City Council Meeting: November
25, 2008
Agenda Item: 1-C
To: Mayor and City Council
From:
Subject: Proposal to Amend the State Water Code
Recommended
Action
Staff recommends that
staff work with its
Executive
Summary
The City continues to promote
water efficiency and conservation through its Sustainable City Plan, its 20%
water use reduction goal by 2010, and various water-saving incentive
programs. The City has achieved outstanding
savings in indoor water efficiency.
However exterior water saving efforts, such as rainwater harvesting and
stormwater use, dry weather runoff reuse for landscapes and even interior uses,
have been hampered by a lack of legal authority in the State water code.
The
Background
Since the early 1990s, the City
has implemented a Sustainable City Plan (SCP) to promote sustainable uses of
natural resources, including water. SCP
implementation involves the promotion and installation of interior water
efficiency devices, such as toilets, showerheads, aerators, and washing
machines, with over 50,000 such devices installed. The City has also expanded interior
efficiency programs for hotels and motels, restaurants, and medical and
health-care related facilities. The SCP
goal for water is to achieve a 20% reduction in water use from the 2000 level
by 2010, a reduction of approximately 250,000 gallons per day. To date the City has achieved a 2% reduction,
largely due to these programs which address interior water use. This reduction
has been tempered by an increase of thousands of residents, housing units and
jobs since year 2000. However, staff
feels the benefits from these interior incentives programs have plateaued and
that meeting the 20% reduction goal will require an aggressive program to
reduce exterior water use in the community.
The City is highly dependent on
imported water – the third most dependent of Metropolitan Water District’s
member agencies. Although MWD has a diverse supply of water resources, severe
drought conditions in
Depending upon land use,
approximately 40-75% of total water use in
Discussion
Currently untapped local water
supplies that could help reduce potable water use include rain water and dry
weather urban runoff. If the City were
to harvest all rain water that falls within its boundaries, in an average year,
approximately 35% of its water needs would be satisfied locally. This would reduce by the same amount the
purchase of imported potable water from distant watersheds while surpassing the
City’s 20% water use reduction goal.
However, the State water code only defines recycled and gray water
resources as acceptable supplies for reuse.
Recycled water is narrowly defined as wastewater put through high levels
of treatment and disinfection, and used for landscape spray irrigation. Gray water comes from bathroom sinks, washing
machines, showers, and tubs, and currently can only be used with sub-surface
irrigation systems. While gray water is
a permitted water supply in the City, the regulatory system is complicated,
discouraging, and not economical or user-friendly. No definitions or guidelines for rain water,
storm water, and dry weather runoff are found in the code, which would allow
for their practical use and reuse, and transparent regulatory management.
The void in the State water code
is resulting in annual water resources being wasted at a time when such waste
is unacceptable. The present regulatory
system discourages the use of these other water resources, and in some ways
puts up impediments to such use; the code is not promoting sustainability. By
updating the State water code to include the use of all available water
resources in safe and efficient interior and exterior systems, the public will
have more options for using all local water resources. The City is the perfect entity to lead this
effort, as it has in the past for water efficient toilets and urban runoff
management, by introducing legislation to update the water code to promote
sustainable uses of other non-potable water resources.
Financial Impacts &
Budget Actions
There are no immediate budget actions
required for the approval of the recommended action. However, should the need arise to address
additional costs or savings, staff will incorporate the changes in the
subsequent Proposed Budget or report back to Council in another report.
Prepared by:
Neal Shapiro,
Sr. Admin Analyst
|
Approved: |
|
Forwarded to Council: |
|
|
|
|
|
Director
- Office of Sustainability & the Environment Reviewed
by: Lee Swain |
|
City Manager |