M I N U T E S
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA
Founded 1875
"Populus felix in urbe felici"
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 1995 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M. ROOM 213, CITY HALL
1. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 7:12
p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Zinner led the
Pledge of Allegiance.
3. ROLL CALL:
Present: Kenneth Breisch, Chairperson
Frank Gruber
Lou Moench
Eric Parlee
Kathy Weremiuk
John Zinner
Absent: Berton R. Bradley
Also Present: Kyle Ferstead, Commission Secretary
Suzanne Frick, Director of
Planning/PCD
Terry Graboski, ARB Member Liaison
Barry Rosenbaum, Deputy City Attorney
Mary Strobel, Deputy City Attorney
Kenyon Webster, Planning Manager
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Commissioners Parlee and Zinner asked for corrections to
the minutes for October 11, 1995.
Commissioner Zinner made a motion to approve the minutes
for October 11, 1995, as amended, and October 18, 1995,
October 25, 1995, November 1, 1995, and November 15, 1995,
as submitted.
Commissioner Parlee seconded the motion, which was
approved by voice vote.
5. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT:
Ms. Frick gave the Director's Report. She began by
announcing the cancellation of the December 13th meeting
of the Commission. Additionally, she reported that the
City Council will be reviewing the Bayside Specific Plan
on January 9, 1996, and authorizing the Urban Design Plan.
Also in January, the Commission will be reviewing the
Montana Avenue Master Plan, which will go to City Council
in either February or March.
Commissioner Weremiuk inquired about receiving a copy of
the Bayside staff report.
Commissioner Parlee asked when the Airport Committee would
be meeting. Ms. Frick stated that she will check, but
expected there will not be a meeting until January.
Commissioner Parlee asked about the Sunset Park Traffic
Plan. Ms. Frick stated that the Plan is tentatively set
for City Council on February 27, 1996.
6. STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL ACTION: Consent Calendar
Commissioner Parlee made a motion to approve items 6A, 6D,
6E, and 6F as submitted. Commissioner Moench seconded the
motion, which was approved by voice vote.
Commissioner Parlee made a motion to approve item 6B as
submitted. Commissioner Moench seconded the motion, which
was approved by voice vote with Commissioner Weremiuk
abstaining.
Commissioner Parlee made a motion to approve item 6C as
submitted. Commissioner Moench seconded the motion, which
was approved by voice vote with Commissioners Weremiuk and
Zinner abstaining.
6-A: CUP 95-019, 1311 3rd Street.
6-B: DR 95-005, VAR 95-031, 1128-44 5th Street.
6-C: TPC 322, 1138 15th Street.
6-D: TPC 323, 837 2nd Street.
6-E: VARIANCE APPEAL, VAR 95-005, 1619 Montana Avenue.
6-F: CUP 95-016, Variance 95-033, 2423 Wilshire Boulevard.
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Consent Calendar
7-A: Tenant-Participating Conversion Case, TPC-324, Vesting
Tentative Tract No. 52030, 1048 18th Street, R2, an
application for a Tenant-Participating Conversion and
Vesting Tentative Map to convert a 7-unit apartment
building into condominiums at 1048 18th Street.
Staff Report
The applicant's representatives, Rick Mills and Paul
DeSantis, were present to discuss the application.
One member of the public, James Grancich, 1048 18th
Street #6, Santa Monica, spoke in favor of the
conversion.
Mr. DeSantis spoke in rebuttal to the public comment.
Commissioner Weremiuk asked about approving a
conversion that does not have adequate parking for all
units. Mr. DeSantis stated that many conversions have
been approved in the past with insufficient parking.
Commissioner Parlee asked about the problem with Home
Owners Associations (HOA) and income from a rental
unit. Mr. DeSantis commented on the tax problems for
a non-profit HOA. Deputy City Attorney Strobel
commented that this subject was raised at the joint
meeting with the Rent Control Board as a "potential
issue", however nothing has been submitted in writing
to staff.
Commissioner Parlee asked if a written opinion could
be requested from the City Attorney's Office. Deputy
City Attorney Strobel sated she was not sure, however
she would investigate it. Ms. Frick stated that this
is considered a precedent position as bootleg units
are not considered legal units by Planning and Zoning
or Building and Safety, but are recognized by the Rent
Control Board. She asked if the Commission wants to
reward the property owner for creating a bootleg unit.
Commissioner Gruber asked for an explanation of the
background regarding bootleg units, TORCA and Rent
Control. Ms. Frick explained that there are three
regulatory bodies that deal with the bootleg units:
Rent Control, which acknowledges the units as legal
dwelling units; Planning and Zoning, which deems the
units illegal because they were not built with
permits; and Building and Safety, which looks to see
that minimum habitability standards are met.
Commissioner Gruber asked about a comment on page two
of the staff report implying discretion by the
Commission. Ms. Frick stated that the Commission does
have discretion in this matter and the policy
presented in the staff report is for the Commission's
consideration. She also stated that approving this
bootleg unit would set a precedent.
Commissioner Weremiuk stated that she recalls two
other bootleg units that have been approved by the
Commission. She commented that in general she
believes all bootleg units should be shut down,
however in this case the unit is a very decent space
and could be sold. She also commented that another
determining factor is that the current tenant wants to
purchase the unit and has upgraded the unit.
For the record, staff stated that previously approved
bootleg TORCA units have been split units. Ms. Frick
stated that in the prior instances there has been a
memorandum from Rent Control regarding the specific
bootleg units.
Commissioner Moench made a motion to recommend the
staff report be upheld except that the bootleg unit
shall be made for sale.
Commissioner Weremiuk seconded the motion.
Commissioner Zinner stated that the Commission needs
to make findings as to why the Commission is making
this change.
Chair Breisch expressed discomfort with the motion
because of the past policy made with the Rent Control
Board. He also expressed reluctance to approve a
conversion when the building has been vacant for seven
months and the original tenants that applied for TORCA
are no long associated with the building.
Commissioner Zinner commented that the Rent Control
Board policy and talks did not take into account a
damaging earthquake and forced tenant vacancies. He
stated for the record that all prior tenants stated in
writing that they were not interested in purchasing
the units following the repair of the building.
Commissioner Gruber commented that he is sympathetic
to the conversion issue with the Rent Control Board
and suggested referring this item to the Board for
their comment. Ms. Frick stated that this is not
governed by an ordinance, but is a policy document
between two boards and that the policy agreed to may
be changed.
Commissioner Gruber expressed support for amending the
motion and continuing this discussion pending a
comment from the Rent Control Board. Ms. Frick stated
that the Subdivision Map deadline for approving this
conversion is December 18, 1995.
Commissioner Parlee expressed support for the motion.
He stated that he was on the Commission when the
discussions were held with the Rent Control Board and
expressed the opinion that in this case there is no
reason not to convert the unit for sale.
Commissioner Moench stated that, as the maker of the
motion, he would like to hear from the Rent Control
Board. Ms. Frick stated that this cannot be done
unless the applicant is willing to waive the deadline
date.
Commissioner Moench made a motion to open the public
hearing. Mr. DeSantis asked for time to confer with
his clients.
Commissioner Gruber asked about Condition #23. Staff
stated that this is a standard bootleg condition as
regards parking spaces.
Mr. DeSantis expressed a preference for resolving the
matter this evening and directed the Commission's
attention to page five, attachment J, which regards
habitability.
Commissioner Zinner expressed support for converting
the bootleg unit, but also wanted the Rent Control
Board opinion.
Commissioner Moench withdrew his motion.
Commissioner Parlee reinstated the motion to approve
the conversion including the bootleg unit.
Commissioner Gruber seconded the motion.
Commissioner Parlee stated that the Rent Control Board
should be apprised of the situation and can render an
opinion during the appeal period.
Commissioner Moench commented that it is the Rent
Control Board's mandate to keep the unit forever
habitable and rented.
Commissioner Gruber asked if the motion is to go with
the staff report, and Unit #6 cannot be sold, can
anyone cause the matter to return for an amendment to
allow the sale of Unit #6 in the future. Deputy City
Attorney Strobel stated that a new map would need to
be filed for the additional unit.
Ms. Frick stated that the applicant has agreed to
continue the matter to January 24, 1996.
Commissioner Weremiuk made a substitute motion to
continue this matter to January 24, 1996, and that the
matter be sent to the Rent Control Board for review
and an opinion.
Ms. Frick stated that, due to time constraints, the
matter may be given to the Rent Control Board staff
for an appropriate response.
Commissioner Gruber seconded the motion.
The motion was approved by the following vote:
AYES: Breisch, Gruber, Moench, Parlee, Weremiuk,
Zinner;
ABSENT: Bradley.
CONTINUED TO JANUARY 24, 1996.
7-B: Conditional Use Permit 95-018, TPM 24314, 843 15th Street,
Applicant: R. Nikkhesall, Architect, Application for a
Conditional Use Permit and a Tentative Parcel Map to
permit the construction of a two story, three-unit
condominium over a six space subterranean parking garage
accessed from the rear alley. (Planner: Gina Szilak)
Staff Report
Commissioner Parlee made a motion for approval of CUP
95-018 as submitted. Commissioner Weremiuk seconded
the motion, which was approved by voice vote with
Commissioner Zinner abstaining.
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
8-A: EQPC 95-002, TM 95-006 (VTPM 24337), 1351 Palisades Beach
Road, R2B, Applicant: Westec Construction, Inc.,
Application for a Vesting Tentative Parcel Map and an
Earthquake Recovery Permit to consider the replacement of
a demolished four story 17,845 square foot commercial
office building with a four story 14,483 square foot
building with three (3) residential condominium units at
1351 Palisades Beach Road. (Planner: Steven Ross)
Staff Report
Chair Breisch welcomed Architectural Review
Boardmember Terry Graboski, who will be reviewing this
item with the Commission.
The applicant's architect, John Reed, REA Architects,
1501 Colorado Avenue, Santa Monica 90404, was present
to discuss the project.
Commissioners Weremiuk and Zinner commented that the
west wall was very bare and suggested that planting
pockets be added. Mr. Reed stated that this would be
possible.
Boardmember Graboski commented favorably on the
changes in design to the proposed project. He also
commented that the addition of the plant pockets on
the west elevation would be a good idea.
Commissioner Parlee asked if the Earthquake Recovery
Ordinance addresses the issue of landscaping. Mr.
Frick stated that it could be considered as part of
the compatibility findings and could be included as a
modification to the approval.
Commissioner Parlee expressed overall support for the
redesign.
Chair Breisch closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Weremiuk asked Commissioner Moench if he
was satisfied with the landscaping explanation for the
Palisades Beach Road elevation of the building.
Commissioner Moench stated that he was satisfied as
long as the pedestrian zones are landscaped.
Commissioner Weremiuk commented that the drawings do
not show the adjacent residences and stated a
preference for drawings that give more context to the
neighborhood.
Commissioner Moench made a motion for approval with
staff's findings and conditions and with a condition
that the landscaping be addressed on all sides of the
building.
Commissioner Parlee seconded the motion. He
recommended that the architect explore landscaping
pockets on the western elevation. Additionally, he
commented that it will be difficult to maintain
landscaping on the eastern elevation due to the
nearness of the highway. Commissioner Moench
commented that freeways have landscaping and that the
eastern elevation needs landscaping because it appears
too sterile.
Chair Breisch commented that the building could be
built to the sidewalk by right, but agreed that the
landscaping is too sparse. He also commented that he
finds the eastern elevation very interesting and he is
pleased with the overall building design.
Commissioner Moench commended the architect on the
overall design of the building.
Chair Breisch expressed agreement that the western
elevation needs some landscaping and commended the
architect on the building design.
The motion was approved by the following vote:
AYES: Breisch, Graboski, Gruber, Moench, Parlee,
Weremiuk, Zinner;
ABSENT: Bradley.
[The Commission took a break at this point.]
8-B: Conditional Use Permit 95-021, 1331 Wilshire Boulevard,
C6-Neighborhood Commercial Overlay, Applicant: Thrifty
Payless, Inc., Application for a Conditional Use Permit to
allow a Type-21 (Off-Sale General) alcohol license to be
used in conjunction with operation of Payless Drug Store
(formerly Thrifty Jr. Drug Store), a drug and variety
store located at 1331 Wilshire Boulevard in the C-N
(Boulevard Commercial - Neighborhood Commercial Overlay)
District. The store hours of operation are 7:00 a.m. to
10:00 p.m., with hours extended in holiday periods until
11:00 p.m.. Pursuant to the Zoning Ordinance the rights
to sell alcohol at this location under the applicant's
existing Type 20 (Off-Sale Beer and Wine) alcohol license
expired when the business remained closed for one year.
(Planner: L. Beck)
Staff Report
The applicant's representative, Art Rodriguez, 709
East Colorado Avenue, Suite 210, Pasadena 91101, was
present to discuss the project. Also present was Dave
Mahan, 125 East Baker Street, Suite 155, Costa Mesa
92626.
No members of the public submitted requests to speak.
Commissioner Gruber asked about the length of the
proposed alcohol shelf area. Mr. Rodriguez stated
that the area will be 140 linear feet.
Commissioner Gruber asked if cold beer will be sold.
Mr. Rodriguez stated that there will be cold beer for
sale, however single can sales will be prohibited.
Commissioner Gruber asked about the sale of hard
liquor. Mr. Rodriguez stated that only standard sizes
of hard liquor will be sold and no "hip flasks".
Commissioner Parlee asked for the percentage of gross
alcohol sales for the establishment. Mr. Rodriguez
stated that this store previously had approximately 2%
gross alcohol sales and other stores in the chain do
not exceed 3% gross alcohol sales.
Chair Breisch closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Zinner asked about the Police
Department's recommendation on this application.
Staff explained that the Police Department is opposed
to any increase in general alcohol sales, however they
find less objection to outlets that only sell beer and
wine.
Commissioner Gruber asked for an explanation as to why
different types of alcohol licenses are or are not
deemed an intensification of use. Ms. Frick explained
that this request expands the types of alcohol sold
and staff's position is a policy decision. Staff also
commented that the Police Department memorandum states
that there are already enough hard liquor outlets in
the area.
Commissioner Moench stated that he knows this
operation and does not feel there will be a problem
with allowing a Type 21 license. He stated that he
will support the application.
Commissioner Parlee expressed support for the
application. He asked if there is a condition for
limiting the gross percentage of alcohol sales.
Deputy City Attorney Strobel stated that the
Commission has made such a condition in the past,
however the City Attorney has also expressed concern
that such a condition may be pre-empted by State law,
and the applicant must agree to such a condition.
Commissioner Gruber made a motion for approval for a
Type 21 Alcohol License with the following conditions:
that the liquor shelf space not exceed 140 square
feet; that there be no refrigerated alcohol sales;
that there be no cup sales; that liquor sale size be
no less than 750 ml or a six-pack of beer; and that
the conditions of approval for the West Los Angeles
store be included.
Commissioner Parlee seconded the motion and asked that
"no fortified wines" be included as part of the
motion. There was a discussion as to what constitutes
a "fortified wine" and the applicant stated that the
only fortified wine that is carried by his
establishment is port wine, not Ripple or Thunderbird.
Commissioner Parlee asked if the condition could
include "no fortified wines or spirits with over 20%
alcohol content".
Commissioner Zinner expressed support for the motion.
Commissioner Moench commented on the need to
refrigerate some beers, especially those made by
micro-breweries and those which contain no
preservatives.
Chair Breisch expressed concern that going from a Type
20 to a Type 21 Alcohol License was an intensification
of use.
Commissioner Weremiuk stated that she will not support
the motion because it is an intensification of use and
the Police Department is against it.
Deputy City Attorney Strobel asked that, for the
record, the applicant state their conditions as part
of the application. The applicant stated that they
need to be able to sell six-packs of beer cold.
Commissioner Weremiuk asked if, prior to the
earthquake, six-packs were sold refrigerated. The
applicant answered in the affirmative. Commissioners
Gruber and Parlee agreed to delete the condition
regarding non-refrigeration.
The motion was approved by the following vote:
AYES: Gruber, Moench, Parlee, Zinner; NOES: Breisch,
Weremiuk;
ABSENT: Bradley.
8-C: Appeal of Zoning Administrator Denial of Use Permit 94-010, 119 Ocean Park Boulevard, R2R, Applicant and
Appellant: Christopher Harding/Kevin Kozal, Lawrence and
Harding, Appeal of Zoning Administrator Denial of Use
Permit 94-010 to allow an existing rooftop TVRO parabolic
antenna with no screening provided. In the R2R District,
antennas are required to be ground mounted unless a Use
Permit for a rooftop parabolic antenna is approved. The
existing rooftop antenna extends 8.5 feet above the
roofline which is below the maximum height permitted of 15
feet above the roofline. A Use Permit is also necessary
to permit a parabolic antenna without screening. The
existing antenna is 10 feet in diameter, which is less
than the 12 foot diameter maximum permitted. This antenna
has previously been reviewed as a Conditional Use Permit.
Per Ordinance 1757 (CCS), adopted July 26, 1994, certain
standards have been established for the number, location
and height of antennas permitted in each District. A Use
Permit is required when the applicant requests a
modification to those standards set forth in the
Ordinance. (Planner: Susan Healy Keene)
Staff Report
Following the staff report, the City's consultant,
Jonathan Kramer, gave a presentation.
Commissioner Weremiuk asked for the additional cost of
the two dish option. Mr. Kramer stated that he would
need to check that information.
Commissioner Parlee asked if, in the various study
scenarios, the potential build-out of adjacent
properties was considered. Mr. Kramer answered in the
affirmative.
Commissioner Parlee asked about the federal
government's definition of "reasonable reception". Mr.
Kramer stated that "reasonable reception" has not been
defined and referred the question to the City Attorney.
DCA Rosenbaum stated that the declaration received
this date raises build-out issues and acknowledges that
while the two dish option does overlap, adjacent
buildings also block part of the arc and full coverage
can not be guaranteed. Ms. Frick pointed out that this
information has just been received and staff has not
had time to fully analyze the new declaration and
issues raised.
Commissioner Gruber asked about the differences between
"satellite feed for local stations versus cable. Mr.
Kramer explained that cable has the same programs as
"air feed", but with "satellite feed" times may vary,
advertisements may be different, but the programs are
the same.
The appellant's representative, Christopher Harding of
the Law Offices of Lawrence and Harding, was present to
address the Commission. He respectfully requested
additional speaking time due to the complex nature of
the appeal.
Commissioner Moench made a motion to allow three
minutes each for the appellant's team.
Also addressing the Commission were Harry Shearer, 119
Ocean Park Boulevard, Santa Monica and Robert LaBriola,
the appellant's satellite dish expert consultant.
The following members of the public spoke:
Jay Charles, 117 Fraser Avenue, Santa Monica 90405
Liucija Baskauskas, 130 Fraser Avenue, Santa Monica
90405
Stephen Anaya, 130 Fraser Avenue, Santa Monica 90405
Lawrence S. Dietz, 840 Pine Street, Santa Monica 90405
Carolanne Sudderth, 143 Hollister Avenue #8, Santa
Monica 90405
Mr. Harding spoke in rebuttal to the public comment.
Chair Breisch closed the public hearing.
[The Commission took a break at this time.]
Commissioner Zinner asked for the basis of the Zoning
Administrator's decision. Mr. Webster explained that
he agrees with the technical experts that the hardship
was created by the addition to the dwelling which
rendered the prior satellite dish location inadequate.
He stated that the City's position is that the property
owner created the inadequate situation.
Commissioner Zinner asked the City Attorney to
elaborate. Deputy City Attorney Strobel stated that
the Zoning Ordinance allows for two circumstances for
which a Use Permit may be granted; first, in cases
where there is an obstruction and, second, where
compliance with design standards is cost prohibitive,
which was not previously argued by the applicant until
December 5, 1996. She stated that there is discretion
with the language and how it is applied, however there
has been no prior interpretation by the Commission.
Commissioner Weremiuk commented that this issue came to
the Commission before as a CUP and it was presented
much differently. She also commented that the addition
to the dwelling is very tasteful, fits the neighborhood
and was legally done. Lastly, she commented on the
costs associated with the addition and the changes in
zoning regulations since the CUP was applied for.
Commissioner Gruber commented on the 1992 renovation of
the property and the photographs submitted of the
satellite dish on the property. He stated that the
photographs do not show the true perspective and seeing
the dish in person appalled him and reminded him of a
1950 spaceship on the rooftop. He stated that if the
addition had been well planned, a modification could
have been made to accommodate the satellite dish.
Additionally, he commented on unreasonable reception
and various costs associated with the satellite dish.
Commissioner Zinner expressed agreement with
Commissioner Gruber. He stated that the renovation of
the dwelling did not account for the needs of the
satellite dish. He also stated that the new dwelling
design is nice, but the satellite dish has become an
ugly aesthetic part of the structure. He commented
that he does not agree with Commissioner Weremiuk and
that the renovation design could have accommodated the
needs of the satellite dish.
Commissioner Parlee expressed support for the comments
made by Commissioner Weremiuk because "beauty is in the
eye of the beholder". He commented on various factors
not under the control of the property owner and stated
that he is inclined to grant the Use Permit.
Commissioner Moench asked about a definition for
"reasonable reception". DCA Rosenbaum stated that the
FCC does not have such a definition and reviews these
matters case by case.
Commissioner Moench asked a series of questions
regarding build-out of adjacent properties and antenna
standards. Mr. Webster explained the code on these
issues.
Chair Breisch stated that the reason a Use Permit is
required is a recognition of many situations the City
sees as problems. He stated that such issues need to
be reviewed on a case by case basis while balancing the
freedom to receive signals versus community standards
for air, light and aesthetics.
Commissioner Moench made a motion to go past 11 p.m.
Commissioner Zinner seconded the motion, which was
approved by voice vote.
Commissioner Zinner made a motion to uphold the Zoning
Administrator's denial of the Use Permit.
Commissioner Moench seconded the motion.
Commissioner Gruber commented on the ambiance of the
neighborhood and stated that a satellite dish is not
aesthetic.
Commissioner Weremiuk stated that satellite dishes are
permitted with a Use Permit. She posed several
questions regarding cost, reasonable obstruction and
the right of reception.
Commissioner Parlee commented on the placement of the
satellite dish prior to the addition and the need for
fairness.
Commissioner Gruber commented that aesthetics are an
issue invoked by the FCC and that the City needs to
balance the process.
The motion suffered a technical denial by the following
vote:
AYES: Breisch, Gruber, Zinner; NOES: Moench, Parlee,
Weremiuk;
ABSENT: Bradley.
The Commission discussed whether the item should be
continued and reconsidered with a full Commission or
left as technical denial.
Commissioner Weremiuk made a motion to reconsider.
Commissioner Moench seconded the motion.
Chair Breisch asked staff about the "build-out" issue
raised this evening. Ms. Frick stated that this could
be addressed if new information is introduced and
public hearing reopened.
Commissioner Gruber asked if the technical denial means
the item will proceed to the City Council on appeal.
DCA Strobel stated that the Planning Commission action
is final and is not appealable to the City Council.
The motion to reconsider failed by the following vote:
AYES: Moench, Parlee, Weremiuk; NOES: Breisch,
Gruber, Zinner;
ABSENT: Bradley.
8-D: Conditional Use Permit 95-020, 1446 Third Street
Promenade, C3C, Applicant: Gary Nolan/Chillers Restaurant,
Application for a Conditional Use Permit to amend the
following conditions of Conditional Use Permit 89-100:
Condition #2, to permit alcohol beverages to be served
from 11:00 am to 2:00 am daily, in lieu of the current
permitted hours of 11:00 am to 1:00 am daily; and
Condition #11, to permit service of alcoholic beverages in
the bar area until 2:00 am, in lieu of prohibiting
alcoholic beverage service in the bar area after midnight,
but permitting the sale of alcoholic beverages in the
dining area after midnight. The subject property is a 212
seat restaurant with an approved Type-47 (On-Sale General
for Public Eating Place) alcohol license. (Planner: Susan
Healy Keene)
Continued to February 7, 1996.
8-E: Conditional Use Permit 95-022 , Variance 95-029, 1810
Ocean Avenue, RVC, Applicant: Bruce Marder, Application
for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the issuance of a
Type-47 Alcohol License (On-Sale General Alcohol License
for a Bona Fide Public Eating Place) to be used in
conjunction with a new 1,826 square foot restaurant with a
total of 78 seats and a Variance to provide 12 parking
spaces in lieu of the 13 parking spaces required by code
for this new restaurant on-site with valet parking
service. (Planner: Susan Healy Keene)
Continued to January 10, 1996.
9. OLD BUSINESS: NONE.
10. NEW BUSINESS: NONE.
11. COMMUNICATIONS:
A. Planning Commission Caselist
B. Zoning Administrator Caselist
C. Cumulative Projects List
D. Appeal of Planning Commission Decision to City Council
1. None
12. COMMISSION AGENDA: NONE.
13. PUBLIC INPUT: NONE.
14. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 11:20 p.m.
APPROVED AS AMENDED: JUNE 19, 1996