PCD:AS:JL: F:\CityPlanning\Share\PC\STRPT\06\PC Goals &
Objectives.doc
Planning Commission Meeting: June 7,
2006
TO: Honorable Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Staff
SUBJECT: Land Use and Circulation Elements Draft
Goals and Objectives and Public Input
INTRODUCTION
This
report transmits Land Use and Circulation Element draft goals and objectives,
and comments received in response to public outreach on this topic.
BACKGROUND
The
City Council directed staff in January to draft Land Use and Circulation
Element goals and to conduct additional public outreach. The goals and
objectives developed from this process are included with this report as Attachment A. The attached Information Item (Attachment B) provides additional detail regarding
Council’s direction and staff’s approach on this effort. The Information Item also summarizes the
project’s multi-faceted community outreach components and how the information
gathered through this process formed the basis for key project work
products. An attachment included with
the Information Item also explains and illustrates the role and relationship of
goals, objectives and policies in a General Plan.
Notably,
goals are broad statements that set a general direction, or express an ideal
future end, and are rarely quantifiable or time-dependent. Objectives provide a
greater level of specificity and serve as an intermediate step toward attaining
a goal; objectives can be measured and achieved within a specific timeframe.
Policies are specific action statements that guide the decision-making process
and will be decided upon after a preferred plan is selected.
In
addition to framing the goals, preliminary objectives language was established
to further define and reinforce the intent of each goal. The objectives also serve as measurement tools
to evaluate the plan’s effectiveness in successfully accomplishing the
specified goal. The phrases and language used to develop initial draft goals
and objectives came from a variety of comments received from early public
outreach efforts. Initial draft goals were also included in the referenced
Information Item.
The
public has had four opportunities to respond to the draft goal language,
including, a public workshop held at
It
is anticipated that the Planning Commission will review the public input and
revised draft goal / objective language and offer suggestions to modify these
statements in order to better articulate the public’s sentiment and refine the
project’s direction. The Planning Commission may make a recommendation to the
City Council to affirm, or not affirm, the draft goal language.
DISCUSSION
The
initial draft goals have been revised based on public comments received through
the outreach efforts. As a result, new goals were created, related concepts
merged, and some goals were found to be applicable to both Land Use and
Circulation. The revised goals and objectives are presented in this report as
Attachment A.
Draft
Goals and Objectives
Each
goal has been reviewed in light of the public comments received. One draft goal
proposed in the Circulation Element was added to the Land Use Element set of
goals regarding environmental responsibility. Additionally, one new goal was
drafted for each element that promotes the underlying theme of all goals, which
is to care for and protect the quality of life in Santa Monica; this goal is entitled
Community Care. Two other goals from each element related to the regional setting
and design were merged into common goal language under the headings of Local
Identity/Regional Context and Urban Design. While the elements share four goals
that are similarly worded, the objectives used to achieve these goals are
plan-specific. Having similar goal language in each element reinforces the
interrelatedness of the documents.
The
Planning Commission’s review of the draft goals and objectives should consider
1) whether the goals accurately reflect public sentiment; 2) whether the
objective language begins to provide a greater understanding of the goals; and
3) whether additional language is appropriate at this time to measure future
plan alternatives. The objectives associated with the draft goals represent a
starting point. More objectives will be identified as the project continues;
the Planning Commission can also recommend other objectives be added. At later
project phases, policies will be considered to implement the goals and
objectives.
The
Planning Commission may also want to consider the similarity in goal language
between the two elements. Should the goal language be more distinct to each
element, or should an effort be made to match other related goals concepts?
Traffic
Methodology
There
has been recent discussion regarding the City’s traffic methodology and an
expressed interest to establish new methodology criteria in advance of
completing the Land Use and Circulation Element. While it has been envisioned
that a new traffic methodology would be established after the Elements had been
adopted, work has begun to advance this effort. Specifically, staff will lead a
seminar on the current project evaluation methodology, collect some baseline
data, and further identify and develop a means and method for evaluating
transportation system performance beyond peak-hour delays.
Next
Steps
Following
the Planning Commission’s review, the draft goal and objective language along
with the public input, will be forwarded to the City Council for its endorsement
of the project’s direction. Once received, staff and consultant will continue
efforts to develop a workbook that will analyze the goals to different plan
alternatives. The workbook will illustrate trade offs between certain policy
decisions and provide a forum for public dialogue that will begin to refine a
community vision of
Included
with the Information Item, in Attachment B, is
a short and long term project schedule. Given recent Council-level discussions
regarding state-wide initiatives and the potential need to conduct certain
analysis and prepare necessary reports and ordinances, this schedule may shift.
Prepared
by: Land Use and Circulation
Element Project Team
Planning and Community
Development Department
Attachments:
B.
City Council Information Item, dated March 2006
C.
Public Input from Four Outreach Events (Arranged by
Goal)
ATTACHMENT
A - DRAFT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Circulation
Goals & Objectives
Effective Transportation System: A balance of transportation choices for
residents, employees, and visitors to easily get around
Universal Safety: A secure environment for pedestrians, cyclists,
transit-riders and drivers
Urban
Design: Places, spaces and
activities that enhance the human experience
Local Identity/Regional Context: A distinct local community that is regionally
connected
Environmental Responsibility: A community in which human activity respects the
environment and protects it for future generations
Community Care: A community that is responsive to the diverse
interests and social needs of its residents, businesses and visitors
Land Use
Goals & Objectives
Balanced
Growth: A diverse and inclusive
community supported by balanced growth
Enjoyment of Resources: The continued enjoyment of and access to natural
and cultural assets
Connected Neighborhoods: A community of safe, secure, and connected
neighborhoods with quality public spaces and amenities
Urban
Design Places, spaces and
activities that enhance the human experience
Local Identity / Regional Context: A distinct local community that is regionally
connected
Environmental Responsibility: A community in which human activity respects the
environment and protects it for future generations
Community Care: A community that is responsive to the diverse
interests and social needs of its residents, businesses and visitors
ATTACHMENT B - CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION ITEM, DATED
MARCH 2006
INFORMATION ITEM
TO: Mayor
and Councilmembers
FROM: Andy
Agle, Interim Director, Planning and Community Development
SUBJECT: Land
Use and Circulation Elements Project Update
INTRODUCTION
This report responds to the Council’s direction to
establish goals to guide the Land Use and Circulation Elements (LUCE)
project. The report identifies draft
goals, based on public input and policy direction on the project to date, and
identifies a public process that will be used to refine and evaluate the draft
goals. Once refined and approved by the
Planning Commission and Council, the goals will provide a framework for
evaluation of project alternatives, trade-offs and implementation efforts.
BACKGROUND
The proposed process to establish goals builds on the
efforts completed in earlier phases of the project and supports and complements
upcoming phases of the project. The
first phase, Initial Outreach and Analysis, is complete and the second phase,
Alternatives and Trade-offs, will continue forward once initial goals have been
approved. Preliminary work has also
begun toward the task of rewriting the City’s Zoning Ordinance.
The initial phase of updating the LUCE involved a
comprehensive public outreach effort.
This community-engagement process generated a significant outpouring of
visions and ideas for what Santa Monica could look and feel like in 20 years
and how improvements could be made to the way people move around the city. This
feedback was received from several Citywide workshops, dozens of community
forums, telephone, internet and transportation surveys, and walking tour
guidebooks that over 900 people who live and work in Santa Monica completed and
mailed back to City Hall. This and other information was posted and remains
available on the project websites (www.shapethefuture2025.net
and http://motion.santa-monica.org).
The input from the initial outreach efforts was
documented in the April 2005 Emerging Themes Report (http://www.shapethefuture2025.net/pdf/EmergingThemesReport.pdf).
Following the initial outreach efforts, the Planning Commission and City
Council accepted twelve Emerging Themes (Attachment A) as a reflection of
public sentiment, understanding that ideas and concepts may be further refined
as the planning process progresses.
These twelve themes are similar to goals in that they express the
community’s vision for the future.
The July 2005 Opportunities and Challenges Report
followed the release of the Emerging Themes Report and concluded the project’s
first phase. Presenting and analyzing data and trends related to land use,
transportation, and environmental conditions, the report establishes a
framework for analysis and evaluation of community ideas and expectations in
relation to data and other information about the City and region. For example,
the report highlights the challenge of providing affordable work-force housing
in a community with high property values. The report also identifies well
established neighborhoods as an opportunity to maintain and further define
The community outreach and data analysis presented in
these reports set the stage for the second phase of the update process,
consideration of Alternatives and Trade-offs.
During this project phase, policy issues and land use distribution
concepts are analyzed to support public dialogue and debate about Santa
Monica’s future, such as integrated transportation systems, housing diversity
and sustainable economies, to name a few.
The second phase will be supported by an Alternatives
Workbook, which is intended to assist the community and decision-makers in
understanding the interrelationships, consequences and trade-offs of potential
policy decisions. Each planning
alternative will be evaluated against the goals and objectives confirmed
through the forthcoming outreach process, thereby providing a framework for
assessing the merits of different concepts and approaches.
Questions regarding how much new growth the City will
plan for, and where, will be illuminated through an active public discussion
based on analysis, understanding of consequences and trade-offs, and innovative
problem-solving. Understanding how changes in density or circulation policy can
strengthen or weaken the community is a significant component of the debate,
but not the only one. Also important is to understand how the plans can
preserve places that contribute to the cultural fabric, how design and
transportation solutions can reduce our dependence on limited resources, and
how we can provide more usable open space for passive and active recreational
use. These are just a few of the issues that will be explored in the workbook
and illustrated by example with three distinct land-use alternatives, so that
the impacts of certain policy decisions are better anticipated.
The Alternatives Workbook will be used in a series of
public outreach events designed to stimulate this public discussion and to
develop a consensus as to a preferred vision for
DISCUSSION
In many ways, project goals have been articulated
through the initial outreach effort and expressed in part through the Emerging
Themes. The list of twelve themes, however, is somewhat incomplete and
duplicative, and combines elements of goals, objectives, policies and
implementing programs. While it was originally envisioned that precise goals
would emerge after the community’s consideration of alternatives and
trade-offs, establishing preliminary goals at this stage is expected to help
narrow the range of options to study and better focus the discussion; it will
also help reduce some of the uncertainly about project direction.
The draft goals for the Land Use and Circulation Elements
(included as Attachment D) reflect a staff effort to distill the community
aspirations and policy direction expressed in the initial project effort into
statements of what the community would like to achieve through its land use and
circulation elements. Three months have
been programmed for the community to respond to and offer suggestions for
modifying, eliminating or adding to the draft LUCE goals. The proposed outreach effort includes a
Citywide workshop, an interactive display to be set up at the Main Library and
used at the Santa Monica Festival in May, and a feedback forum on the City’s
web site. Presentations will be made to
the Planning Commission before and after the outreach process and to City Council
after the outreach process.
In order to frame the discussion and support the
continued development of the plan, the outreach program will include a
discussion of the role of goals, objectives and policies within the context of
a General Plan. Attachment C explains
and illustrates these roles. The vast
amount of public input received during the initial project phase addresses not
only goals, but also objectives and policies.
To facilitate the establishment of goals, staff will not only present
draft goals, but also objectives and policies that might derive from the
goals. By seeing the goals in this
context, participants can better understand whether the goals support the kinds
of objectives, policies and programs that are important for
Project Timeline
The LUCE project was originally intended to be a
two-year effort which started in Fall 2004. Since project initiation,
additional time has been added to expand the opportunity for public input on
milestone work products, to create separate hearings for Planning Commission
and City Council (rather than joint hearings), to accommodate heavy Commission
and Council agendas, and to maximize public involvement. Most recently, the
time period during which the consideration of Alternatives and Trade-offs was
expected to occur is now being used for consideration of goals. Individually, these changes to the timeline
are relatively minor. Collectively,
however, they do effect the project’s completion date. Attached to this report
are two revised schedules; a short-term schedule for goal-setting and
consideration of alternatives and trade-offs (Attachment G), and an estimated
long-range schedule with a revised completion timeframe (Attachment H).
Next Steps
In April, the Planning Commission will consider the
specific elements of the outreach process for the LUCE goal-setting
effort. A goal-setting community
workshop is expected to occur in late April, followed by the Library, Internet,
and Santa Monica Festival feedback efforts.
Prepared
by: Andy Agle, Interim
Director
Ellen
Gelbard, Deputy Director
Gay Forbes,
Development Services Officer
Amanda
Schachter, Planning Manager
Jonathan
Lait, AICP, Principal Planner
Liz Bar-El,
AICP, Senior Planner
Tony Kim,
Associate Planner
Peter James,
Assistant Planner
Lucy Dyke,
Transportation Planning Manager
Beth
Rolandson, AICP, Senior Transportation Planner
Michelle
Glickert, Transportation Planning Associate
Planning and
Community Development Department
cc: Planning
Commission
Attachments:
A.
Emerging Themes
(Excerpted from the Emerging Themes Report)
B.
Policy Questions
(Excerpted from the Opportunities & Challenges Report)
C.
Role of Goals,
Objectives and Policies in a General Plan
D.
Draft Goals:
Land Use and Circulation Elements
E.
Draft Common
Elements and Common Options
F.
Land Use and
Circulation Elements: Process To Date
G.
Short Term
Project Schedule (Through Phase 2 – Alternatives)
H.
Attachment A
Emerging Themes
A unique city with a
strong sense of community.
A city rich in
amenities, within walking distance to shops and services from neighborhoods. While in its outlook and character
A diverse and inclusive
city.
well as places for
families and children. In terms of its physical character,
A community built at an
appropriate town-scale. Reinforcing
the theme of a small and unique town, the height and scale of new buildings
should complement the existing fabric
of neighborhoods and
commercial areas. Existing height limits should be maintained, and high rise
buildings are not appropriate in any part of
A city of strong
neighborhoods, protected from commercial and industrial uses. Neighborhoods should be protected from encroachment
of commercial and industrial uses, and have slow and safe traffic. New
development should be in keeping with the existing scale of neighborhoods.
A pedestrian and
bicycle-friendly place. Streets and
connections between various activity areas shall be improved to create
comfortable and safe environments for pedestrians. Development should be
friendly and engaging to pedestrians.
A city rich in its
array of transit offerings. The need
to support transit enjoys overwhelming community support. Santa Monicans want
to see high-quality regional transit services, such as light-rail and rapid
bus, at a level that offers advantages over private autos for regional trips,
as well as local services that are safe and fast and convenient enough to
compete with autos for local trips. Santa Monicans especially support
environmentally-friendly transit vehicles and continue to express specific
support for light rail (with a terminus in downtown and a route along
Exposition).
A city where traffic
and parking work. Automobile traffic
should flow smoothly, without disrupting neighborhood living. Park and ride
lots, shuttles, and free or permitted parking by residents should be explored
to facilitate easy movement. Transportation and land use patterns should be
designed to work synergistically.
A city of balanced
growth.
A city with attractive
boulevards. The city’s major boulevards
should be improved with increased landscaping, enhanced sidewalks, and
additional parking. Mixed-use centers combining shopping and new housing
replacing aging uses along the city’s major corridors may help meet multiple
objectives, including promoting neighborhood accessibility to shops and
services, housing affordability, aesthetic renewal, and jobs and homes in
proximity to transit. Residents would like to see the boulevards in walking
distance from their homes developed with the kinds of shops and restaurants
they like to frequent.
A safe and secure
community. The city’s neighborhoods
should be secure; people, including children, should be safe walking or
bicycling to schools or work. The City should address homeless issues so that
public areas, including, parks, streets, and transit vehicles can be pleasantly
enjoyed.
An environmentally
sustainable place. Santa Monica
should continue to emphasize “green” development, recycling, development
patterns that encourage walking and cycling, clean air and water, and reuse of
older buildings.
Attachment B
Policy Questions
1.
How can
2.
What role can
visitor-servers play in
3.
How much new
housing should
4.
What types of
new development could fulfill the City’s diversity and quality of life
objectives?
5.
How best can the
existing industrial areas meet
6.
How best can the
character and quality of
7.
What is the
appropriate scale and mix of uses for boulevard commercial corridors?
8.
What is the
appropriate scale and character of specialty commercial corridors?
9.
How can the City
maintain its economic vitality and protect economic advantages?
10.
How can the City
foster small businesses and establishments to maintain its uniqueness?
11.
How can
facilities that support a properly balanced transportation system be created?
12.
How much parking
is the appropriate amount for the community and what is the City’s role in
facilitating its availability?
13.
How best can
transit-oriented development be promoted?
14.
What is the
appropriate scale, intensity and character of new development, particularly in
areas that are likely to experience change over the coming 20 years, such as
the industrial areas, along corridors, and public spaces?
15.
Other than
policies directing new development, what resources are available to the City to
implement the Community’s vision? Which strategies are the most important? Are
there resources that might be overlooked by a traditional land use and
circulation plan?
16.
How best can
Attachment C
Role of Goals, Objectives and
Implementation Policies in a General Plan
Understanding the roles of and differences between
goals, objectives and implementation policies is critical to shaping a general
plan. While all are components of a
general plan document, each has a different purpose.
Goals: Goals are
broad statements which set general direction. They express an ideal for the
future, rather than a specific action, and are rarely quantifiable or time-
dependent.
Objectives: Objectives represent a finer level of specificity
and serve as an intermediate step toward attaining a goal. Objectives can be
measured and achieved within a specific timeframe. Because an objective seeks
to bridge a goal’s broader meaning into real action, several objectives are
generally identified for each goal.
Policies: Policies are
specific action statements, which guide the decision-making process once the
plan is adopted.
The following example illustrates the relationship
between goals, objectives and policies. At this stage we are establishing draft
goals. Objectives and policies can be contemplated, but are not the focus of
this part of the process; these more action-oriented statements can be more
fully realized following the consideration of alternatives and trade-offs.
Example
Illustrating the Relationship Between Goals, Objectives and Policies:
|
Draft Goal |
Sample Objectives |
Key Policy Considerations |
|
A diverse
and inclusive community supported by balanced growth |
· Promote a balanced and diverse
economy that serves all income levels and preserves and enhances the City’s
economic well-being. · Provide affordable housing
opportunities that support all income levels, age groups, household size and
special needs · Encourage the retention and
creation of quality jobs for people with varied skills · Provide for a range of land uses
and activities that support the needs and desires of local residents, workers
and visitors |
·
Affordable retail ·
Sustainable economies ·
Local availability of goods and services (keep dollars w/in city) ·
Retain small business ·
·
Clean industry ·
Tourism ·
Entertainment ·
Dining ·
Auto dealers ·
Affordable housing: workforce housing ·
Household size/type: Family, senior, mixed use, single family homes,
multi-family buildings ·
Needs: Transitional, homeless, senior, assisted living · Jobs that support a variety of
housing opportunities · Skilled and unskilled job
opportunities · Preserve and support small
businesses (enterprise and incubator sites) · Professional jobs in retail,
service, office, industry, visitor accommodations, technology, research and
development, etc.) · Require workforce housing for
large developments · Job training and advancement
opportunities · Incentives to higher local
residents · Housing typologies · Commercial typologies (retail,
service, entertainment, office, technology) · Industrial typologies (manufacturing,
distribution, storage, building supplies, etc.) · Institutional typologies (medical,
education, government, research) · Open space and parks typologies · Social service typologies (child
care, elderly care) |
Attachment D
Draft Goals:
Land Use and Circulation Elements
|
|
|
·
Balanced
Growth: A diverse and inclusive
community supported by balanced growth
·
Local
Identity / Regional Context: A
distinct local identity within the regional context ·
Enjoyment
of Resources: The continued
enjoyment of and access to natural and
cultural assets ·
Great
Design: Sustainable and innovative
buildings and places with quality urban
design ·
Connected
Neighborhoods: A community of
safe, secure, and connected neighborhoods
with quality public spaces and amenities |
|
Draft Circulation
Element Goals |
|
·
Effective
System: A balance of
transportation choices for residents, employees,
and visitors to easily get around ·
Universal
Safety: A secure environment for
pedestrians, cyclists, transit- riders
and drivers ·
Great
Public Spaces: Well-designed
public spaces that support travel, recreation
and social interaction ·
Regional
Integration: A local
transportation system that is integrated within the regional context ·
Environmental
Responsibility: A transportation
system that minimizes pollution
and motor vehicle congestion and preserves the natural environment |
Attachment E
Draft Common Elements and Common
Options
|
Common Elements: Elements that will be included in the preferred alternative regardless
of elements chosen from alternative choices |
|
·
Integrated Land Use and Transportation: including connections between existing activities |
|
·
Historic Preservation: integrate the community’s historic qualities to
maintain its scale and character; seek to preserve structures and
neighborhoods that contribute and honor |
|
·
Sustainability: incorporate land use and transportation policy that promotes environmental
and economic sustainability |
|
·
Building Reuse: maximize opportunities to reuse existing structures |
|
·
Housing:
preserve existing housing while pursuing objectives for diversity |
|
·
Neighborhoods: Preserve the scale and character of existing residential
neighborhoods |
|
·
Education:
support educational opportunities for all Santa Monicans including the needs
of schools and students |
|
·
Open Space:
support goals of the Open Space element, including the concept of all public
property as open space opportunities |
|
·
Public Safety: reinforce sense of community through neighborhood safety |
|
·
Childcare:
continue to prioritize quality early education for children and their
families |
|
·
Active Living: promote healthy communities through design and programs |
|
·
Arts and Culture: including support for a growing creative community |
|
·
Economic Vitality: including opportunities for local and community retail |
|
·
Partnerships: meet community goals through strong relationships with
organizations, including medical and educational institutions |
|
·
Existing Plans: accommodate |
|
·
Regional Context: acknowledge influence on housing market, economy and travel demand
and participate in greater regional solutions |
|
·
Quality Design: enhance streetscapes, commercial and residential areas through
quality urban design, including private property design standards |
|
Options: Options
that must be resolved regardless of Common Elements or Plan Alternative |
|
·
Incentives for
sustainable business practices |
|
·
Incentives for
preservation of residential neighborhoods |
|
·
Incentives for
preservation of rent-controlled housing |
|
·
Incentives to
support preservation of historic resources |
|
·
Incentives to
support preservation and expansion of open space |
|
·
Incentives for
preservation and expansion of childhood education facilities |
|
·
Incentives for
preservation and expansion of local and local-serving businesses |
|
·
Incubator
districts for sustainable industry and/or small business |
|
·
Incentives for
adaptive reuse of existing buildings |
|
·
Degree of
integration to strengthen other General Plan policies and city goals /
objectives |
|
·
Annual growth
caps |
|
·
Local shuttle
system |
|
·
Shared parking
districts |
|
·
Feasibility of
an additional Exposition light rail stop near 14th or 17th
Streets |
|
·
Transition of
areas around proposed light stops/stations prior to the construction of light
rail |
|
·
Conversion of
existing rights-of-way to bike lanes, widened sidewalks, transit lanes |
|
·
“Woonerf”
style mixed-use streets |
|
·
Parking
pricing strategies to maximize parking efficiency and encourage alternatives |
|
·
Parking
requirement modifications to reflect use and encourage alternatives |
|
·
Second
dwelling units in R1 zones |
|
·
Transfer of
Development Rights to preserve historic or existing buildings |
|
·
Rate and type
of change of units in multifamily districts |
|
·
Diversity of
housing |
|
·
Accommodations
for single-occupancy vehicles |
|
·
Small
neighborhood markets in multi-family residential districts |
|
·
Transportation
impact fee |
Attachment F
Process to Date Flow Chart

Attachment G
Short Term Project Schedule

Attachment H

ATTACHMENT C - PUBLIC INPUT FROM FOUR OUTREACH EVENTS
(ARRANGED BY GOAL)
Balanced Growth – Land Use Element
A diverse and inclusive community supported by
balanced growth
|
Library Comments |
|
SM needs
more affordable housing. At present, it is slanted toward more affluent
people. You should have balanced growth.
Instead, City Hall is going crazy buying properties & spending
money needlessly. Just look at this library - so much space - shelves without
books. This building is a white
elephant. City hires a City manager
who was kicked out of |
|
Solar
Power. |
|
Green
Buildings |
|
Stop
selling us off to developers. Lots of
SM's are losing their sense of ownership as the City becomes glossier &
more commercialized ad sold out to commerce & tourism. I know several families as well as myself
that are likely to move away, rent control or not, because "our"
city no longer feels like home. |
|
SM is
already overgrown. Parking is nearly
impossible, yet you continue to permit overbuilding. Balanced growth is an oxymoron - unlimited
growth is the philosophy of the cancer cell-as Paul Ehrlich said, "Don't
permit multi-unit town homes on single-family lots. Accept that there are limits already
exceeded." |
|
Many
people would like to live by the sea, but can't. Why should there be any government
subsidies in this city? Are middle
class people subsidized? I think not. |
|
Need to
update our law library at court house. Also need more room in the filing
office (Small Claims) |
|
Make a
vote to create a law making mandatory use of recyclables by every business. |
|
"Balanced
Growth" is a euphemism the goal of which is to destroy the people's
place nibbling at the edges until the whole cake is gone! Yes, this is an outrageous statement in US,
but just apply it to |
|
Homeowners
are not exactly the people you want deciding growth issues-they oppose every
sq. ft. of it. Try reaching out to
those who can't afford the SM experience because of no growth. Keep some open space & not get so BIG
we can't move. |
|
|
|
Internet Feedback Forum Comments |
|
Encourage pocket parks along foot commuter routes
especially near fast food |
|
Above all preserve buildings of character & structural
merit |
|
Focus on economic diversity above all other goals to
preserve that ideal. |
|
More affordable housing |
|
“Balance” should be based on community needs |
|
Limit demolitions of smaller homes & encourage their
re-use by smaller families w/ smaller needs |
|
Encourage local hiring |
|
More efficient less expensive project approval processes
for home owners, small business, historic restoration more affordability!! |
|
Encourage incentives creation of workforce by large
employers |
|
Provide incentives for retailers of higher quality to be
present on |
|
Create another city-owned mobile home park like |
|
Maintain affordable visitor accommodations |
|
We need a moratorium on growth to keep our current balance
of tourism / industry. |
|
Community Workshop Comments |
|
Help the
homeless not be homeless |
|
Returning
some 'land uses' to their natural state
so people can understand the history of SM's land |
|
Encourage
housing for |
|
Jobs/housing
balance |
|
School/employer
partnerships |
|
Affordable
retail & services |
|
Put a
choke hold on the developers |
|
Don't
allow high rises |
|
Opportunity
for teachers to buy homes in |
|
Attractive
covered shelters for homeless |
|
Beautiful
natural environment- more palm trees, cleaner beaches. |
|
Targeted
land use (i.e. gardens) that make up for what the economically disadvantaged
residents do not have |
|
Interested
in vacant properties useful to move dislocated workers currently living on
streets in |
|
Promote
civics workshops that encourage basic community caring |
|
Promote
lifelong learning development |
|
Decrease
and control traffic |
|
Allow
only sustainable development |
|
Maintain
zero population growth |
|
Reduce
traffic congestion |
|
Require
that all new building be low density |
|
Stop
exempting large mixed use building from public review |
Connected
Neighborhoods – Land Use Element
A community
of safe, secure, and connected neighborhoods with quality public spaces and
amenities
|
Library Comments |
|
Improve
the Pico corridor so that people in that neighborhood don't feel so
disconnected. |
|
More
mixed use buildings. |
|
More
mixed use development. |
|
More park
& green areas. |
|
|
|
Keep as
much historical relics as possible-build around what’s already there
harmoniously-keep historic buildings and prevent new high skyscrapers-limit
the height of construction. |
|
Dial a
ride-more funding-extend hours & trips to events. Trams/Jitney service.
Drinks-coffee/tea=more access to "safe" bathrooms. "Pico" buses always overcrowded
due to SMC students-more service during college peak hours. Miss the sandcastle building inside of SM
mall. That was so special-ongoing work
& finished product. |
|
Problems
to be addressed: 1. Noise in |
|
You need
dip warning signs on your streets! |
|
Internet Feedback Forum Comments |
|
Neighborhood
shops to walk to |
|
trams or
shuttles |
|
bike or
ped paths w green strips |
|
Increase
'sense of community' through community-building activities so people will
build trust |
|
Safely
get residents to walk to activities even at night (we need more lights!) |
|
fund
community centers |
|
maintain
neighborhood scale |
|
protect
from traffic/parking impacts |
|
I know
this is a contentious issue, but something must be done about the homeless
people who take over every public space.
Personal safety, comfort and pride cannot coexist with homelessness! |
|
Clean and
repair sidewalks |
|
Penalize
careless pet owners |
|
put
parking lots in back, not front of parks, businesses, schools, etc |
|
congestion-
make SMC build lots more parking underground |
|
First
consider the desire of the particular community, neighborhood. What do they
want? |
|
Creating
network ... sounds like public transportation system. can it get any better,
maybe? sm really does quite well on
the open spaces department and obviously considers it very important |
|
please
help me to realize a solution to move displaced workers from the streets of
SM and LA. I am currently seeking funding and would like a partnership with
each city to move forward |
|
more
parks and public spaces |
|
banish
graffiti 'artists' and taggers from the city |
|
do not
build islands in thoroughfares as you did on |
|
A permit
process that makes it easier for neighborhood parties |
|
Community Workshop Comments |
|
Waiving
the cost of parking at community events |
|
Provide a
reasonable period of free parking for the public libraries |
|
Some of
the dog parks need to be more people friendly |
|
Enlist
the homeless to help pick-up trash – I’ll tip someone who needs it if I see a
good job |
|
It is the
main reason I live here – my child is safer in my view – add green space
WITHIN school system, more security there |
|
ELIMINATE
speed bumps EVERYWHERE Oh, & D. ps too – so you can get from 1
neighborhood to the next |
|
Parks to
have built – in centrifuge like water features |
|
Encourage
& facilitate construction & retrofitting of front porches |
|
Encourage
people to clean up the yards – mainly picking up trash & keeping bushes
trimmed back from sidewalks |
|
Enlist
trash collectors, meter readers, mail carriers, dog walkers, etc. to identify
problems – graffiti, overgrown bushes & trees, buckling sidewalks,
potholes |
|
Identify
& work within willing property owners to develop more pocket parks &
green space |
|
More
outdoor cafes on |
|
Eliminate
dark 24-hour slum bars along Pico |
|
Preserve
existing neighborhood scale. Minimize more density. |
Great Design – Land
Use Element
Sustainable
and innovative buildings and places with quality urban design
|
Library Comments |
|
Business
should be at the sidewalk - no more strip malls. This also encourages walking. All commercial development should be of
sustainable design & include solar panels. |
|
Tax
incentives for converting old, poorly designed commercial areas (i.e. strip
malls into multiuse structures). |
|
Continue
emphasis on good visual design/archit. |
|
Buildings
should conform to the environment in |
|
Low
density (bldgs) solar design, change codes for new construction. No househeums?? In Rizone. |
|
Make
recycling bins available around the city, like Palos Verdes. |
|
Recycling
stations bigger. |
|
The city
should not dictate the design of build-up. Standards can be set, but
individuals should make final design. |
|
Do not
overbuild. No more than 3 story
residential, 4 story business! |
|
No high
rise buildings. |
|
Free
wireless internet. |
|
Great
drought tolerant landscaping. |
|
Don't
make everything the same |
|
I like the
way the city is developing - the human scale of it. Not a giant wind tunnel of impersonal
bldgs. |
|
Consider
transfer of development rights to retain historic buildings/older building
areas that everyone likes (like |
|
Internet Feedback Forum
Comments |
|
Strong
preservation incentives |
|
Streetscape
improvements |
|
Particularly
preserve Spanish-style buildings |
|
Welcoming
entry at SM-Centinela |
|
Clean
streets and alleys |
|
No
graffiti |
|
No more
malls |
|
Encourage
walk-to neighborhoods like |
|
Put more
green into everything - solar, recycling everything possible, reusing,
rejecting gasoline and other particulates deemed harmful to environment. is underground living feasible, possible,
and doable or will it become necessary? maybe we can get ready by advancing
the possibilities. can we cut down on contributing to sick buildings, sick
people by at least thinking about building products we use to create the
buildings |
|
Do not
exceed current height limits |
|
Put a
stop to monster mansions |
|
Do not add
more housing to an already crowded city |
|
Get city
staff out of the design process. Let
the public judge and ARB and Commission hearings. If developers choose to propose eye sours
they deserve to have them rejected. |
|
If the
zoning code only allows for low density buildings developer focus on quality,
rather than mass, to make their money. |
|
Return to
the review process of the 1980s in which developer that chose to propose
beautiful buildings were able to go quickly to public hearings so their
projects could be quick approved. Have only firms with proven track record of
sustainability |
|
Community Workshop Comments |
|
Encourage re-use of smaller “starter” homes |
|
Analyze residential & commercial design standards |
|
Human scale buildings with outdoor space for activities |
|
Outdoor spaces conducive to people enjoying these
recreational facilities to eat, sit, read. *Central Library downtown LA *
Bryant Park in New York City of Santa Monica |
|
Limit growth of single family homes into mansions: massive
condos |
|
Art & Cultural Center @ Civic Center |
|
Encourage diversity within a generalized design standards;
change with the future |
|
More green friendly buildings (new construction,
renovations) |
|
ADAPTIVE REUSE |
|
MAINTAIN MODERATE SCALE |
|
Preserve Architectural Heritage e.g. craftsman’s,
bungalows, etc. To allow for “growth” place old structures on roofs of new
buildings. |
|
Green Space: roof top gardens / yards (think hanging
gardens) |
Local Identity/Regional Context – Land Use Element
A distinct
local identity within the regional context
|
Library Comments |
|
Begin to
limit chain businesses per block, so that certain family run, unique
businesses continue to distinguish SM's unique character. Possibly create laws that limit rent
charged for buildings of non-corporate/chain businesses. |
|
I'm so
happy & proud to see SM progressing towards becoming a greener
community. I'd like to see more bike
laws & sideway car parking (to reduce traffic). 32 year old female… |
|
Keep blue
& white police cars unique to our city.
Stop all this building & density increase. Don't need more high priced stores. Stores & businesses are needed that
residents can use. Stop control of
city by special & outside interests.
Give us back our SM beach town. |
|
Life may
not be measured by money (as per American practice), but by human
values. In fact, I know of no other
society that measures life by its financial costs. Policies should be implemented that foster
locally owned business. In particular,
no existing mom-and-pa restaurant/store/business should be displaced to make
room for a big corporation. I think we
will always be unique! |
|
Open air,
clean public spaces oriented toward park & ocean. Business space along these areas beneath
(and most of all, we do) we would be renowned for this. |
|
Keep the
Olympic rail out of |
|
No high
rise buildings! |
|
Work with
schools and SMC to develop unique city/'hood trams |
|
Supporting
local mom & pop shops so SM has it's own unique character &
isn't like every other ' |
|
Support
areas with many independent businesses, like |
|
Internet Feedback Forum
Comments |
|
Affordable homeownership |
|
Expo LRT
and Wilshire subway |
|
New
ventures do NOT include caving to the developers for the money. |
|
Develop
and subsidize local theatre |
|
Encourage
artists to stay , live & work here |
|
Encourage
athletes of all kinds to be prominent in the community |
|
Provide
support systems for displaced workers in acquired housing shared by veterans,
physically disabled, mentally impaired... |
|
Developing
more ways to tap civic responsibility of each citizen |
|
Encouraging
input from all citizens across spectrum from environmental issues to
education |
|
Emphasize
|
|
Support
local schools to the maximum extent possible |
|
Do not
allow other cities to dump their homeless upon us |
|
Return |
|
Put the
resident's needs for drivable streets over city staff's desire for more sales
and property taxes. |
|
Subject
mixed use building to discretionary control so residence can have a
meaningful say in the quality of life in |
|
Community Workshop Comments |
|
SM is one of the few great pedestrian areas in L.A.
Development that has a large parking lot along the street hurts this
pedestrian experience. It’s better when shops line the streets. |
|
We should be a leader/example for other communities -
& that would be distinct. |
|
Preserving our uniqueness means we can’t afford to
increase our density of people, visitors, workforce, etc. |
|
This is only “Important” because we’re doing pretty well
in this area. |
|
By the beach structures need to be preserved – Coastal
lifestyle supported |
|
Keep an open mind about how diverse businesses support SM
& greater community |
|
If this is about housing in the region its “very
important” |
|
MORE Multi-Family Housing this reduces traffic |
|
Keep up with the times, change with the future, follow the
demand of the market population |
|
|
|
Cultural
Center at Civic Center |
Valued Resources – Land Use Element
The continued enjoyment of and access to natural and
cultural assets
|
Library Comments |
|
Commercial
rent control. It's so sad to see
treasured businesses forced out of the promenade replaced w/national chains,
especially since taxpayers’ funds created the promenade. Make it feasible for artists & arts to
exist in this city. Right now, they're
as vulnerable as any business. |
|
Definitely
more parks and natural recreation space.
More trees throughout the city. |
|
Integrate
info into local schools & educational programs. |
|
It's this
quality of life that IS |
|
I
understand why The Lobster restaurant was built, and I enjoy the restaurant,
but I wish you could see more of the ocean from PCH. Ocean park view is great. Going N on PCH is just wall-to-wall bldg |
|
Again,
returning some spaces to their more original natural state to help educate
regarding SM's history (didn't SM used to be wetlands?) |
|
Internet Feedback Forum
Comments |
|
Increase
access to the beach and public parks |
|
Enable
access to school's open space for all residents, not just youth |
|
Preservation
incentives |
|
Arts
facilities |
|
Try to
keep the public spaces cleaner & free of trash |
|
Keep
streets and alleys clean |
|
Trees on |
|
Limit
growth |
|
Partner
parks with schools, senior centers & hospitals |
|
Partner
business with poorer schools |
|
Are
doggie bathrooms feasible |
|
Introduce
concept of shared use properties as percentage of the year instead of
bunching homeless up in a spot for certain periods only. at least open up the places used for
sleeping only to allow for use of computers, visual or audio art creation,
one on one meetings with social workers, mental health workers on a regular
basis |
|
Put a
moratorium on all new development |
|
Give
highest priority to the recommendations of the Santa Monica Conservancy |
|
Do not
build any more housing, low income or otherwise |
|
Making |
|
The city
should put its focus on how to make better use of existing buildings and
infrastructure rather than tearing down and replacing existing buildings and
infrastructure. |
|
Stop
allowing city parks for being used to feed the homeless. The stench and panhandling, caused by
homeless loitering in the parks, keeps the residents away. |
|
Community Workshop Comments |
|
Cultural center at |
|
I think this is important only to the extent that the
environment is not negatively affected. |
|
New parks & open spaces in lieu of more development |
|
Youth outreach programs to encourage art, music, etc.
& discourage gangs |
|
This is only “Important” because we’re doing ok in this
area |
|
Teach K-12 students more history of City Planning &
Development re: influence of Douglas Aircraft |
Effective System –
Circulation Element
A balance of transportation choices for
residents, employees and visitors to get around easily
|
Library Comments |
|
Yes. More buses.
Fewer vehicles. |
|
Get more
people walking & provide shuttle services for nearby shopping. |
|
More
bicycle racks (parking). Special
allowance for electric cars (free parking/free charging). |
|
Convert
parking on street to bike lanes. |
|
Convert
parking on street to bike lanes & ped paths. |
|
Encourage
the MTA to bring Phase II of their proposed expo line to |
|
Make bus
transfers for ANY SM bus, incoming or outgoing, rather than only in the
direction |
|
Introduce
timed light systems to cut down on stop & go traffic and wasted fuel. |
|
Promote
affordable housing in most city areas.
Encourage the retention of jobs for people |
|
Traffic
is getting impossible. -we need a better way of getting around. |
|
Expand
bus service, bus lanes, etc. (hybrid buses & reasonable fares). |
|
Bike
paths in city. |
|
Needs a
train system like blue lines that travel from SM to |
|
Internet Feedback Forum
Comments |
|
Friendly
fun neighborhood trams |
|
Greenscaped ped/bike paths |
|
Neighborhood
shops |
|
Blue bus
at $.50 is a great deal and can get you to most places easily. |
|
If the
objective is to reduce auto use and congestion, along with providing choices
as listed above, could institute pricing as is being done in |
|
City
shuttle for students & seniors |
|
Bike
priority routes & incentives |
|
School
carpool & walk programs |
|
The ONLY
thing I would copy from downtown |
|
Try to
come up with a better bus map for the Big Blue Bus. I'd love to use this more, but cannot make
out the bus schedule online. |
|
Subsidized
taxis for elderly |
|
Clean and
repair sidewalks |
|
Enforce
ped safety laws |
|
Speed
bumps--stop crazy drivers |
|
Prioritize
|
|
When one
thing fails (bus lanes), have the courage to drop it! |
|
Drop off
places at public facilities, malls, etc that is safe to drop off older
children and seniors. You can get more carpooling if drop off is an option |
|
Incentivize
non-polluting transportation choices and punish polluting choices (better
pedestrian & amenities, free or cheap shuttles/buses & make
anti-social gas-guzzlers pay $50+ to park/drive in SM! |
|
In san
francisco/oakland bay area original intent was to take public transportation
to Bart lines, no parking at stations or on streets. it's still a good idea |
|
There are
far too many cars moving through the city. more expansive people moving
capabilities? |
|
Auto use
is not now currently a great need, it is a desire. can we come up with
anything else? |
|
Bring
light rail to |
|
Enforce
speed limits on all streets |
|
|
|
Reduce
visitor traffic on city streets. Price
the beach lots so people use them at night.
Building a major downtown parking structure right off the freeway. |
|
Stopping
encouraging much downtown congestion by adding too many downtown parking
spaces. |
|
Promote
bicycle rider safety by reducing development which increases traffic. |
|
Provide
kiosks to dispense day passes or week passes for the Blue Bus – tourists and
residents will love 'em. Improve
interconnections between bus routes so that cross-town trips are more readily
accomplished in less time. From 20th
& |
|
Community Workshop Comments |
|
Varied
skill and wage needs. |
|
This is supremely important to me as the
environment is in crisis. Free public transport or credits to use it. |
|
DIGNIFIED PLACES to wait for THE BUS |
|
POLICY – Transit / Walking amenities such as ashtrays /
garbage cans near by |
|
AMENITIES – Laundromat[s] and grocery stores are needed in central
[Pico nbrhd] S.M. |
|
TOUGHEST OF ALL ISSUES/ carpool lanes |
|
Share a ride incentive [for Srs & those of limited
mobility] DIAL-A-RIDE past 6:00 p.m. and extra for special events |
|
Don’t worry so much about traffic by changing land use.
Live closer to work/shop |
|
Policy: buses should be smaller |
|
The orange line shows the expected wait time until the
next bus arrival – this would be very helpful if it was reliable & used
GPS. People would realize the wait time was not as long as they thought |
|
Reliability of buses – sometimes a bus is skipped due to
drivers not showing up or breaks down. |
|
BUS-ONLY LANES ON LINCOLN / WILSHIRE! |
|
More frequent Transit Service |
|
More visitor friendly transportation [i.e. trolleys] &
better publicity of these services |
|
Smaller buses for less-occupied routes running on
alternative fuel & more frequently |
|
Use smaller buses – most run part empty |
Environmental Responsibility
– Circulation Element
A transportation system that minimizes, and where
possible eliminates, pollution and motor vehicle congestion
|
Library Comments |
|
We
really, really need new public transportation systems (i.e. above ground
subway on freeway). |
|
Have a
city sponsored Flex Program with hybrid vehicles & buses. |
|
Alternative
fuel vehicles (biodiesel school buses, more biodiesel fuel stations, credit |
|
Eliminate
internal combustion driven vehicles! |
|
Get
people to walk more and make SM more pedestrian friendly. At present it is not friendly to walkers. |
|
Make a
vote to create a law making more mandatory use of recyclable materials by all
businesses. |
|
The city
already does a better job at this than LA City & County. Though this is encouraging, one ought to be
aware of the negative influence of the larger LA on the city of |
|
After
peak hours, do not run large capacity buses!
The smallest passenger buses will do, untailing the gas and smog
problem. Rationale: you do not have as
many passengers to fill large buses after hours. Makes sense. |
|
Provide
transit service to allow people to move about without driving. |
|
Lessen
the socially destructive effects of corporate tourism in SM by ending the
Olympic rail proposal at the 405. Make
SM a "bike first" city and make Olympic rail passenger board
electric blue buses for any trips west of the 405. Make car owners pay & carbon tax to pay
for their roads in SM, CA. |
|
Internet Feedback Forum Comments |
|
We
really, really need new public transportation systems (i.e. above ground
subway on freeway). |
|
Have a
city sponsored Flex Program with hybrid vehicles & buses. |
|
Alternative
fuel vehicles (biodiesel school buses, more biodiesel fuel stations, credit |
|
Eliminate
internal combustion driven vehicles! |
|
Get
people to walk more and make SM more pedestrian friendly. At present it is not friendly to walkers. |
|
Make a
vote to create a law making more mandatory use of recyclable materials by all
businesses. |
|
The city
already does a better job at this than LA City & County. Though this is encouraging, one ought to be
aware of the negative influence of the larger LA on the city of |
|
After
peak hours, do not run large capacity buses!
The smallest passenger buses will do, untailing the gas and smog
problem. Rationale: you do not have as
many passengers to fill large buses after hours. Makes sense. |
|
Provide
transit service to allow people to move about without driving. |
|
Lessen
the socially destructive effects of corporate tourism in SM by ending the
Olympic rail proposal at the 405. Make
SM a "bike first" city and make Olympic rail passenger board
electric blue buses for any trips west of the 405. Make car owners pay & carbon tax to pay
for their roads in SM, CA. |
|
Transit
lines. |
|
Don't
make it hard to drive!!!! |
|
Incentive
for mini-town-cars |
|
Develop
open air trams |
|
Can't you
build an additional parking garage over the top of Grisby's Auto Repair on
4th |
|
Again,
stopping at every traffic signal wastes time and energy. Fix it! |
|
Vertical
street parking near the Promenade |
|
Easy ped
access to all stores |
|
Mid-cross-town
bus or shuttle for north-south access |
|
It may be
time for development of infrastructure that supports green transportation
more fully |
|
Promote
hybrids in every way possible |
|
Encourage
walking by getting rid of aggressive transients and panhandlers |
|
Improve
the flow of traffic. The worst
pollution comes from cars that are stalled in traffic. |
|
Having
convenient and affordable parking directly off the |
|
Community Workshop Comments |
|
TOD & Mixed use helps get people out of their cars |
|
Less dependence on gasoline important. Hopefully all
vehicles [buses/shuttles] will be less noisy |
|
Create centers where people can do more things at once |
|
Public transit extremely important to connect all County
systems |
|
Bring EXPOLR up |
|
Have the car industry no the City carry only non polluter
cars |
|
Get Willie Nelson Biodiesel vehicles – so its clean |
|
Rezoning. Make it easier to grocery shop & bank close
to where people live, esp. on S. Monica, Pico, and |
|
Electric Rail – incentivize car pooling |
|
Make transit fun trolleys – inexpensive – smaller vehicles |
|
Use smaller buses, electric powered “jitneys’ with short
routes |
|
Partner with institutions to encourage carpooling,
cycling, working, transit |
|
Encourage TOD: built in users – co-locate transportation
& housing |
|
Increase # of stops (don’t decrease) |
|
Free public transport, or credits for using it |
|
Subsidize / make less expensive/ give credit for riding
transit |
|
More
Rapid lines – longer, going to more points? |
Regional Awareness –
Circulation Element
Local system integrated with regional
context
|
Library Comments |
|
Establish
more fixed and visible locations for educating the public about our effect on
the beach, the sea, and sea creatures & birds. Make the educational messages brief,
engaging, memorable and change them frequently to keep the passers-by engaged
& learning. |
|
Incentives
for Media Corps. To give incentives to employees to RIDE to WORK by
BICYCLE. c.f. Car Pool incentives of
'70's and 80's. Warner Bros., Sony,
etc. have many local employees who could bicycle to work. Give them some INCENTIVE. |
|
Traffic
is a mess in the LA area-we need to work together w/other local cities. |
|
Wouldn't
street congestion be better with better access to the freeway at 20 & 4th |
|
Provide
incentives to use alternative modes of transportation such as walking,
biking, public transit |
|
Internet Feedback Forum Comments |
|
Better
transit to LAX, dntn, region |
|
Safe
shuttle for school kids |
|
It needs
to be more appealing to step on to a quick transportation system than to be
in a car. This would not replace the
Big Blue Bus, which is great. It would
provide a good reason to leave the car and still be able to get around. The DASH is a quarter. Better to spend a quarter than choke the
streets with cars. |
|
Make the
city more cyclist-friendly! Right now
you risk your life riding on most city streets! |
|
Direct SM
buses to the Getty |
|
Enforce
speed limits in alleys |
|
Speed
bumps on |
|
Pedestrian
rights enforced |
|
Safe bike
lanes |
|
Cut-n
curbs for busses |
|
Make
current parking structures safer and more inviting |
|
Give
preferential parking to all residents |
|
Do not
remove left turn lanes from major boulevards |
|
We have
no shortage of regional visitors. We should
be doing nothing to encourage more regional people to visit. |
|
Community Workshop Comments |
|
Support
local downtown |
|
Routine
accommodation of bicycles in all transportation projects |
|
Light
Rail! Make bus system carry less class division |
|
Bike only
routes paralleling major roads & connecting with routes to/from
neighboring communities |
|
Develop a
tram system throughout City which connects a bus outside of City parking |
|
Support
regional transit solutions like extension of red line to the ocean |
Universal Safety – Circulation
Element
A secure environment for all pedestrians, cyclists,
transit riders and drivers
|
Library Comments |
|
I love
the "Big Blue Bus" signs.
Thank you for leaving your car at home it helps everyone (air
pollution, etc.) Sign "Thank You
for not blocking the intersection." |
|
Move the
transients and pan handlers out of city-even to a community of their
own. Like to a desert community. |
|
Stop the
no-growths and owner residents from shutting our renters and those that rent
to buy in SM. Where will children of
home-owners live? - Not in SM? |
|
Your
process is poorly designed. The
question is "What's More Important". Without comparisons, people will claim
anything is important - witness your results? |
|
More bicycle
paths - favor low-speed electrics. |
|
At
present SM is pedestrian unfriendly.
Drivers here are terrible. They
need to be educated on safe driving. |
|
More
designated bike lanes. |
|
Secure
environment. |
|
Driver
training with big diesel cars. |
|
Flashing
crosswalks. |
|
Fire
police who give petty tickets for infringements on empty streets - they
should be eliminating the reckless, aggressive drivers who speed through
crosswalks or red lights at high speeds with utter carelessness. I paid nearly $200 for a traffic ticket
infringement on an empty street that injured no one, while in the same week
countless speeders caused danger to many and went free. |
|
Internet Feedback Forum Comments |
|
More one
way streets maybe? |
|
No bikes
on busy streets |
|
Seems
pretty good now that 1-way streets are gone |
|
Safe
routes to schools program |
|
Bike
safety school programs |
|
Protect
residential streets |
|
Frustration
levels and travel times should be reduced by coordinating signal timing and
reducing 'traffic calming' measures. I hate to travel in this city, I dread
driving in this city more than any other. Enforce cell phone laws while
driving. Drivers are not focused on
driving. City is too focused on
demands that speeds be reduced. Stopping at every signal wastes time and
energy. |
|
Bicycle
paths |
|
Put
hospital and school sites as top priority for traffic and parking mitigation,
especially schools near the college! |
|
I think
education is a great idea always |
|
Install
pedestrian-operated stop signals at all problematic crosswalks |
|
Enforce
speed limit laws on |
|
Promote
flexible work hours for all businesses |
|
Reduce
development. Too much development
causes too much traffic, which reduces the safety of pedestrians and bicycle
riders. |
|
The
traffic circle on 26th & |
|
It's not
safe to ride a bike on the streets-I avoid it and only ride @the beach. |
|
Make it
illegal to talk on a cell phone while driving a car. Being a pedestrian in this town is scary, |
|
Community Workshop Comments |
|
Tickets
for cars that do not stop for pedestrians in crosswalks. Continue traffic
calming. |
|
Continue
traffic calming efforts city-wide |
|
Driver
training in High School [w/ biodiesel cars] |
|
Reduce
traffic by slowing / ceasing the continued development |
|
Additional
signage |
|
“Complete
Streets” all modes provided for |
|
Night
hours for Dial-A-Ride, safer for seniors & those w/ limited mobility |
|
Traffic
riding skills, training for cyclists is crucial |
|
In
districts designated historic, eliminate traffic to allow enjoyment of same |
|
More
streets for pedestrians only |
|
Tickets
for people jumping right hand turns which is very common now |
|
Create
“BICYCLE BOULEVARDS” [with forced turn-offs for motor vehicles – every 4-6
blocks] |
|
Increase
public transport – TRAMS |
Well Designed Spaces –
Circulation Element
Quality designed public spaces for
travel, recreation and social interaction
|
Library Comments |
|
Village -
like architectural spaces - automobile limited roadways-automobile -less roadways. |
|
The
lights at intersections stay too long red - it should be setup to move
traffic & pedestrians better. |
|
More
natural spaces - parks, trees, etc. |
|
Enforce
existing traffic laws - speed, stop signs, and traffic lights. |
|
Light! Street lights. |
|
Need to
sort out the homeless problem. It is a
stain on |
|
More
places to walk & bike safely. |
|
SM has
beautiful public areas, but they are overrun with homeless people who not
only are visually unappealing, but also smell bad & scare pedestrians. |
|
More
speed bumps. Keep parking for
residents, not business/visitors. |
|
More
public art-sculptures, fountains, murals, tile work. |
|
Internet Feedback Forum Comments |
|
Change
the most congested intersections to north/south traffic, then east/west
traffic, then All Walk. No cars and
all pedestrians can move in any direction across the street. This would eliminate all the drivers who
constantly encroach on the intersection while people are in crosswalks. This should be STRICTLY enforced. 100's of times a day, cars are threatening
pedestrians. |
|
Places to
sit in public spaces that are not commercial, i.e. promenade |
|
More
public info posted for influx of tourists yearly that make traffic so unsafe |
|
Better
entrance , more accessible to college and most schools, and pier |
|
Traffic
calming does not work. when in doubt add stop signs, not speed bumps |
|
Time
signals better to facilitate traffic flow |
|
Stop
reducing and narrowing lanes. They do
not reduce traffic or slow speeds. The
just make street for congested and dangerous. |
|
Single
family neighborhoods and one and two story retail districts encourage
pedestrian use (they are pleasant places to walk). The best way to encourage pedestrian
traffic is to down zone. |
|
Community Workshop Comments |
|
Create a
cultural center to be proud of |
|
Get the
best |
|
More
pedestrian-friendly Pier access |
|
Above
all, show GREEN – go for a |
|
“Complete
Streets” – peds, bikes, transit, cars |
|
Olympic/Stewart
bike lanes |
|
More bike
lanes, wide sidewalks where the are a lot of pedestrians |
|
Better
walking at beach – not mixed w/ bikes. Bike paths – no bikes on sidewalks |
Dots at upper portions indicate
support, lower dots – less support

