|
|
City
Council Report |
City Council Meeting: September
22, 2009
Agenda Item: 8-A
To: Mayor and City Council
From:
Subject: Authorization for City Manager to
Negotiate a Public/Private Partnership Agreement with the Nederlander
Organization for the Use and Programming of the
Recommended
Action
Staff recommends that the
City Council:
1. authorize the City Manager to negotiate an agreement with
the Nederlander Organization for the use and programming of the Civic
Auditorium
2. approve key negotiating parameters for this agreement
Executive
Summary
Both the Civic Center Specific
Plan (CCSP) and Creative Capital
place a high priority on renovation and upgrades to the landmark Santa Monica
Civic Auditorium. Creative Capital made it clear that the use and programming of the
Civic Auditorium should align with the community’s vision for its use, and that
options for revenue generation and private partnerships needed to be weighed
against an anticipated on-going public subsidy.
In exploring ways to renovate and reposition the Civic Auditorium as a
vital cultural hub within the
Background
The Civic Auditorium was designated a City Landmark by the
Landmarks Commission on November 12, 2001.
That decision was upheld by the City Council during its April 9, 2002
meeting.
In June 2005, the City of
Creative
Capital,
approved by City Council on February 27, 2007, committed the City to a cultural
use of the Civic Auditorium in line with the community’s vision for the
facility. That vision includes the need
for significant upgrades to the building and its technical equipment. Creative
Capital suggests that the recommendations regarding the Civic Auditorium in
the CCSP be revisited to better accommodate the cultural uses envisioned by the
community.
During the summer of 2008, capitalizing on the potential inherent
in concurrent development, staff from the City, the
In March of this year City Council authorized the issuance of an
RFQ to solicit qualifications from non-profit and/or for profit entities
interested in participating in a public/private partnership for the use and
programming of the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium (staff
report). Further, Council approved a
selection process and review criteria for responses, which included
demonstrated experience and degree of innovation, abilities on recent
comparable projects, financial capacity and understanding of the needs of this
project. In approving issuance of the
RFQ it was anticipated that staff would return to City Council to request
authorization to negotiate with one or more firm(s).
Discussion
RFQ Selection Process
The RFQ, issued in June 2009, was distributed widely and
advertised in both the local press and in trade publications. Due to demand from interested parties, four
tours of the facility were scheduled and staff issued three addenda in response
to inquiries. Despite this high level of
interest, only one organization submitted a response by the deadline.
A staff review committee met in early August and were impressed
with the depth and thoughtfulness of the Nederlander Organization’s
submittal. Committee members cited their
years of experience, financial capacity, expertise in working with historic
facilities and the public sector; as well as their national reputation for the
quality and breadth of their product, from Broadway productions to
concerts. For all of these reasons staff
felt the Nederlander Organization represents an excellent potential partner for
the City.
The Nederlander Organization, established almost 100 years ago, is
one of
Along with their statement of qualifications the Nederlander Organization
submitted a conceptual approach to programming that seems particularly well
aligned to community priorities. They
are proposing an exciting mix of Broadway shows, family entertainment, concerts
and special events, along with some innovative community partnerships. For example a ‘Pops’ concert series with the
Santa Monica Symphony or a musical theater school for young people in
partnership with local schools. Additional
details on their conceptual approach can be found in Attachment A.
Negotiating Parameters
If the City Council authorizes the City Manager to move forward,
staff is seeking guidance from Council on the focus of negotiation and public
benefits. Recommended parameters
include:
·
Ensure that the programming and operation of the
Civic Auditorium are financially sustainable over time
·
Maximize the number and diversity of high
quality cultural/entertainment options available at the Civic Auditorium
·
Ensure that sufficient capital investment will
be made to the facility to support its proposed use and ensure that adequate
reserves are projected to maintain the facility over time
·
Ensure that, as a result of this agreement,
existing staff at the Civic Auditorium maintain employment comparable to their
current employment status
·
Ensure that the Civic Auditorium will remain
available for community use
·
Ensure that any advertising or sponsorship
arrangements are compatible with City precedent and policies
·
Effectively manage the flow of people and uses
in the
Financial
Impacts & Budget Actions
The
five year forecast for the Civic Auditorium Fund underscores the need for a new
approach to the use and programming of the Civic Auditorium. The Civic Auditorium requires an ongoing annual General Fund subsidy of
$1.0 million in FY2009-10 and ranges between $1.1 to 1.3 million in FY2010-11
through FY2013-14. This baseline
forecast does not include major infrastructure improvements, which would
increase the subsidy. Five
Year Forecast
The
recommendations in this staff report have no immediate budgetary impacts;
however future budgetary impacts will likely result from negotiations with the
Nederlander Organization. The terms of the
agreement would likely require the City to contribute to the cost of
improvements and upgrades to the facility.
This past June, in adopting a plan for the future use of RDA funds, City
Council included 25M for Civic Auditorium improvements. All of these impacts
would be evaluated and presented to Council prior to final commitments.
|
Approved: |
|
Forwarded to Council: |
|
|
|
|
|
Director,
Community & Cultural Services |
|
P. City Manager |