remove exemption of buildings used exclusively as open public garages and buildings owned by any public agency from the requirement of automatic fire sprinkler systems (see Section 8.44.050).

5.                  Continue to require compliance with the high-rise provisions of the California Building Code in new high-rise buildings with human occupancy above 55 feet of the lowest level of fire vehicle access point in accordance with authority granted to the City in the California Health and Safety Code Section 13216 (see Section 8.44.090).

6.                  Continue to require the connection with control valves on each floor level with full automatic sprinkler systems in any new building with floors more than 55 feet in height (see Section 8.44.090).

7.                  Continue to require adequate seismic bracing of fire sprinkler installations (see Section 8.44.120).

Window Guardrail Safety

1.         Continue to require guardrails for openable windows with low sill height (see Section 8.12.060).

Green Building Provisions

1.         Continue to require new buildings subject to the provisions of the chapter to be built with a minimum of four major construction materials that have a post-consumer recycled content (see Section 8.108.030).

2.         Continue to require additional mandatory energy efficiency measures for Solar Water Heating, Pipe Insulation and Heat Traps in all buildings (see Section 8.108.040).

 

 

Commission Action

On August 21, 2007, the Building and Safety Commission met to consider the new code and the state laws that affect local adoption of building standards. After explaining the code adoption process, staff presented the draft report that included all new proposed amendments and sought Commission direction. Staff presented each separate item and the complete reasoning for the amendment in detail. The Commission suggested several modifications that were consequently included in the proposed ordinance. The Commission also requested another meeting to allow an absent member of the Commission who is also a licensed structural engineer to provide further input.

 

On August 28, 2007, the Commission, with all its members present, again reviewed and discussed each amendment in detail and provided suggestions for further clarification on content and language of the  proposed ordinance.  The Commission unanimously moved to recommend the City Council adopt the staff proposed ordinance with further minor modifications that were consequently included in the attached ordinance.

 

Environmental Analysis

The City’s adoption of the California Building Standards Code and the local amendments to this code is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061(b)(3) [project is exempt when it can be determined with certainty that there is no potential for causing a significant effect on the environment].  The proposed ordinance establishes standards for the design and construction of buildings and structures which, in part, incorporate the most current and applicable seismic attenuation methods and fire life safety design regulations into the City’s building standards, based on the unique geological, topographical and climatic conditions of the City (as detailed in the resolution accompanying the ordinance).  The standards are designed to provide increased structural protection and seismic integrity thereby protecting the occupants of these structures and the public from safety risks, preventing damage to the structures, and minimizing the demand on emergency fire services.

 

 

Budget/Financial Impact

There is no direct budget and financial impact to the City of adopting the 2007 edition of the California Building Standards Code and local amendments. As a result of the standards for seismic and fire life safety, the approval of this ordinance will increase costs of construction and repair to certain structures, including City-owned structures. The specific costs and cost sharing arrangements for City structure repairs that might be mandated by the standards are not known at this time. Council will have the opportunity to review such costs and cost sharing arrangements when repair contracts are placed on Council’s agenda.

 

Prepared by:                       Jim Hone, Fire Chief

                                                 Fady Mattar, PE, CBO, Interim Building Official

 

Approved:                                                                            Forwarded to Council:

 

 

 

Eileen Fogarty, PCD                                                            Lamont Ewell

Director                                                                                  City Manager

 

Attachment A:            Resolution Making Findings of Local Climatic, Geological and Topographical Conditions As Required To Adopt Local Amendments To The California Building Standards Code

 

Attachment B:            Ordinance Adopting The California Building Standards Code And Adopting The Santa Monica Amendments To The California Building Standards Code