M I N U T E S

                REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
                       OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA

                              Founded 1875
                     "Populus felix in urbe felici"

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18, 1995                CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M.                                    ROOM 213, CITY HALL


1.   CALL TO ORDER:  The meeting was called to order at 7:09
     p.m.

2.   PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:  Commissioner Zinner led the Pledge
     of Allegiance.

3.   ROLL CALL:  Present:                                       Kenneth Breisch
                         Ralph Mechur
                         Eric Parlee
                         Thomas Pyne, Chair
                         Kathy Weremiuk
                         John Zinner

         Also Present:   Kyle Ferstead, Commission Secretary
                         Suzanne Frick, Director of
                         Planning/PCD
                         Amanda Schachter, Senior Planner
                         Mary Strobel, Deputy City Attorney
                         Kenyon Webster, Planning Manager

4.   APPROVAL OF MINUTES:

     Ms. Frick stated that the minutes for December 7, 1994,
     were previously approved on January 11, 1995.

     Commissioner Zinner made a motion to approve the minutes
     for December 14, 1994, as submitted.  Commissioner Breisch
     seconded the motion, which was approved by voice vote.

5.   PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT:

     Ms. Frick gave the Director's Report.  She stated that the
     Commission meeting scheduled February 1st has been
     rescheduled to February 8th due to a quorum problem.  She
     also reported that the City Council will be considering
     the Arboretum on January 24th.

     Chair Pyne asked Ms. Frick if the public hearing has been
     closed for the Arboretum.  Ms. Frick stated that requests
     to speak received on the prior hearing date will be
     honored, but new requests will not be taken.  Commissioner
     Mechur stated that the Planning Commission Chair might be
     allowed to speak.  Ms. Frick stated that is correct, and
     that the City Council may elect to reopen the public
     hearing.

6.   STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL ACTION: Consent Calendar

     Statements of Official Action were not submitted for
     approval.

7-A: PUBLIC HEARINGS:  Consent Calendar
Resolution of Intention, Permit Lifespan (Planner: Amanda
Schachter)
       Staff Report

Commissioner Parlee made a motion to approve item 7A, as
submitted.  Commissioner Breisch seconded the motion, which was
approved by voice vote.

8-A: PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Development Review 94-002, 3110 Main Street, CM District,
Applicant: Main Street Plaza, Application for a Development
Review Permit to amend DR 234 to allow commercial visitors,
customers, employees and tenants at 3110 Main Street to be
charged for parking. Currently, DR 234 requires that parking be
provided "at no direct cost" to "all project tenants,
customers, visitors and employees" at 3110 Main Street.
(Planner: D. Buckley)
       Staff Report

         The applicant's representative, Chris Harding, 1250
         6th Street, Suite 300, Santa Monica 90401, was present
         to discuss the application.

         Commissioner Zinner asked Mr. Harding to correct his
         letter regarding sale of bus tokens for the RTD, to
         the MTA.  He also asked if tokens for the Santa Monica
         bus line would be available.  Mr. Harding stated they
         are available and he will correct his records
         regarding the RTD.

         Commissioner Zinner asked if by "carpool", the
         applicant means two or more riders or three or more
         riders.  Mr. Harding stated "two or more riders".

         The following members of the public spoke:
         Sara Faulds, 2411-I 3rd Street, Santa Monica 90405
         Bonnie Reiss, 26665 Seagull Drive, Malibu
         Mike Feinstein, 142 Hollister Avenue, Santa Monica
         90405

         Mr. Harding spoke in rebuttal to the public comment.

         Commissioner Weremiuk asked how many spaces were in
         the parking area.  Mr. Harding stated that there are
         152 spaces.

         Commissioner Weremiuk asked how many of those 152
         spaces are used by employees.  Paul Silvern of
         Hamilton, Rabinovitz and Alschuler, responded that he
         prepared the parking analysis for the application, and
         stated that he did not have an exact number, however
         approximately 26% of the spaces are used by employees
         and tenants of the building during peak evening hours
         and 11% of the spaces by visitors to the facility.

         Commissioner Parlee commented on parking and potential
         impacts to the neighborhood.  Mr. Silvern stated that
         he did not obtain information regarding where
         employees park if they do not use the building's
         parking, however he felt there was no need for
         employees to park on the street.

         Commissioner Mechur commented on the parking spaces
         leased at St. Clement's Church.  Mr. Harding stated
         that there are thirty spaces leased at the church for
         the employees of Shatzi's restaurant.  He also
         stressed that the office use in this building is very
         low intensity and that the residential area near the
         site, in Santa Monica, has preferential parking at
         night.  Mr. Silvern stated that his survey of the
         area, which was done in the summer, revealed only 55%
         of the available spaces in use at any one time.  He
         also stated that the building's parking could absorb
         more intensive users.

         Chair Pyne closed the public hearing.

         Commissioner Zinner asked staff for the Commission's
         authority in changing the hours for preferential
         parking in the area.  Ms. Frick stated that the
         Commission has no discretion in this matter and such
         requests must be generated by residents.

         Commissioner Zinner expressed agreement with the
         applicant regarding free parking as not being a
         solution.  He stated that preferential parking for the
         neighborhoods would be a better solution.

         Commissioner Mechur also expressed agreement with the
         applicant and asked if a condition could be made to
         survey the residential parking.  Ms. Frick stated that
         such a survey is very labor intensive.  She
         recommended that the applicant work with staff on this
         matter if the residents request a change in hours for
         the preferential parking.

         Commissioner Parlee asked staff if it would be
         appropriate to ask the applicant to work with the
         neighbors regarding the expansion of preferential
         parking.  Ms. Frick stated that the Commission has
         done this in the past.

         Commissioner Zinner suggested tying such work to OPCO
         and asked the applicant to agree to fund any studies
         that might be needed for the expansion of preferential
         parking.  Ms. Frick stated that if the residents come
         forward with a request for an expansion, then the
         applicant could be contacted to aid the neighbors in
         their request.

         Commissioner Zinner made a motion for approval with
         the following conditions: that page five be amended to
         clarify carpools as two or more riders; that the
         language regarding bus tokens be amended and include a
         50% discount for all bus lines; and that language be
         created to require the applicant to aid residents in
         the preparation of documentation for any request to
         expand preferential parking hours.

         Commissioner Mechur seconded the motion.

         Commissioner Breisch asked about the inclusion of a
         condition regarding funding for a shuttle. 
         Commissioner Zinner stated he would accept the
         language used in the Lawrence and Harding letter. 
         Commissioner Mechur also agreed to the additional
         condition.

         Deputy City Attorney Strobel suggested clarifying the
         shuttle condition, as the letter indicates it would be
         contingent upon the creation of an assessment
         district. 

         Chair Pyne reopened the public hearing to allow Mr.
         Harding to speak.  Mr. Harding stated that the
         language regarding the shuttle may be broadened and
         not be contingent upon an assessment district.

         The motion was approved by the following vote:
         AYES:  Breisch, Mechur, Parlee, Pyne, Weremiuk,
         Zinner.

8-B: Conditional Use Permit 94-022, 1429 Third Street
Promenade, C3C, Applicant: Albert Mizrahi/Gotham Hall,
Application for a Conditional Use Permit to amend Conditional
Use Permit 92-014 to permit a 4,766 sq.ft. expansion of an
existing 9,365 sq.ft restaurant/bar with an approved Type-47
(On-Sale General for Public Eating Place) alcohol license on
the second floor and roof deck of 1429 Third Street Promenade. 
The proposal includes a request for a 190 sq.ft. dance floor, a
102 sq.ft. stage, and live music.  The proposal would add 237
seats to the existing 206 seats for a proposed total of 443
seats.  (Planner: Susan Healy Keene)
         Continued to February 1, 1995

         Commissioner Breisch made a motion to continue item 8B
         to February 8, 1995.  Commissioners Weremiuk and
         Parlee seconded the motion, which was approved by
         voice vote.