Planning Commission Meeting: December 12, 2007

Agenda Item: 10-C

To:                   Planning Commission

From:              Amanda Schachter, City Planning Division Manager

Subject:          Proposed Zoning Text Amendments to amend City of Santa Monica Municipal Code (SMMC) Section 9.04.02.030.305 [Definition of Fence Height], Section 9.04.02.030.395 [Definition of Hedge], and Section 9.04.10.02.080 [Fence, Wall, Hedge, Flagpole] to modify fence, wall, and hedge standards; to define front yard area; to grandparent existing nonconforming fences, walls, and hedges; to establish criteria for the repair and replacement of existing nonconforming fences, walls, hedges; to establish administrative and discretionary height modification procedures; to clarify the criteria for assessing objections to nonconforming fences, walls, and hedges; to require the maintenance of hedges; and to specify a self-help remedy for overhanging hedges.

 

Recommended Action

It is recommended that the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the proposed text amendment to the City Council.

 

Executive Summary

In July 2005, the City Council adopted an interim ordinance modifying the existing fence, wall, and hedge standards.  This ordinance has been subsequently extended and modified.  The City Council directed staff to prepare a permanent ordinance implementing the interim standards into the Santa Monica Municipal Code for review and adoption in early 2008.

 

The existing interim standards will be incorporated in the Zoning Ordinance with no changes proposed to the height regulations and height modification and objection procedures.  The process used to register existing nonconforming fences, walls and hedges will be preserved, maintaining the grandparenting of all existing nonconforming fences, walls, and hedges that were registered with the City. 

 

The only changes proposed to the existing interim standards are as follows:

 

  • Clarify the existing regulations pertaining to pergolas and similar features in front yard areas; and
  • Propose criteria for the repair and replacement of existing nonconforming hedges, walls, and hedges.

 

The proposed ordinance language is contained in Attachment A.

 

Background

For the past several years the City has made an effort to reconcile issues concerning private property fences, walls, and hedges, and perceived impacts related to personal security, light, air, privacy, neighborhood character, and aesthetics.  Responding to public concern regarding the City’s fence, wall, and hedge regulations and enforcement policies, the City Council directed the preparation of an interim ordinance in 2005 in an effort to mitigate these concerns. 

 

The intent of the interim ordinance was to:

 

·        Establish clear and objective standards related to fences, walls, and hedges;

·        Increase flexibility to allow modifications from objective standards;

·        Allow ornamental features, such as pergolas, within the front yard setback area;

·        Retain nonconforming fences, walls, and hedges; and

·        Give residents living adjacent to a nonconforming fence, wall, or hedge the opportunity to assert quality of life impacts, thus necessitating the lowering in height of the nonconforming fence, wall, or hedge.

 

The ordinance has been subsequently extended and modified, most recently in August 2007, when the City Council adopted Ordinance Number 2236 (CCS) modifying the interim standards to accomplish the following:

 

·        Clarify the criteria for evaluating pending objection appeal applications;

·        Require property owners to register nonconforming fences, walls, and hedges in accordance with modified administrative procedures;

·        Require property owners to maintain their hedges; and

·        Provide adjoining property owners with the right to remove those portions of the hedge that encroach over the property line.  

 

The City Council directed the preparation of a permanent ordinance for review and adoption in advance of the comprehensive Zoning Ordinance update.  On November 7, 2007, the Planning Commission adopted a resolution of intention to bring forward this proposed text amendment.

 

The proposed modifications would amend four sections of the Zoning Code:

 

·        Section 9.04.02.030.305 [Definition of Fence Height]

·        Section 9.04.02.030.395 [Definition of Hedge]

·        Section 9.04.10.02.080 [Fence, Wall, Hedge, Flagpole]

 

Discussion

The Interim Ordinance was adopted to reconcile issues concerning fences, walls and hedges on private property and perceived impacts related to personal security, light, air, privacy, neighborhood character and aesthetics.  Many of the standards incorporated into the Interim Ordinance changes have worked well, including: the modification procedures, a new height methodology, and a provision for ornamental structures in front yards.  The following table compares the existing interim regulations to the Zoning Ordinance and identifies discrete modifications to further enhance the regulations:

 

FENCE, WALL, AND HEDGE ORDINANCE STANDARDS

Standards

 Existing Interim Regulations

Zoning Ordinance

 

Fence & Wall Regulations

Side & Rear Yard

8 feet

8 feet

Front Yard

42-inches

42-inches

 

 

 

Hedge Regulations

Side & Rear Yard

12 feet (unlimited adjacent to and within 10 feet of an alley)

8 feet

Front Yard

42-inches

42-inches

 

 

 

Modification Procedures

Administrative

Up to 4-foot increase to side and rear yard heights with neighbor’s consent.

None

Discretionary

Modify front yard or increase beyond 4 feet in height at side and rear yard.

None

 

Nonconforming Fences, Walls and Hedges

Grandparenting

All nonconforming fences, walls and hedges constructed or planted prior to August 26, 2005 may remain

None

Registration Procedure

Self-registration of nonconforming fence, wall or hedge required

Cost: Free

None

Objection Procedure

Opportunity to object to neighbor’s nonconforming fence, wall or hedge

Cost: Free

None

Objection Appeals

Appeal of Objection determination

Cost: $222.35

None

Repair and Replacement of Nonconforming Fences, Walls, and Hedges

Limited removal of up to 50%, based on horizontal measurement, to be repaired or replaced with fence, wall, or hedge of existing nonconforming height (paraphrased)

None

 

 

 

Other Interim Standards

Ornamental Structures in front yard

Permitted subject to size limitations

None

Pergola Gates/Doors

Permitted within frame of pergola or similar structure

None

Height Methodology

Fence, wall or hedge measured from lowest adjacent grade

Fence, wall or hedge measured from existing grade

Hedge Definition

A boundary of shrubs, bushes or trees that enclose or divide an area (paraphrased)

A barrier of plant material functioning as an enclosure or used for screening

Front Yard Area

(42-inch height limit)

The area between the front property line and the nearest building wall or front setback line

None

Overhanging Hedges

Property owner required to maintain hedges and prevent overhang onto adjoining property

None

Flagpoles

Not to exceed height restrictions of district in which they are located

Not to exceed height restrictions of district in which they are located

 

It is recommended that the Interim Ordinance regulations presented above be incorporated into the Municipal Code.  Additionally, the following issues have been identified, and recommendations to address these concerns are suggested.

 

Pergolas and Similar Features in Front Yard Areas

The interim fence, wall, and hedge standards have allowed for one pergola or similar feature limited to eight feet in height and width and three feet in depth within the front yard area.  This has allowed a certain amount of flexibility for property owners in designing front yard fences, wall, and hedges.  However, the interim ordinance does not address any limitations to the height of a gate or door within the pergola. 

 

There is an opportunity to clarify the extent to which the interior of the pergola can be filled in with a solid gate or door, or whether such a gate or door should be limited in height within the frame of a pergola.  A full gate or door within the maximum allowable pergola structure can be an acceptable design feature of a front yard fence, wall, or hedge and can add an aesthetic feature to such a structure without creating a negative visual impact.  As long as a gate or door is maintained within the limited dimensions of such a pergola or similar feature, the design of an entrance feature within these dimensions should be allowed.   

 

Therefore, it is recommended that the following language be added:

 

            One pergola or similar feature limited to eight feet in height and width, and three feet in depth shall be permitted. Gates or doors within a pergola or similar feature shall be permitted within the frame of such structures.

 

Repair and Replacement of Existing Nonconforming Fences, Walls, and Hedges

The interim standards required all residential property owners to register their existing nonconforming fences, walls, and hedges in order to assert a legal right to any nonconforming fences, walls, and hedges at their heights as they existed in August 2005.  However, standards currently do not exist to address the extent to which these nonconforming fences, walls, or hedges may be repaired or replaced.  Such standards are required to balance the Council’s support to retain nonconforming fences, walls, and hedges and to prevent a property owner from building a completely new fence or wall or planting a new hedge to the same height as the previously existing nonconforming fence, wall, or hedge. The intent of the grandfathering provisions was to protect existing fences, walls, and hedges that have existed for some time and not to guarantee a particular height for the construction of planting of new fences, walls, or hedges. At some point in time, some of these nonconforming fences, walls, or hedges may require repair or replacement to a certain extent due to a variety of reasons including, but not limited to, damage or destruction, or in the case of hedges, age or disease.  Flexibility to allow for the repair or replacement of portions of such structures due to unanticipated or unforeseen circumstances should be provided. 

 

The proposed text amendment would allow the removal of no more than fifty percent of any nonconforming fence, wall, or hedge at any one time based on a horizontal linear measurement of the fence, wall, or hedge.  Similar to the current definition of “substantial remodel” and the existing standards for nonconforming buildings [SMMC Section 9.04.18.020(c)] within the Zoning Ordinance, the proposed regulations pertaining to the repair and replacement of nonconforming fences, walls, and hedges would seek to allow existing nonconforming situations to remain while requiring new construction and planting to conform over time.  However, it should be noted that for property owners wishing to replace more than fifty percent of a nonconforming fence, wall, or hedge, the new modification procedures will continue to provide an avenue to seek additional height for new fences, walls, or hedges.  A possible remedy for the replacement of fences, walls, or hedges that are completely damaged may also be considered. 

 

The alternative would be to not regulate the extent to which property owners can repair or replace existing over-height fences, walls, and hedges, and over time allow for the full replacement of such structures, essentially allowing the creation of new, nonconforming fences, walls, and hedges in perpetuity.      

 

Therefore, it is recommended that the following language be added:

 

            Nonconforming portions of fences, walls, and hedges may be repaired or replaced subject to the following limitations:

(1)       No more than fifty percent of the total horizontal linear dimension of a nonconforming fence, wall, or hedge shall be removed at any one time. 

(2)       Over any period of time, if more than fifty percent of the total horizontal linear dimension of a nonconforming fence, wall, or hedge is removed, the nonconforming portion beyond the fifty percent measurement shall not be replaced unless that portion of a fence, wall, or hedge conforms to the provisions of this Chapter.

(3)       If an entire nonconforming fence, wall, or hedge is removed, it shall not be replaced unless the fence, wall, or hedge conforms to the provisions of this Chapter.”

 

Text Box:  Height Measurement

The issue of how to measure the height of a fence, wall, or hedge has been the subject of some Council discussion.  In situations where a fence is located on a property line and the grades on either side of the fence or wall differ, questions arise as to the most appropriate method to measure their heights. If the height of a fence or hedge is measured from the exterior facing edge (A), a fence or wall at the allowable height limit may not provide adequate height on the interior of the property for safety reasons. If heights are measured from the interior of a property that is at a higher grade than the other side of a fence or wall (B), the height of the structure as viewed from the public right of way or adjacent property will appear higher than the stated height from the interior of the property.

 

In the Interim Ordinance, the heights of fences, walls, and hedges are measured from the lowest adjacent grade.  It is recommended that this continue to be the standard.  However, the Planning Commission is encouraged to discuss this matter further and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding height measurement methodology.  As with the replacement of nonconforming fences, walls, and hedges, property owners can apply for height modifications to get relief from the Code standards.

 

General Plan Consistency

In order to recommend the proposed text amendment to the City Council, the Planning Commission must find that the amendment is consistent with the City’s General Plan and that it promotes public health, safety, and general welfare. 

 

The proposed amendments are consistent in principle with the goals, objectives, policies, land uses and programs specified in the adopted General Plan, more specifically Land Use Element Objective 1.2 which is to “ensure compatibility of adjacent land uses, with particular concern for protecting residential neighborhoods”, Land Use Element Objective 3.3 which states that the City’s land use policies should seek to “enhance the pedestrian scale and character of streets and public spaces”, and Land Use Element Policy 3.4.7 which states that the City should seek “in multiple family residential areas…to reinforce the continuity of the residential streetscape…and to ensure safety of children”.

 

Environmental Analysis

The City’s actions to modify the fence, wall, hedge, and flagpole standards are legislative actions subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).  In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060-15061, staff conducted a preliminary review and determined that this project is exempt from CEQA on the following grounds:

 

The proposed ordinance is exempt pursuant to CEQA Section 15061(b)(3) in that it can be seen with certainty that the proposed ordinance does not have the potential to significantly impact the environment in that the amendments establish objective standards regulating the height of fences, walls, and hedges in the City’s residential districts while retaining legal nonconforming fences, walls, and hedges.  The proposed ordinance serves to further protect the environment by ensuring that fences, walls, and hedges do not impact neighbors’ access to air and light while still providing flexibility for property owners’ privacy and security concerns. 

 

 

Alternative Actions

In addition to the recommended action, the Planning Commission could consider the following with respect to the project:

 

A1.      Articulate revised findings and/or ordinance language to recommend adoption of the proposed text amendment to the City Council, or

A2.      Articulate revised findings to not recommend adoption of the proposed text amendment to the City Council.

 

Conclusion

The existing fence, wall, hedge, and flagpole standards within the Zoning Ordinance are general in detail and provide standards that have been subject to interpretation in the past. A series of interim ordinances in the past several years have attempted to clarify these standards and address issues concerning private property fences, walls, and hedges while balancing the needs of property owners and the concerns of neighbors.  The proposed Code amendments attempt to establish clear and objective standards while adding increased flexibility to allow certain modifications from these standards and allowing for the retention of legal nonconforming fences, walls, and hedges. The City Council directed staff to prepare a permanent ordinance implementing the interim standards into the Santa Monica Municipal Code for review and adoption in early 2008.   Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the text amendment to the City Council as specified in Attachment A.

 

 

Text Amendment Findings

1.         The proposed text amendment is consistent in principle with the goals, objectives, policies, land uses, and programs specified in the adopted General Plan, in that Land Use Element Objective 1.2 seeks to “ensure compatibility of adjacent land uses, with particular concern for protecting residential neighborhoods”. Land Use Element Objective 3.3 states that the City’s land use policies should seek to “enhance the pedestrian scale and character of streets and public spaces”, and Land Use Element Policy 3.4.7 states that the City should attempt “in multiple family residential areas…to reinforce the continuity of the residential streetscape…and to ensure safety of children”.  The proposed text amendment will establish clear and objective standards to ensure the compatibility of fences, walls, and hedges within residential neighborhoods.  

 

2.         The public health, safety, and general welfare require the adoption of the proposed amendment, in that the existing fence, wall, and hedge standards have resulted in issues and perceived impacts related to personal security, access to light and air, privacy, neighborhood character, and aesthetics.  The proposed ordinance will provide additional standards to mitigate these concerns and impacts to the public health, safety, and general welfare.

 

Prepared by:  Tony Kim, Associate Planner

 

Attachment(s):

 

A.                 Proposed Ordinance Language


 

ATTACHMENT A

 

 

Proposed Ordinance Language


AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE MODIFYING THE DEFINITIONS OF FENCE HEIGHT AND HEDGE *

 

 

9.04.02.030.305 Fence height.

 

The vertical distance between the ground and top of a fence measured from the existing lowest adjacent grade. The height shall be measured in a continuum at each point along the fence.

 

9.04.02.030.395 Hedge.

 

A boundary or barrier of plant material functioning as an enclosure or used for screening formed by a row or series of shrubs, bushes or trees that enclose, divide or protect an area or that prevent a person from passing between any combination of individual shrubs, bushes, or trees.

 

 

* The underlined text represents language that has been modified from the Zoning Ordinance. The italicized text represents language that has been modified from the existing Interim Ordinance.


AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE MODIFYING THE FENCE, WALL, HEDGE, FLAGPOLE STANDARDS *

 

 

9.04.10.02.080 Fence, wall, hedge, flagpole.

 

Subject to the hazardous visual obstruction requirements of Section 9.04.10.02.090, any fence, wall, hedge or flagpole shall comply with the following standards:

            (a)       Fences, walls, or hedges shall not exceed eight feet in height when located in a required side yard or rear yard. Maximum Heights in Front Yard Area. For the purpose of regulating the height of fences, walls, and hedges, the front yard area shall be considered to be the area between the front property line and the nearest building wall or front setback line, whichever is the shorter distance.

(1)       Hedges, fences and walls shall not exceed forty-two inches in height.

(2)       One pergola or similar feature limited to eight feet in height and width, and three feet in depth shall be permitted. Gates or doors within a pergola or similar feature shall be permitted within the frame of such structures.   

(3)       Ornamental attachments atop a fence, wall, or hedge shall be permitted up to twelve inches above the maximum height limit with a maximum width of twelve inches for each attachment and a minimum distance of five feet between each attachment.

(4)       A guardrail may exceed the maximum height limit for a fence or wall, but only to the minimum extent required for safety by the Building Code. Safety guardrails must be at least 50% visually transparent above the fence or wall height limit.

(5)       Each terraced fence, wall or hedge, or combination thereof, shall be set back a minimum distance from each other equal to the height of the nearest fence, wall or hedge.

            (b)(1)   Fences, walls or hedges shall not exceed forty-two inches in height when located in a required front yard.  Maximum Heights in Side and Rear Yards.

(2)(1)   A front yard chain link fence for a school may be up to eight feet in height.  A hedge shall not exceed twelve feet in height, except that there shall be no height limit for hedges adjacent to and located within 10 feet of an alley, measured perpendicularly from the side or rear property line that is adjacent to the alley.

(2)       Fences and walls shall not exceed eight feet in height.

(3)       A guardrail may exceed the maximum height limit for a fence, but only to the minimum extent required for safety by the Building Code. Safety guardrails must be at least 50% visually transparent above fence height limit.

            (c)        Fence, wall or hedge height shall be measured from the existing grade. In all cases, the fence, wall or hedge height shall be measured in a continuum at each point along the fence, wall or hedge.  Measuring Heights.  The height of a fence, wall, or hedge shall be measured from the lowest finished grade on either side of the fence, wall, or hedge.

            (d)       Freestanding flagpoles may not exceed the height restrictions of the district in which they are located.  Height Modifications – Administrative Process.  The owner of a fence, wall or hedge may request that the Zoning Administrator administratively grant a modification to the height limit of side and rear fences, walls and hedges provided the height modification does not extend more than four feet above the height limit established in subsection (b) of this Section.  The Zoning Administrator may grant this modification request if the following findings of fact are made:

(1)       The adjacent property owner(s) that share a common property line nearest to the fence, wall or hedge have agreed to the proposed increase in height.

(2)       The adjacent property owner(s) have provided verification of ownership in the adjacent property, have executed a notarized letter agreeing to the proposed height modification, and have agreed that notice of the modification determination can be recorded on their property with the Los Angeles County Recorder’s Office.

The Zoning Administrator modification determination is not appealable and shall be recorded with the Los Angeles County Recorder’s Office on each property.

            (e)          Height Modification – Discretionary Process.  If an adjacent affected owner does not agree to a proposed fence, wall, or hedge height modification in accordance with subsection (d) of this Section or if the owner of a fence, wall or hedge requests a height modification in excess of four feet in the side or rear yards or any modification to the height limits in the front yard area, the owner of the fence, wall or hedge may request that the Zoning Administrator grant a height modification to allow greater fence, wall, or hedge height in the front, side, or rear yard of the subject property based on the following findings:

(1)       The subject fence, wall, or hedge will be compatible with other similar structures in the neighborhood and is required to mitigate impacts from adjacent land uses, the subject property’s proximity to public rights-of-way, or safety concerns.

(2)       The granting of such modification will not be detrimental or injurious to the property or improvements in the general vicinity and district in which the property is located.

(3)       The modification will not impair the integrity and character of the neighborhood in which the fence, wall, or hedge is located.

This modification process shall be conducted in accordance with Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 9.04.20.10.040. However, the variance application findings set forth in Section 9.04.20.10.050 shall not be required.  The decision of the Zoning Administrator may be appealed to the Planning Commission within 14 consecutive calendar days of the date the decision is made in the manner provided in Part 9.04.20.24, Sections 9.04.20.24.010 through 9.04.20.24.050.

            (f)         Existing Nonconforming Fences, Walls, and Hedges.  All existing nonconforming hedges, fences and walls that were properly registered with the City by November 15, 2007 in accordance with the rules promulgated by the City Manager shall be grandparented at their height as of August 26, 2005 unless an objection was granted in accordance with the procedures established in Interim Ordinance Number 2236 (CCS).

            (g)       Repairs and Replacements of Nonconforming Fences, Walls, and Hedges.  Nonconforming portions of fences, walls, and hedges may be repaired or replaced subject to the following limitations:

(1)       No more than fifty percent of the total horizontal linear dimension of a nonconforming fence, wall, or hedge shall be removed at any one time. 

(2)       Over any period of time, if more than fifty percent of the total horizontal linear dimension of a nonconforming fence, wall, or hedge is removed, the nonconforming portion beyond the fifty percent measurement shall not be replaced unless that portion of a fence, wall, or hedge conforms to the provisions of this Chapter.

(3)       If an entire nonconforming fence, wall, or hedge is removed, it shall not be replaced unless the fence, wall, or hedge conforms to the provisions of this Chapter.  

            (h)        Flagpoles.  Freestanding flagpoles may not exceed the height restrictions of the district in which they are located.

            (i)         Overhanging Hedges.  The owner of a hedge shall maintain the hedge so that it does not overhang onto the property of an adjoining property owner.  If any portion of a hedge overhangs onto the property of an adjoining property owner, the adjoining property owner shall, after giving thirty days notice and opportunity to cure, have the right to remove those portions of the hedge that encroach on his/her property back to the property line so long as he/she acts reasonably and the removal does not cause unnecessary injury.  The adjoining property owner shall have the right to file a civil action to recover all costs reasonably incurred in removing the encroaching portions of the hedge.

            (j)         To the extent of any conflict between this Chapter and the hazardous visual obstruction requirements of Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 9.04.10.02.090, the hazardous visual obstruction requirements shall control.

 

 

* The underlined text represents language that has been modified from the Zoning Ordinance. The italicized text represents language that has been modified from the existing Interim Ordinance.