CITY OF
CITY
PLANNING DIVISION
Item 7.12
DATE: May 1, 2006
TO: Architectural
Review Board
FROM: Planning Staff
SUBJECT: ARB 06-111,
Approval of Facade
Colors, Awnings and Sign Plans
APPLICANT: Lyle
Ecoff
PROPERTY OWNER: Horwitz
& Horwitz LLC
INTRODUCTION
The applicant requests Architectural
Review Board approval for new building color, awnings and signage for an
existing patio furniture store.
Approve with conditions.
C4 (Highway Commercial) District / None
The subject property is not listed on
the City’s Historic Resources Inventory.
The project is categorically exempt
from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant
to Section 15311 (a), Class 11, of the State Implementation CEQA Guidelines in
that the project involves the construction or replacement of minor accessory
structures (awnings and on the property signs) to existing commercial,
industrial or institutional facilities.
Relevant Permit History / Prior Action
(ARB)
ARB96-097: Staff approved reconstruction of south-west
corner of building façade on 4/18/96.
ARB04-340: Sign plans for Berk’s was approved on
3/7/05.
The proposal is for new business
identification signage that has been designed to comply with the development
standards and regulations of the Sign Code.
DESIGN
REVIEW
|
SIGN AREA FACTORS (PURSUANT TO SMMC
9.52) |
|
|
|
No. |
|
Existing Sign
Program |
Not required for single tenant sites. |
|
Permitted
Sign Area |
210 SF |
|
Existing
Sign Area |
153.45 SF |
|
Proposed
Sign Area (this application) |
129.75 SF |
|
Total
Sign Area Upon
Completion |
129.75 SF |
|
Total
Number of
New Signs |
8 (Two painted awning signs plus six
vinyl letter window signs) |
|
Compliance |
Yes |
Sign A and B “BERK’S”
Proposed Sign Type: Awning
Sign, Non-Illuminated
Proposed Dimensions (Area): 5.75
H x 11.25 W = (64.68 SF x 2) = (129.4SF)
Proposed Colors: White
letters on blue canvas and Yellow underline
Sign C, D, E, F, G “Outdoor Furniture”
Proposed Sign Type: Window
Sign, Vinyl letter
Proposed Dimensions (Area): 5.75
H x 11.25 W = (64.68 SF x 2) = (129.4SF)
Proposed Colors: White
letters on blue canvas and Yellow underline
STAFF
ANALYSIS
The subject site is located on the
southwest corner of
With this application, the applicant is
proposing a modest façade remodel involving the addition of eight new plain
blue canvas awnings, two awnings with signage reading, “Berk’s Luxuary Outdoor
Furnishings” consisting of white letters on blue canvas with a yellow underline,
and new overall building color with a trim accent. The two awnings with signage are
differentiated from the plain awnings in their design and their location over
the entrance. These two awnings are more
traditional in design in that the upper portions rest against the building
façade while the lower portions extend over the sidewalk. The eight plain
awnings are affixed in an inverted manner such that the lower portions rest
against the building façade while the upper portions extend away from the
building façade forming a “V” shape. The
plain awnings are further differentiated from the entrance awnings in that the plain
awnings expose the ½” square metal awning frame in front of the awning canvas
material, making the framework visible to passer’s by. The awnings with signage are articulated more
traditionally with the metal framing occurring behind the awning canvas
material. Six window signs are also
proposed with this application which all read, “Outdoor Furniture” and are
spaced evenly across each street facing window.
Staff supports the proposed remodel
involving new overall building color in that, it is a more comprehensive approach
that significantly upgrades the building’s street-facing facades and enhances the
building’s pedestrian orientation. The
replacement of the existing oversized wall signs with the more appropriately
scaled signage painted on new awnings will provide a cleaner, modernized look to
the building as a whole. Additionally, the
proposed location of the signage is more strategically oriented toward
pedestrian and vehicular traffic, occurring at the corner of
Collectively, the various aspects of
the proposed remodel will significantly improve the vehicular/pedestrian
orientation, provide a more modernized look to the building, and better anchor
the building as a distinct corner within the City.
RECOMMENDATION
Planning staff recommends that the
Architectural Review Board approve ARB application 06-111 subject to the findings
and conditions below:
FINDINGS:
A.
The plan for the proposed building or structure is
expressive of good taste, good design, and in general contributes to the image
of Santa Monica as a place of beauty, creativity and individuality in that the building
color, awnings, and signage significantly upgrade the building’s street-facing
facades.
B.
The proposed building or structure is not of inferior
quality such as to cause the nature of the local neighborhood or environment to
materially depreciate in appearance and value in that high quality material as
detailed in the application submittal and as presented to the Architectural
Review Board will be used.
C.
The proposed design of the building or structure is
compatible with developments on land in the general area in that building
color, awnings, and signage enhance the building’s pedestrian orientation.
D.
The proposed
development conforms to the effective guidelines and standards adopted pursuant
to Chapter 9.32 – Architectural Review Board, and all other applicable
ordinances insofar as the location and appearance of the buildings and
structures are involved. Specifically, the location and appearance of the
buildings and structures comply with required findings set forth in Chapter
9.32, as documented by the Architectural Review Board, and as
conditioned, the plans will fully comply with all applicable regulations prior
to the issuance of a building permit.
CONDITION(S):
1.
This approval shall expire in six months from the date of
approval or six months from the date a certificate of occupancy is granted for
construction-related projects. All conditions of approval and the final
inspection process must be completed within this timeframe. The applicant shall
submit a color photograph of all installed signs demonstrating compliance with
the Architectural Review Board approval to the staff liaison, prior to Planning
final.
2.
The Architectural
Review Board’s approval, conditions of approval, or denial of this application
may be appealed to the Planning Commission if the appeal is filed with the
Zoning Administrator within ten consecutive days following the date of the
Architectural Review Board’s determination in the manner provided in Chapter
9.32, Section 9.32.160.
Attachments:
Applicant’s Submittal Material