Planning Commission Meeting: December
12, 2007
Agenda Item: 8-A
To: Planning Commission
From:
Subject: Tract Map 07-021: Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 66574
Address:
Applicant: Grand Melin
Group
Recommended Action
This report recommends that the Planning Commission take the following
actions, subject to the finds and conditions contained in Attachment B:
1.
Approve
application 07TM-021;
2.
Approve
Statement of Official Action.
Executive Summary
The applicant requests approval of an airspace subdivision at the
subject property for the purpose of constructing a new three-unit residential
condominium project. Pursuant to Santa Monica Municipal Code Section
9.20.02.090, the Planning Commission is the responsible authority to approve,
conditionally approve, or deny tentative subdivision map applications.
Project / Site Information
The following table provides a
brief summary of the project location:
|
Zoning
District: |
R2
(Multiple Family) |
|
|
Land
Use |
Low
Density Housing |
|
|
Parcel
Area (SF): |
6,499
SF |
|
|
Parcel
Dimensions: |
50’W
x 130’D |
|
|
Existing
On-Site Improvements (Year Built): |
Single
family residence built 1928; to be demolished. |
|
|
Rent
Control Status: |
There
were two rent controlled units on-site removed from rent control via Ellis
effective 8/9/07. |
|
|
Adjacent
Zoning Districts and Land Uses: |
Multi-family
uses in the R2 Low Density Multiple Residential District. |
Subdivision Information
|
Parcel
Tract Map Number: |
66574 |
|
Subdivider/Applicant: |
Grand
Melin Group |
|
Number
of Units: |
Three
|
|
City
Engineer Preliminary Approval Date: |
October 8, 2007 |
|
Required
Off-Site Improvements: |
See
conditions of approval. |
|
Covenants,
Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs): |
The
CC&Rs will be reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney
consistent with SMMC 9.20.02.060 and prior to approval of the final map. |
|
Fees: |
Parks
and Recreation Facilities Tax ($200 / unit). Total tax = $600. Condominium
Facilities Tax ($1,000 / unit). Total tax = $3,000. |
Environmental Analysis
The
project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant
to Class 3, Section 15303 (b) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Projects located in
an urbanized environment designed for not more than six dwelling units are,
consistent with the Guidelines, exempt from environmental review.
Moreover, the project, including the property and any existing
improvements have been reviewed, and for the purposes of CEQA, determined not
to be a significant historic resource. Notwithstanding this CEQA determination,
because the existing
structure proposed for demolition is over 40 years old, a permit to demolish the existing improvements will
not be issued until the Landmarks Commission reviews the demolition permit
application and all requirements of SMMC Section 9.04.10.16.010 (d) are
met. The City’s Landmarks Commission
retains jurisdiction to review the demolition permit application and to nominate
the improvement as a City Landmark or Structure of Merit pursuant to the
designation criteria and procedures contained in Chapter 9.36 of the Santa
Monica Municipal Code. At the time this
report was prepared, the Landmarks Commission had not reviewed the demolition
permit for this property.
Project Analysis
The proposed three (3) unit condominium project is subject
to the regulations and standards as set forth in Article 9 of the Municipal
Code. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the proposed three-unit
condominium project for compliance with the Multiple Family Residential
District (R2) district development standards, and finds that the applicant’s
proposal appears to generally conform to the applicable zoning and design
standards. However, this review is only
intended to identify aspects of the plans that could result in significant
changes to the project’s design. A
complete code-compliance review will occur when the application is submitted
for plan check. It is the applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that the plans comply fully with all applicable
provisions of the Municipal Code. The
project is subject to review by the Architectural Review Board.
The proposed subdivision is consistent with the City’s
General Plan in that a three (3) unit condominium subdivision is proposed in an
area where Low Density Residential uses are encouraged, and the proposed
density of development is below the limitations established for this land use
district. The proposed design of the units will also meet the intent of the General
Plan by not exceeding two (2) stories or 30 feet in height. In addition, the
proposal will conform to the density limitations of the R2 district development
standards, where a maximum of five (5) dwelling units
could be permitted on-site with a density bonus. The subject
property is relatively flat and is does not contain any fish or extensive
wildlife habitat. It is located within a neighborhood where the necessary
public infrastructure and improvements are currently in-place, and developments
of similar use, density and design are present.
Pedestrian access to the site is provided from
Alternative Actions:
In
addition to the recommended action, the Planning Commission could consider the
following with respect to the project:
A1.
Continue the project for specific reasons, consistent with
applicable deadlines and with agreement from the applicant
A2.
Articulate revised findings and/or conditions to Approve OR Deny
the subject application, with / without prejudice
Prepared by:
Attachments
A.
Process
Review Times & Deadlines
B.
Draft
Statement of Official Action
C.
Public
Notification & Comment Material
D.
Subdivision
Map
ATTACHMENT A
PROCESS REVIEW TIME AND
DEADLINES
|
Application Determined Complete for Filing |
October
18, 2007 |
|
CEQA Deadline |
January
16, 2008 without extension. |
|
PSA Deadline |
January
16, 2008 without extension. |
|
Subdivision Deadline |
January
6, 2008 without extension. |
|
Total Process Review Time (Days) |
55
Days |
ATTACHMENT B
DRAFT STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL
ACTION
|
|
PROJECT INFORMATION CASE NUMBER: Tract Map 07TM-021
LOCATION: APPLICANT: Grand Melin Group Property
Owner: Ini
Kamoze CASE PLANNER: REQUEST: Approval of a
vesting tentative parcel map for the purpose of constructing three (3) new
residential condominium units pursuant to Santa Monica Municipal Code Section
9.20.04.030. CEQA STATUS: The project is categorically exempt from the
provisions of CEQA, pursuant to Class 3, Section 15303 (b) of the State CEQA
Guidelines. Projects located in an urbanized environment designed for not
more than six dwelling units are, consistent with the Guidelines, exempt from
environmental review. |
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
|
December 12, 2007 |
Determination Date |
|
December 12, 2007 |
Approved based on the following findings and subject to the conditions
below. |
|
|
Denied. |
|
|
Other: |
|
EFFECTIVE
DATES OF ACTIONS IF NOT APPEALED: |
December
23, 2007 |
|
EXPIRATION
DATE OF ANY PERMITS GRANTED: |
December
23, 2009 |
|
LENGTH OF ANY
POSSIBLE EXTENSION OF EXPIRATION DATES*: |
Maximum
three (3) years with Planning Commission approval |
* Any request for an
extension of the expiration date must be received in the City Planning Division
prior to expiration of this permit.
Each and all of the
findings and determinations are based on the competent and substantial
evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the
Project. All summaries of information
contained herein or in the findings are based on the substantial evidence in
the record. The absence of any
particular fact from any such summary is not an indication that a particular
finding is not based in part on that fact.
FINDINGS:
1.
The
proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans as
specified in Government Code Section 65451. Specifically, while the subject
property is not located in an area governed by a specific plan as specified in
Government Code Section 65451, compliance with the
City’s General Plan is required. For the purpose of subdividing the subject
parcel, there are two pertinent policies that must be evaluated with the map;
those policies relate to building height and unit density. As noted and shown
on the subject map, the project complies with applicable policies, including
unit density and height standards for the subject land use designation.
2.
The
design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable
general and specific plans. Specifically, while the subject property is not
located in an area governed by a specific plan, compliance with the City’s
General Plan is required. As noted and shown on the subject map, the proposed
improvements will not exceed land use designation limits to building height and
unit density.
3.
The
site is physically suitable for the type of development. Specifically, the subject parcel is a standard-sized parcel
located within an urbanized area adequately served by existing roadways and
infrastructure. The property is physically able to accommodate the proposed
development.
4.
The
site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.
Specifically, the subject parcel is a standard-sized parcel located within an
urbanized area adequately served by existing roadways and infrastructure.
Moreover the type of development and unit density is consistent with policies
set forth in the City’s General Plan and other improvements in the general
vicinity.
5.
The
design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or
wildlife or their habitat, in that the proposed subdivision is located in an
urbanized area that does not contain habitats or would otherwise injure fish
and wildlife.
6.
The
design of the subdivision or the type of improvement is not likely to cause
serious public health problems. The proposed subdivision is for a property
located in an urbanized area and is consistent with other similar improvements
in the area. As noted and shown on the map, the project complies with height
and unit density limitations set forth in the General Plan. The subdivision of
the parcel does not have the potential to disrupt the urban environment or
otherwise cause serious public health problems.
7.
The
design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of,
property within the proposed subdivision in that there are no public easements
located within the proposed subdivision.
8.
The
proposed subdivision is consistent with any ordinance or law of the City of
CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL:
Administrative
1.
The
tentative map shall expire 24 months after approval, except as provided in the
provisions of California Government Code Section 66452.6 and Subchapter 9.20.18
of the
2.
An appeal of the approval conditions of
approval, or denial of a subdivision map must be filed with the City Clerk
within ten consecutive days following the date of Planning Commission
determination in the manner provided in Part 9.20.14, Section 9.20.14.070. Any
appeal must be made in the form required by the Zoning Administrator.
3.
Pursuant to SMMC Section 9.04.10.02.450(d), if
the Building Official determines that another building permit has been issued less than fifteen months
prior to the date on which the building permit for this project has received
all plan check approvals and none of the relevant exceptions specified in
9.04.10.02.450(c) and (e) apply, the Building Official shall place the project
on a waiting list in order of the date and time of day that the permit application
received all plan check approvals, and the term of this approval and other City
approvals or permits necessary to commence the project shall be automatically
extended by the amount of time that a project remains on the waiting list. However, the permit shall also expire if the
building permit expires, if final inspection is not completed or a Certificate
of Occupancy is not issued within the time periods specified in SMMC Section
8.08.060. Applicant is on notice that
time extensions shall not be granted if development standards or the
development process relevant to the project have changed since project
approval. Extension requests to a subdivision map must be approved by the
Planning Commission.
4.
In the event permittee violates or fails to comply
with any conditions of approval of this permit, no further permits, licenses,
approvals or certificates of occupancy shall be issued until such violation has
been fully remedied.
Conformance with Approved Plans
5.
Project
plans for the condominium development shall be subject to a complete Code
Compliance review when the condominium plans are submitted for plan check and
shall comply with all applicable provisions of Article IX of the Municipal Code
and all other pertinent ordinances and General Plan policies of the City of
Affordable Housing Obligation
6.
Pursuant to Santa Monica Municipal Code (SMMC)
Chapter 9.56, the project is subject to the City's Affordable Housing
Production Program which requires a 3-unit development to pay an Affordable
Housing Production fee. The City’s Affordable Housing Production fee is
calculated based on the project’s floor area as defined by SMMC Section
9.04.02.030.315. The fee will be
calculated prior to payment based on the requirements of the Affordable Housing
Production Program, Section 9.56.070 and shall be based on the affordable
housing unit base fee in effect at the time the affordable housing fee is paid
to the City. The fee must be paid in
full prior to the City granting any approval for the occupancy of the project,
but no earlier than at the time of building permit issuance.
Fees
7.
A Park and Recreation Facilities Tax of $200.00
per residential unit shall be due and payable at the time of issuance of a
building permit for the construction or placement of the residential unit(s) on
the subject lot, per and subject to the provisions of Section 6.80.010 et seq.
of the Santa Monica Municipal Code.
8.
Prior
to issuance of a condominium license, the developer shall provide for the
payment of a Condominium Tax of $1,000 per planned salable unit pursuant to
Chapter 6.76 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code.
9.
No
building permit shall be issued for the project until the developer complies
with the requirements of Chapter 9.72 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code, the
Child Care Linkage Program.
If the developer elects to comply with these
requirements by providing facilities in lieu of fees, no building permits shall
be issued for the project until the Director of Planning and Community
Development has issued a notice that the developer has complied with the
requirements of this Chapter.
Cultural Resources
10.
No demolition of buildings or structure built 40
years of age or older shall be permitted until the end of a 60-day review
period by the Landmarks Commission to determine whether an application for
landmark designation shall be filed. If
an application for landmark designation is filed, no demolition shall be
approved until a final determination is made by the Landmarks Commission on the
application.
Rent Control
11.
Pursuant
to SMMC Section 4.24.030, prior to receipt of the final permit necessary to
demolish, convert, or otherwise remove a controlled rental unit(s) from the
housing market, the owner of the property shall first secure a removal permit
under Section 1803(t), an exemption determination, an approval of a vested
rights claim from the Rent Control Board, or have withdrawn the controlled
rental unit(s) pursuant to the provisions of the Ellis Act.
CC&Rs
12.
Prior
to issuance of building permits, Condominium Association By-Laws (if
applicable) and a Declaration of CC & R's shall be reviewed and approved by
the City Attorney. The CC&R's shall
contain a non-discrimination clause as presented in SMMC Section 9.20.20.020
and such provisions as are required by SMMC Section 9.04.16.01.030(e).
Standard Conditions
13.
Final
parking lot layout and specifications shall be subject to the review and
approval of the Transportation Management Division.
14.
Prior
to issuance of a building permit, a copy of the recorded map shall be provided
to the City Planning Division.
15.
Prior
to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate
compliance with Subchapter 9.04.16 Condominiums, including the provisions of SMMC
Section 9.04.08.06 Multiple Family Residential District.
ENVIRONMENTAL PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT (EPWM)
Drainage
16.
Notwithstanding
any Subdivision Map notations to the contrary, in order to mitigate storm water
and surface runoff from the project site, an Urban Runoff Mitigation Plan may
be required by the Department of Environmental and Public Works Management
(EPWM) pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 7.10.
Prior to submittal of landscape plans for Architectural Review Board approval,
the applicant shall contact EPWM to determine applicable requirements, which
include the following:
·
Non-stormwater
runoff, sediment and construction waste from the construction site and parking
areas is prohibited from leaving the site;
·
An
sediments or materials which are tracked off-site must be removed the same day
they are tracked off-site;
·
Excavated
soil must be located on the site and soil piles should be covered and otherwise
protected so that sediments do not go into the street or adjoining properties;
·
Washing
of construction or other vehicles shall be allowed adjacent to a construction
site. No runoff from washing vehicles on
a construction site shall be allowed to leave the site;
·
Drainage
controls may be required depending on the extent of grading and topography of
the site; and
·
New
development is required to reduce projected runoff pollution by at least twenty
percent through incorporation of design elements or principles, such as
increasing permeable surfaces, diverting or catching runoff via swales, berms,
and the like; orientation of drain gutters towards permeable areas;
modification of grades; use of retention structures and other methods.
Off-site
17.
All off
site improvements required by the City Engineer shall be installed. Plans and specifications for off site improvements
shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and approved by the City
Engineer.
18.
A
subdivision improvement agreement for all off site improvements required by the
City Engineer shall be prepared and a performance bond posted through the City
Attorney's office.
Final Map Requirements
19.
In
submitting required materials to the Santa Monica Engineering Division for a
final map, applicant shall provide a copy of the approved Statement of Official
Action.
20.
The
form, contents, accompanying data, and filing of the final subdivision map
shall conform to the provisions of SMMC Sections 9.20.12.010 through
9.20.08.090 and the Subdivision Map Act.
The required Final Map filing fee shall be paid prior to scheduling of the
Final Map for City Council approval.
21.
One
mylar and one blue-line copy of the final map shall be provided to and recorded
with the Los Angeles County Recorder prior to issuance of any building permit
for a condominium project pursuant to Government Code Section 66499.30.
Applicant shall also provide the County with a copy of this Statement of
Official Action at the time the required copies of the map are submitted.
22.
Prior
to approval of the Final Map, the requirements of Santa Monica Municipal Code
Section 9.04.10.16.010 (d) shall have been met.
VOTE
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
NOTICE
If this is a final decision not subject to further appeal
under the City of
I hereby
certify that this Statement of Official Action accurately reflects the final
determination of the Planning Commission of the City of
_____________________________ _____________________________
Gwynne Pugh, Chairperson Date
Acknowledgement by Permit Holder
I
hereby agree to the above conditions of approval and acknowledge that failure to
comply with such conditions shall constitute grounds for potential revocation
of the permit approval.
|
Print Name and Title |
|
|
Applicant’s Signature |
|
ATTACHMENT C
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
INFORMATION
Consistent with SMMC 9.20.14.010, notice of the subject application was
published in a newspaper of general circulation (Santa Monica Daily Press) and mailed to owners and occupants within
300 feet of the property, at least ten days prior to the hearing. In addition,
a copy of the notice was posted on the City’s website, on the City’s bulletin
board, and copies of the agenda mailed to all City-recognized neighborhood
groups prior to the hearing.
On November 13,
2007, the applicant was notified in
writing of the subject hearing date.
|
The applicant provided the
following information regarding attempts to contact area property owners,
residents, and recognized neighborhood associations: |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjacent Neighbors |
No contact information provided. |
|
Community Meetings |
No contact information provided. |
|
Other: |
|
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE
SUBJECT: Application 07TM-021 (No. 66574)
APPLICANT: Grand
Melin Grooup
PROPERTY OWNER: Ini
Kamoze
A public hearing will be held by the Planning
Commission to consider the following request:
The applicant requests approval of Tentative Parcel
Map No. 66574 pursuant to Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 9.20.04.030 for a
three unit airspace subdivision in conjunction with the construction of three
(3) new residential condominium units.
DATE/TIME: WEDNESDAY, December 12, 2007 AT 7:00 PM
LOCATION: City
Council Chambers, Second Floor,
HOW TO COMMENT
The City of
Address your letters to:
Re:
07TM-021
City
Planning Division
MORE INFORMATION
If you want more information about this project or
wish to review the project file, please contact Travis
Page, Assistant Planner at (310) 458-8341, or by e-mail at travis.page@smgov.net.
The Zoning Ordinance is available at the Planning Counter during business hours
and on the City’s web site at www.santa-monica.org.
The meeting facility is wheelchair accessible. For
disability-related accommodations, please contact (310) 458-8341 or (310)
458-8696 TTY at least 72 hours in advance. All written materials are available
in alternate format upon request. Santa Monica Big Blue Bus Lines numbered 1,
2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, and 10 serve City Hall.
Pursuant to California Government Code Section
65009(b), if this matter is subsequently challenged in Court, the challenge may
be limited to only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of
ESPAÑOL
Esto es una noticia de una audiencia pública para
revisar applicaciónes proponiendo desarrollo en
ATTACHMENT D
SUBDIVSION MAP