Item 11-A

 

Planning Commission Meeting: September 7, 2005                         Santa Monica, California

                                                                                                                                                           

 

TO:                  Planning Commission

 

FROM:            City Staff

 

SUBJECT:     Opportunities and Challenges Report for the Land Use and Circulation Elements Project (Discussion Item 11-A)

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

The Opportunities and Challenges Report was released for public review on July 29, 2005; it is the second milestone work product since the project was initiated last year and provides the direction for future land use and circulation analysis. Information in the report is presented in four chapters. The first chapter includes several overarching policy questions that build on initial public outreach, the existing environment, and anticipated trends, both locally and regionally. The broad concepts identified in the Emerging Themes Report (April 2005) have been translated into policy questions that highlight the themes’ significance and the tradeoffs that may be required to accomplish the themes. The analysis also frames the potential impacts these tradeoffs may have on future policy decisions. The questions focus broadly on regional influences; neighborhood conservation; economic vitality; transit and land use linkages; and, urban design. Woven throughout the questions and documented in the report are longstanding policy issues related to housing affordability, sustainability, active living, preservation and other City priorities. Recognizing that some areas of the City may warrant further study because of pressures to change or remain the same, or because of other unique land use and circulation opportunities, Focus Areas are identified for more in-depth planning and transportation analysis.

 

Chapter 2 analyzes existing conditions and trends in the context of the Emerging Themes to identify opportunities and challenges that advance the initial outreach effort. Information from this and the following chapters were used to support the policy discussion at the beginning of the report. Chapters 3 and 4, respectively, provide the context for the analysis with detailed information on the City’s existing environment, or conditions, and anticipated trends.

 

DISCUSSION

 

The Opportunities and Challenges Report was previously transmitted to the Planning Commission. Since its release the report has been available at City Hall, the main and branch libraries and posted on the project website. The report was provided to all who requested a copy, including the Landmarks Commission, Architectural Review Board and Housing Commission. The report is also available on compact disc, which was distributed at an informal open house held at the Ken Edwards Center in August. The purpose of the community meeting was to present the broad policy questions identified in the report and provide an opportunity for community members to discuss the report findings with other interested attendees. Participants were asked to identify additional policy questions that they believe may have been missed and write letters to the Planning Commission and City Council. Information received from the open house community meeting is included with this report as Attachment A. Over 50 people attended the event.

 

The Architectural Review Board and Landmarks Commission have been discussing the overall project. Comments from the Board and Commission are also included with this report as Attachment B and C, and will be forwarded on to the City Council.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

The City Council is scheduled to discuss this Opportunities and Challenges report on September 27, 2005. It is anticipated that the Council will direct staff to proceed with the preparation of alternatives plans and trade-off analysis, consistent with the findings in the report, broad policy questions and focus areas – as possible modification. To that end, staff seeks the Planning Commission’s comments on the report and direction as to whether the policy questions and focus areas, which form the framework for the next project phase, are on track or if and how they should be modified. The Planning Commission’s comments will be forwarded to the City Council.

 

 

Prepared by:              Amanda Schachter, Planning Manager

                                    Lucy Dyke, Transportation Planning Manager

                                    Jonathan Lait, AICP, Principal Planner

                                    Beth Rolandson, Senior Transportation Planner

                                    Liz Bar-El, AICP, Senior Planner

                                    Michelle Glickert, Transportation Planning Associate

                                    Tony Kim, Associate Planner

                                    Betsy Kollgaard, Administrative Analyst

                                    Planning and Community Development Department

 

Attachments:                                  

A.           Open House Correspondence (August 16, 2005)

B.           Architectural Review Board Memo

C.          Recommendations of the Landmarks Commission

D.          Other Correspondence: Santa Monica Conservancy (August 29, 2005)