City Council
Meeting: July 14, 2009
Agenda Item: 8-A
To: Mayor and City Council
From:
Subject: Exposition
Light Rail Phase 2 - Recommendation for Alternative Siting
of Maintenance Facility within the City of
Recommended Action
Staff
recommends that City Council:
1.
Authorize
the City Manager to work with the Exposition Construction Authority (Expo) to
continue to explore an alternate location for the required Phase 2 light rail
maintenance facility, as indicated in the attached conceptual diagram
(Attachment A). Such an alternative
might include a component west of
2.
Request the Expo to include this alternate
site in the final EIR analysis and continue negotiations related to mitigating
community adjacency issues. Currently,
the Exposition Light Rail Phase 2 Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) identifies
the entire Verizon site in
3.
Direct
City staff to work with the Expo Construction Authority and other agencies on
grade crossing, layout and financial issues associated with the newly proposed
sites. Efforts will include discussion with Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority (Metro), the California Public Utilities Commission
(CPUC) and Santa Monica College (SMC).
4.
Direct
City staff to analyze options and work with Expo to meet the applicable
relocation needs of businesses and
5.
Direct
staff to work with the Expo Authority to minimize the visual and environmental
impacts of the maintenance facility and enhance its aesthetic interface with
the community.
6.
Direct
staff to work with the Expo Authority to ensure the final budget for the Expo
Phase 2 project includes compensation to the City for use of the City-owned
property on
Executive Summary
The Exposition Light Rail (Expo
LR) Phase 2 Environmental
Impact Report (DEIR) is being finalized.
The Exposition Construction Authority will be
making the final decisions about the project in consultation with the funding
and operating agency, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation
Authority. Although the regional
agencies are responsible for deciding on the final project, the agencies will
be seeking guidance from the City of
·
Possible Alternative Site for
Proposed Maintenance Yard: Following a presentation by the Expo Construction Authority, the
City Council expressed concern about locating the proposed maintenance yard
adjacent to a residential area. The City
requested the Expo Authority to continue looking for a more suitable location
elsewhere. The Expo Authority has met
with City staff many times and provided information regarding the many sites
they had considered during the project development process. Expo and City staff
agreed that a superior alternative site did not exist.
City staff and the Expo
Construction Authority have explored a possible alternative site for the
facility that may interface better with the surrounding community. The alternative utilizes the northern portion
of the Verizon site for rail car storage leaving the remainder of the site
opposite the existing residential on Exposition for additional residential or
other uses. In addition, use of
·
Direct
Staff on Continued Negotiation and Compensation to City for use of Property:
The project budget in the Phase 2 DEIR currently assumes that the Expo
project will acquire the Verizon site. The City is requesting that the
Expo Phase 2 budget be adjusted, as necessary, if the alternative site is
selected to include compensation, as appropriate and as may be agreed to, for
possible use of
Background
On February 10 and March 3, 2009 the City
Council held Study Sessions as first
steps toward developing the City’s recommendations to the Expo Authority and
Metro concerning the future Exposition light rail project within the City of
Santa Monica. The City also held a
community workshop on February 17th.
The Study Sessions and community workshop provided information about the
Expo Light Rail Phase 2 Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) released by the Expo Authority in late January 2009.
Consideration of a suitable site for the
required maintenance facility and the environmental and aesthetic interface
with the community are critical to the Land Use and Circulation Element (LUCE)
vision of the City’s future, as the light rail has the potential to transform
areas around transit stations and facilities into pedestrian-oriented walkable districts and must be “good neighbors” within the
dense urban environment. A large number
of residents adjacent to the proposed maintenance facility at the Verizon site
expressed their concerns to City Council with respect to potential impacts on
the neighborhood.
This report focuses on an alternative
location of the required maintenance facility for Phase 2 of Expo. When completed, the Expo Light Rail line will
connect
Discussion
Summary of Comments
on Maintenance Facility
The February
10th and
March 3,2009 City Council Study Session reports provide
detailed explanations of community comments and Council discussion on the
location of the maintenance facility.
Here follows a brief summary and illustrations of the alternative:
Proposed Maintenance
Yard
The DEIR included the
proposed maintenance yard just east of

Proposed Maintenance
Facility in the DEIR
To support the Expo
Line Phase 2 project, a maintenance facility is required, preferably on the
western end of the selected alignment. The Authority and its
environmental/engineering consultant extensively examined potential locations
within reasonable proximity to the alignment and narrowed the locations to 20
different sites. These sites were then screened down using established criteria
that consisted of location, shape, size, topography, access, ownership, and potential
environmental impacts. Most of the potential sites were eliminated in the first
round due to inadequate size. The remaining locations were then analyzed in
greater detail. Six of these sites were eliminated due to various reasons such
as engineering challenges, multiple parcel owners, and project development by
others of the site. The last site, Verizon property located in
The proposed
maintenance facility for Expo Line Phase 2 is basically a storage site for the
Expo Line train vehicle fleet along with supporting capability to maintain the
fleet. The facility would be operational 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The
train vehicle storage would be located outside on the trackway
that directly connects to the main line tracks and would accommodate 1 to 3
car-consists. The proposed maintenance functions consist of basic cleaning of both the inside
and outside of the vehicles for daily operation along with some longer term
activities, such as vehicle repairs, which would take place in the two-story
shop structure. Also within the shop structure would be offices for Metro
employees, operation center, storage, and various shops to support the maintenance
activities. Also at this location would be a separate traction power substation
and employee parking. The Verizon site was the only remaining
location that met the criteria and was the ideal size.
Staff Hired Real
Estate and Design/Engineering Firms
City staff engaged the Maxima Group after
issuing an RFP for planning and real estate services to review potential sites
related to the required maintenance facility for the LRT Line, Phase 2.
The firm evaluated sites against the
criteria identified by the Expo Construction Authority’s and Metro (Attachment
B). A list of sites previously
identified by the Expo Authority as being potentially suitable for the
maintenance yard, along with any sites that might meet the agencies’ criteria
and were not considered previously, was re-evaluated by Maxima Group. The evaluation process included information
about ownership, existing uses, description of existing improvements, zoning
criteria and description of surrounding neighborhood. The analysis confirmed that there were no
other sites within the Phase 1 or Phase 2 areas that met the criteria,
particularly with respect to size and ownership.
In addition, staff issued an RFP for
preliminary conceptual planning and engineering of an alternate City site. Anil Verma Associates
was selected to review existing uses, provide a description for needed
improvements for any replacement functions and provide recommendations for
enhancing the adjoining area of the City so that an appropriate aesthetic
interface with adjacent land uses is achieved.
The consultant also provided input to the Expo Authority on proposed
layouts for the alternative sites.
Considerations included the functionality of the site in meeting Metro
operational requirements, California Public Utility Commission constraints,
compatibility of the maintenance yard with surrounding land uses, and
determining a layout that provides the least amount of negative impact.
Proposed “
Given the result of the survey to identify
another possible site within the Phase 2 area, and the Expo Authority’s and
Metro’s desire to locate a maintenance facility near the end of the line in
order to efficiently operate the line, the approach has been to explore whether
it is possible to develop an alternative that would move the facility away from
the residential neighborhood frontage.
Attachment A is a conceptual diagram of a possible layout.
·
The
maintenance functions (except the car wash), office-space and parking would be
moved west of
·
The
storage tracks and train washing facility would be located east of
·
Both sites are currently zoned
Light Manufacturing Studio District (LMSD) and the maintenance facility would
be a change in use.
Maintenance Shop and Yard Uses
The Maintenance Shop will be in operation 24
hours per day. The maximum total staff
planned to work at the facility is approximately 135 (operators, mechanics,
supervisors, etc.), spread out over a 24/7 schedule.
The work inside the shop is of a technical
nature and typically includes:
• Using computers to run tests on light rail vehicle (LRV)
on-board systems
• Making adjustments to electrical and electronic systems
• Replacing filters and light bulbs
• Replacing glass, floor coverings, and seating surfaces
• Changing brake shoes
• Wheel truing to restore the proper profile to the LRV wheels
• Change out and/or repair of LRT components such as trucks,
compressors, air conditioning
units, etc.
• In the Paint/Body shop, damaged panels may be removed and
replaced, some sheet metal cutting
and bending may occasionally happen (estimated use is 5% of the time), painting of parts or
panels (estimated 10% of time)
Storage Yard and Servicing
4:00
a.m. – 8:00 a.m.: Train operators arrive, pick up instructions
in the operations office, perform a safety inspection and then move the train
onto the mainline for service.
8:00
a.m. – 6:00 p.m.: Little activity occurs in the yard during
this period, with 85% - 90% of the vehicles gone from the yard. Vehicles scheduled for work in the
Maintenance Shop may be moved.
Approximately 6 – 10 cars per day may be moved, where crossing
6:00
p.m. – 2:00 a.m.: Vehicles return to the yard, stop at
cleaning platform for removal of bulk trash and then proceed through the car
wash facility. Washing may not be
performed every day; on days when washing is not done, the vehicles are sent
directly to a storage track. These moves
from the revenue service tracks and onto a storage track do not require
crossing
Car cleaning crews will service cars on the
storage tracks, performing light cleaning which includes washing windows and
other interior surfaces, and mopping floors.
The Exposition Construction Authority
followed up with Metro and the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to
anticipate and address operational and safety issues associated with this
alternative. Favorable responses were
provided by staff of both agencies.
Final determinations would be required from the PUC for the crossing and
Metro for the operational functions.
Expo has offered to host a community design charrette
to explore ways to mitigate noise, vibration and air quality concerns as well
as solicit input on the aesthetic interface with the surrounding neighborhood.
Attachment D includes potential conceptual diagrams in the neighborhood
setting.
Issues Requiring Further Analysis, Negotiations and Resolution
There are a number of issues that require additional discussion and negotiation
with the Exposition Construction Authority, including:
Budget/Financial
Impact
There is no budget impact from the recommendations of this report.
Following further study of this alternative, cost issues will be refined and
brought back for Council consideration.
Prepared by:
Kathryn Vernez,
Assistant to the City Manager, Community and Government Relations
|
Approved: |
|
Forwarded to Council: |
|
|
|
|
|
Kathryn Vernez Assistant
to the City Manager for Community and Government Relations |
|
City Manager |
Attachment A: Conceptual
Engineering: Alternative Maintenance
Yard Facility
Attachment B: Criteria for Site Feasibility
Attachment C: National Examples
– Maintenance Facilities
Attachment D: Conceptual
Diagrams in Neighborhood Setting
Criteria for Site
Feasibility
The Expo Authority and Metro are looking for a site
of at least six acres. The basic desirable site characteristics include:
·
Adjacency to the proposed alternative routes
·
Best if directly adjacent to alignment
·
Best if able to directly access site from both ends of the site via
trains
·
Good if not near a grade separation (aerial structure) along the LRT
alignment
·
A regular shape conducive to storage and maintenance track layout
and activities
·
Rectangular shape is common
·
Location in a commercial/industrial area with adjacent compatible uses.
·
Single Ownership or Limited Ownership Interests: Expo Authority prefers
to assemble a yard for the storage and maintenance facility from the fewest
number of property interests, and prefers to acquire a suitable site from only
one property interest.
·
Relatively flat topography
·
Good vehicular access
·
Easy access for employees and deliveries
Limited
environmental impact potential and appropriate zoning
Maintenance Activities/Specific needs
The facility is to be designed and built to meet
the maintenance needs of the LRT vehicles required to operate Phase 2 through
the year 2030. The following activities
would occur 24 hours a day in three shifts at the facility:
·
Outdoor storage for at least 20 to 36 LRT vehicles and associated
track (the hybrid is now storage for 44
cars)
o
Trains could be stored in 1, 2, or 3-car configuration thus the storage
tracks need to accommodate these lengths
·
Trackway to connect to the main line and allow the movement
of LRT vehicles from the main line track to and within the maintenance facility
area
o
This makes the direct adjacency ideal.
·
The Main yard shop structure would be approximately 300 feet long and
166 feet wide, two stories in height, and with a total area of approximately
125,000 square feet. The structure would
be built of concrete block or corrugated metal or a combination thereof (This
is based on other Maintenance sites.
There may be some flexibility on stories and building dimensions,
depending on the site).The Maintenance Yard would include the following
amenities:
o
Administrative Offices
o
o
Vehicle repair areas with maintenance pits, vehicle turntable, overhead
crane and open high-bay area
o
Component repair shops
o
Machine shop
o
Parts cleaning facility
o
Vehicle blowdown facility
o
Sheet metal shop
o
Welding shop
o
o
Pantograph shop
o
Wheel and axle shop
o
Underfloor wheel truing facility
o
Parts and equipment storage area
o
Paint and Body repair
·
Vehicle wash facility
·
Traction power substation
·
Parking for 65 to 70 employee automobiles
In order to determine the feasibility of an
alternate site, the Expo Authority will make additional engineering and
environmental consulting services available to the selected consultant
regarding the operational requirements of the light rail maintenance facility.