Planning Commission Meeting: June
21, 2006
Agenda Item: _9-B
To: Planning Commission
From:
Subject: Applications Development Review 05-008;
Design Compatibiliy Permit 05-003; Tract Map 05-017; Initial Study 05-004 to
allow the construction of a 22,446 square-foot, three story plus loft, 45-foot
high condominium building containing 16 artist live-work units and 60 parking
spaces within two levels of subterranean garage.
Address:
Applicant: Plus
Architects
Recommended Action
It
is recommended that the Planning Commission take the following actions subject
to findings and conditions contained in Attachment B:
1.
Adopt the Resolution adopting the attached Initial Study/Mitigated
Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program for project-related environmental impacts;
2.
Approve applications 05DR-008; 05DCP-003; 05TM-017.
Executive
Summary
The
applicant, Plus Architects, proposes to construct a new 22,446 square-foot, three-story plus loft, 45-foot high
condominium building to establish 16 new market rate artist live-work condominium
units in the Industrial Conservation (M1) District. The subject property is an entirely paved,
relatively flat rectangular site of 15,000 square feet in area.
The following issues should be
considered by the Planning Commission in its review of the proposed project and
are addressed in this report:
·
Do the proposed mitigation measures reduce the potential
significant impacts to less than significant levels?
·
Is the
proposed location, size, massing, and placement of the proposed structure on
the site, and the use of the project, compatible with and relate harmoniously
to the surrounding properties and neighborhood?
·
Is the
project and subdivision generally consistent with the Municipal Code and
General Plan?
Project / Site Information
The following table provides a
brief summary of the project location. Additional information regarding the
project’s compliance with applicable municipal regulations and the General Plan
is available in Attachment A.
Project and Site Information Table
|
Zoning District: |
M1 |
Site Location Map
|
|
Land Use |
Industrial |
|
|
Parcel Area (SF): |
15,000 SF |
|
|
Parcel
Dimensions: |
100’ W x 150’ D |
|
|
Existing On-Site
Improvements (Year Built): |
Vacant, paved
parcel |
|
|
Rent Control
Status: |
Commercial exempt |
|
|
Adjacent Zoning
Districts and Land Uses: |
Property
surrounded on all sides by commercial and industrial businesses in the M1
Zone. |
The project site is located
mid-block on the west side of
The subject property does not
contain any structures and consists of a flat, paved parking area that
currently houses vehicles from the adjacent tow truck business north of the
parcel. There are no special
entitlements or encumberances on the property that require it to provide
parking for any adjacent properties. The
site is located within an industrial neighborhood of mostly one-story
commercial and industrial buildings. However, two-story buildings are situated
on both corners of
The project involves the construction of a three-story plus
loft, 45-foot tall, condominium building containing 16 artist live-work units
and 60 parking spaces within two levels of subterranean garage. The Zoning Ordinance defines an artist studio as “a building or portion
of a building used as a place of work by an artist”, where living quarters for
the artist may be permitted, provided the living space does not exceed 50
percent of the square footage of the total studio space. Exhibition space and performance space is
specifically prohibited. The Zoning
Ordinance does not provide a definition for an “artist”.
Artist live-work studios are
permitted in the M1 District, which allows for additional building height of
three stories and 45 feet rather than two stories and 30 feet, and a
floor-area-ratio of 1.5 rather than 1.0, with approval of a Development Review
Permit. The total building area would be
approximately 22,446 square feet (1.49 FAR).
The building is designed with a central courtyard in a horseshoe
configuration open to
Although landscaping is not
required in the M1 District, the project provides 350 square-feet of
landscaping in the front yard area adjacent to the public right-of-way on
Environmental Analysis
Pursuant to California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15063, an Initial Study was
conducted and a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for this
project. The Draft Mitigated Negative
Declaration (Attachment F) was circulated for a 30-day public review
period from April 10 to May 10, 2006 and no comments were received. The Initial
Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration concluded that the project would have no
impact or a less than significant impact in each of the following areas:
Geology and Soils, Shadows, Public Services, Cumulative Impacts, Hydrology and
Water Quality, Biological Resources, Air Quality, Population and Housing, Land
Use and Planning, Transportation/Traffic, Utilities and Service System,
Economic and Social Impacts, Recreation, Agricultural Resources, Energy &
Mineral Resources, Hazards and Hazardous Materials.
In four categories,
Aesthetics, Construction, Cultural Resources and Noise, impacts during the
construction period were identified that are potentially significant and
require mitigation measures. These
measures are included in the proposed conditions of approval (Conditions #15,
16, 19, 29, 30, 32-35, and 53) and are contained in the Mitigation Monitoring
Plan attached to the Resolution adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration (Attachment F).
A traffic analysis was conducted
for the project, examining capacity and operations at two intersections in the vicinity of the project and on
The
proposed condominium buildings would cast shadows onto adjacent properties,
particularly in the wintertime when shadows are most extreme. However, shadows cast by the proposed project
would be cast on areas that either: a.: are not considered light-sensitive; or
b.) are shadowed for less time than established by the City’s significance
threshold (a three-hour period between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. at the Winter
Solstice). Therefore, shadows are
considered less than significant and mitigation measures are not required.
Project Analysis
Neighborhood
Compatibility
The project is located in a neighborhood
that is undergoing transition. While the
block is still comprised mostly of one and two-story commercial and industrial
businesses, a four-story artist studio building was constructed across the
street at
The proposed project is of similar height,
mass and scale as the existing artist studio across the street. In general, the
project’s design appears to integrate well into this eclectic industrial
neighborhood. The project is
contemporary in design and will be distinguishable within the M1 District given
the building’s articulation, use of upper story balconies, fenestration, and
façade embellishments. The variety in materials and shapes break up the
geometry of the building into smaller pieces which serve to break up the mass. This is in contrast with the typical
industrial design that is strictly functional and unembellished. However, the
overall design is respectful of its location within an industrial district by
incorporating certain design elements that are typical of industrial
buildings. These include a façade
treatment that will consist of a combination of corrugated metal panels and
smooth stucco as well as a metal catwalk and elevator in the central courtyard;
industrial-like window style and scale; a linear symmetry and boxiness of
design; and, a low profile, horizontal mass and scale that is consistent with
industrial building design. These design
considerations and materials create an overall impression of the structure that
is in character with the light industrial neighborhood, even though it will
function, in part, as a residential use.
The provision of a central open courtyard and upper-level stepbacks,
open space, and pedestrian-oriented design features such as ground-floor
windows and pedestrian street access, upper-story balconies and decks and landscaping
between the front façade and the street will ensure adequate light, air, and privacy
for the residents. Analysis of potential shadows from the building found that
they would not significantly impact the adjacent commercial uses due to the
project’s adjacency to an undeveloped, paved parking lot on the north side. Although landscaping is not required in
the M1 District, the project provides 350 square-feet of landscaping in the
front yard area adjacent to the public right-of-way on
Staff recommends that further attention be
provided to one component of the project design. The entry area appears to be overly
ornamental; however, staff believes this issue can be resolved through the
Architectural Review Board process and in no way compromises the project’s
neighborhood compatibility. Condition
#18 addresses this issue.
Neighbor Concern
Staff received one piece of written correspondence in
November of 2005 from the business owner of the adjacent property to the north
at
This business is subject to the limitations of the City’s
Noise Ordinance (SMMC 4.12.110), which limits the decibel level in an
industrial zone, on a 24-hour basis, to 70 decibels within any 15-minute
interval. Residents of the proposed
project have the ability to contact the Santa Monica Police Department if
violations of the Noise Ordinance occur. Moreover, air quality violations relative to
fumes emanating from the tow trucks can be reported to the South Coast Air
Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Staff
has incorporated a Condition of Approval (Condition #26) which requires the
developer to install dual-paned windows on the north side of the building in
order to address the potential adverse noise impacts from the adjacent
automobile tow-yard.
The business owner also expressed concern over the loss
of parking spaces that are being leased at the subject property. A property records search revealed that there
are no specific entitlements from the City which require the subject property
to provide parking for this towing business; therefore the subject site may be
re-developed to another use.
Consistency with
the General Plan
The project is consistent with the Municipal
Code and Goals, Objectives, and
Policies of the Land Use Element of the General Plan, in that it has
been designed to meet the requirement of the M1 District, which allows artist
live-work studio development and requires a maximum height of 45 feet and three
stories for buildings with approval of a Development Review Permit in order to
encourage development of artist studio housing in the City. The proposed development of 16 artist
live-work studios is consistent with Land Use Element Policy 1.9.1 for projects
in the Industrial Conservation District, which states: “Retain existing
industrial, manufacturing and arts studio uses in the Olympic Corridor between
Downtown and the Special Office District. Allow intensities of 1.5 FAR,
3-stories and 45’ by site review for artist studios only.” The project is also consistent with the goal
of “expand(ing) the opportunity
for residential land use while protecting the scale and character of existing
neighborhoods” (Land Use Objective 1.10) by “allow(ing) live/work studios for
artists in the Industrial Conservation District.”(Land Use Policy 1.10.3). Moreover, the Housing Element of the
General Plan encourages incentives for the development of housing in
non-residential zones (Policy 1.2 of Goal 1.0).
Alternative Actions:
In
addition to the recommended action, the Planning Commission could consider the
following with respect to the project:
A1.
Decline to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation
Monitoring Program.
A2.
Continue the project for specific reasons, consistent with
applicable deadlines and with agreement from the applicant.
A3.
Articulate revised findings and/or conditions to
Approve OR Deny, with or without prejudice, the subject application.
Conclusion
The
proposed 16-unit artist live-work studio condominiums project is a compatible
development for the subject property along
Prepared by: Ava M. Pecherzewski, Associate
Planner
Attachments
A.
General
Plan and Municipal Code Compliance Worksheet
B.
Draft
Statement of Official Action (includes recommended findings and/or conditions
to act upon the project)
C.
Public
Notification & Comment Material (includes notification requirements, radius
map, published notice, site posting photographs, and correspondence)
D.
Resolution
to Adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program
E.
Project
Plans and Photographs (includes aerial, neighborhood and site photographs
and/or renderings)
F. Final Initial Study /Mitigated Negative
Declaration
ATTACHMENT
A
GENERAL
PLAN AND MUNICIPAL CODE COMPLIANCE WORKSHEET
|
Project Location and Permit Processing
Time Limits |
||||
|
Project Address: |
1652 |
|||
|
Application Filing Date: |
June 9, 2005 |
|||
|
CEQA Deadline: |
An EIR was initially projected for this project,
however, during the course of analysis, it was downgraded to an MND,
therefore the project’s CEQA deadline was June 9, 2006 (without extension). An extension was granted by the applicant
which moves the CEQA deadline to September 9, 2006. |
|||
|
PSA Deadline: |
Two Months following (Mitigated) Negative Declaration
adoption, without extension. |
|||
|
Total Process Review Time (Days): |
377 Days |
|||
|
General
Plan and Municipal Code Compliance Worksheet |
||||
|
CATEGORY |
LAND USE ELEMENT |
MUNICIPAL CODE |
PROJECT |
|
|
Permitted Use |
--- |
Artist studios and art
galleries. [SMMC 9.04.08.34.020(b)] |
16-unit artist live-work
studios (condominiums) |
|
|
Dwelling Units |
--- |
No maximum in M1 Zone |
16 units |
|
|
Height of Building |
--- |
45 feet for artist studios with approval of
a Development Review Permit [SMMC 9.04.08.34.060(a)] |
45 feet from Average
Natural Grade Line of 101.17’. |
|
|
Number of Stories |
--- |
Three stories for artist
studios with approval of a Development Review Permit [SMMC 9.04.08.34.060(a)] |
Three stories (plus
mezzanine) |
|
|
F.A.R. |
|
1.5 (22,500 sq. ft.) for
artist studios with approval of a Development Review Permit [SMMC 9.04.08.34.060(b)] |
1.49 FAR (22,446 sq. ft.) |
|
|
Setbacks Frontyard Sideyard Rear Yard |
N/A N/A N/A |
Landscaping if required
by SMMC 9.04.10.04 (No landscaping required for M1 Zone). No side yard setbacks
required. No rear yard setbacks
required. [SMMC
9.04.08.34.060(d-f)] |
350 sq. ft. of
landscaping is provided in front of building. Building is setback
11’10” from front property line. Building varies on side
from 0’ setback to 11’ setback. Building varies on rear
from 0’ setback to 10’ setback. |
|
|
Mezzanine |
N/A |
Intermediate level open
to space below. May not exceed 1/3 of room floor area. [SMMC 9.04.02.030.485] |
Project plans show that
mezzanines do not exceed 1/3 of the floor area of the room below. Mezzanines
range from 258 sq. ft. to 329 sq. ft. |
|
|
Building Height Projections |
N/A |
Parapet
walls not exceeding 42” in height; Elevator
shafts and stairwells may project up to 14’ above the permitted height; Mechanical
equipment enclosures may project up to 12’ above the permitted height. [SMMC 9.01.10.02.030) |
Parapet walls do not
exceed 42” above the maximum height; Elevator shafts and
stairwells and stairwell ventilation shafts do not exceed 11.5’ above the
permitted height. No mechanical equipment
is located on the roof: Photovoltaic panels are
located within the roofline of the building and do not project above the
permitted height of the parapets. |
|
|
Building Volume Envelope |
N/A |
Any
portion of a structure between 31 to 45 feet shall provide a 9' average
setback from the street frontage: |
The
building is setback 11’10” from the front property line and provides more
than 14,00 cubic feet of setback from the street frontage between 31’ and
45’. |
|
|
Height of Walls, Fences |
N/A |
No requirement in M1 Zone
where there are no front, side or rear setbacks. |
One existing 7’ wood
fence on north side property line. New 6’ high CMU wall on
south side property line. |
|
|
Reflective Materials |
N/A |
No more than 25% of the
surface area of any façade on any new building shall contain black or
mirrored glass or other mirror-like material that is highly reflective.
Materials for roofing shall be of a non-reflective nature. |
Corrugated metal panels
will have a matte finish and will not cover more than 25% of the building. |
|
|
Private Open Space |
N/A |
Any project containing four or more residential
dwelling units shall provide the following minimum open space: one hundred
square feet per unit for projects with four or five units, and fifty square
feet per unit for projects of six units or more. [SMMC 9.04.10.02.111d] |
Private open space in
the form of private patios, decks and balconies ranging from 70 square feet
to 475 square feet is provided for each unit. |
|
|
Screening Mechanical
Equipment |
N/A |
All mechanical equipment
that extends more than 12” above the roof parapet shall be screened from view
from a horizontal plane on all sides with an impact-resistant wall. |
Mechanical equipment will
be located within the subterranean parking garage and will not be located on
the roof of the building. |
|
|
Parking Access |
Alley access is
encouraged when alley exists. |
Alley access is required
when alley exists, with exceptions per Sec. 9.04.10.08.090. |
Parking access is taken
from the Eleventh Court Alley |
|
|
Parking Space Number |
N/A |
Artist studios: ·
1 space per 750 sq. ft. of
residential area (10,180 SF) = 14 spaces;
·
1 space per 400 sq. ft. of manufacturing space (11,810 SF) = 30
spaces; ·
1 space per 300 sq. ft. of retail gallery space (No SF) = 0 spaces. Visitor Spaces: ·
1 space per 5 residential
units = 3 visitor spaces Total Required Parking = 47 spaces
|
60 parking spaces are
provided within two levels of subterranean garage, including four van-accessible
stalls. The City’s Transportation
Management Division has reviewed the parking layout and has approved the
proposed plans in concept. |
|
|
Compact Parking % |
N/A |
40% maximum = 19 spaces
permitted. |
16 compact parking spaces
are provided. |
|
|
Bicycle Parking |
N/A |
Not required for
residential buildings. For the commercial component of the building, a
minimum of 4 bicycle parking spaces must be provided. |
A bicycle parking rack of
6’ x 8’ in area is provided within the upper level of the garage, which will
hold at least four bicycles. |
|
|
Loading Spaces |
N/A |
One loading space required
for artist work area 11,810 sq. ft. Loading space must have minimum
dimensions of 10’wide x 20’ long. |
One loading space
provided with dimensions of 10’ wide x 20’ deep. |
|
|
Trash Area |
N/A |
Residential developments
containing 11 to 20 units shall provide a refuse and recycling room 129
square feet in area with 8’ high walls or an outdoor enclosure of equal area
with 6’ high walls. |
A 175 sq. ft. trash
enclosure is provided within the upper level of the parking garage. The Solid Waste Division
of EPWM has approved the proposed trash enclosure area in concept. |
|
|
Unexcavated Front or Side
Yard |
N/A |
Not applicable in the M1
Zone when the property does not abut any residential zones. |
Approximately 1’ remains
unexcavated from each side and rear property line and 3’ is unexcavated from
the front property line. |
|
|
Landscaping |
N/A |
No landscaping required
for properties in the M1 Zone. |
350 sq. ft. of
landscaping is provided in front of the building and additional landscaping
is provided in planters throughout the courtyard. |
|
|
Inclusionary Units/Fees |
Housing Element requires
Program 12 compliance. |
Multi-family
residential projects are subject to affordable housing requirements to
provide either: 2 (10%) deed
restricted, very low income affordable units on-site or 3 (20%) low-income
affordable units on-site, provide the same amount of affordable units at an
off-site location within a ¼ mile radius, acquire land for affordable
housing, or pay an in-lieu fee of $26.08 per square foot. [SMMC
9.56.040] |
The applicant has opted
to satisfy the affordable housing requirement by paying the in-lieu fee of
$26.08 per square foot of residential square-footage. Per SMMC 9.56.070, multi-family projects in
industrial zoning districts on parcels that are not developed with
multi-family housing, qualify for a 50% reduction in the affordable housing
in-lieu fee. |
|
ATTACHMENT B
DRAFT STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL
ACTION
|
|
PROJECT INFORAMTION CASE NUMBER: 05DR-008; 05DCP-003;
05TM-017; 05IS-004
LOCATION: APPLICANT: Plus
Architects Property Owner: 1639
11th Street Associates, c/o Fred Plotke CASE PLANNER: Ava M. Pecherzewski, Associate Planner REQUEST: To allow the construction of a 22,446 square-foot, three
story plus loft, 45-foot high condominium building containing 16 artists
live-work units and 60 parking spaces within two levels of subterranean
garage. CEQA STATUS: Pursuant to State California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15063, an Initial Study was conducted
and a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for this project to
provide sufficient analysis to insure compliance with CEQA. The Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (Attachment G) was circulated for a 30-day public
review period from April 10 to May 10, 2006 and no comments were received. The Initial Study/Mitigated
Negative Declaration concluded that the project would have no impact or a less
than significant impact in each of the following areas: Geology and Soils,
Shadows, Public Services, Cumulative Impacts, Hydrology and Water Quality,
Biological Resources, Air Quality, Population and Housing, Land Use and
Planning, Transportation/Traffic, Utilities and Service System, Economic and
Social Impacts, Recreation, Agricultural Resources, Energy & Mineral
Resources, Hazards and Hazardous Materials.
In
four categories, Aesthetics, Construction Effects, Cultural Resources and
Noise, impacts during the construction period were identified that are
potentially significant and require mitigation measures. These measures are included in the proposed
conditions of approval and are contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Plan
attached to the Resolution adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration. |
|
|
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
|
June 21, 2006 |
Determination Date |
|
X |
Approved based on the following findings and subject to the conditions
below. |
|
|
Denied. |
|
|
Other: |
|
EFFECTIVE
DATES OF ACTIONS IF NOT APPEALED: |
July 6, 2006 for 05DR008
and 05DCP003 July 1, 2006 for 05TM017 |
|
EXPIRATION
DATE OF ANY PERMITS GRANTED: |
July 6, 2008 for 05DR008
and 05DCP003 July 1, 2008 for 05TM017 |
|
LENGTH OF ANY
POSSIBLE EXTENSION OF EXPIRATION DATES*: |
12 months for 05DR008
and 05DCP003 Maximum three (3)
years with Planning Commission approval for Tentative Map |
* Any request for an
extension of the expiration date must be received in the City Planning Division
prior to expiration of this permit.
Each and all of the
findings and determinations are based on the competent and substantial
evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the
Project. All summaries of information
contained herein or in the findings are based on the substantial evidence in
the record. The absence of any
particular fact from any such summary is not an indication that a particular
finding is not based in part on that fact.
FINDINGS:
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FINDINGS
1. The
physical location, size, massing, and placement of proposed structures on the
site and the location of proposed uses within the project are compatible with
and relate harmoniously to surrounding sites and neighborhoods, in that the
project will be similar in height to an existing artist studio building across
the street, yet distinguishable within the M1 District given the building’s
articulation, use of upper story balconies, fenestration, and façade
embellishments. The variety in materials and shapes break up the geometry of
the building into smaller pieces which serve to break up the mass and scale. The provision of a central open courtyard and
upper-level stepbacks, open space, and pedestrian-oriented design features such
as ground-floor windows and pedestrian street access, upper-story balconies and
decks and landscaping between the front façade and the street will ensure
adequate light, air, and privacy for the residents. These design considerations and materials
create an overall impression of the structure that is in character with the
light industrial neighborhood, even though it will function, in part, as a
residential use. Moreover, special conditions have been added to address
transitions between the proposed residential development and the adjacent
automobile tow yard use which has been in operation and served this
neighborhood for several years.
2. The rights-of-way can accommodate autos
and pedestrians, including parking and access, in that the garage is accessed
from
3. The health and safety services (police,
fire, etc.) and public infrastructure (e.g. utilities) are sufficient to
accommodate the new development, in that that the proposed development
is located within an urbanized area that is already adequately served by
existing City infrastructure. As determined in the Initial Study/Mitigated
Negative Declaration, no new safety services or public infrastructure will be
required by this project.
4. Any on-site provision of housing or
parks and public open space, which are part of the required project mitigation
measures required in Part 9.04.10.12 (Project Mitigation Measures) of the City
of Santa Monica Comprehensive Land Use and Zoning Ordinance, satisfactorily
meet the goals of the mitigation program, in that there are no requirements
in that Code section that are applicable to this project.
5. The project is generally consistent
with the Municipal Code and General Plan, in that it has been designed to meet
the requirement of the M1 District, which allows artist live-work studio
development and requires a maximum height of 45 feet and three stories for
buildings with approval of a Development Review Permit in order to encourage
development of artist studio housing in the City. The Housing Element of the General Plan encourages
incentives for the development of housing in non-residential zones (Policy 1.2
of Goal 1.0). Moreover, the proposed provision of 16 artist
live-work studios is consistent with Land Use Element Policy 1.9.1 for projects
in the Industrial Conservation District, which states: “Retain existing
industrial, manufacturing and arts studio uses in the Olympic Corridor between
Downtown and the Special Office District. Allow intensities of 1.5 FAR,
3-stories and 45’ by site review for artist studios only.”
6. Reasonable mitigation measures have
been included for all adverse impacts identified in the Initial Study and
Mitigated Negative Declaration, in that the Initial Study for the project found
that the project would have potentially significant adverse impacts only in the
construction phase, and mitigation measures that were identified to reduce
impacts to a level that is considered less than significant have been
incorporated into the project’s conditions of approval.
TENTATIVE PACEL / TRACT MAP FINDINGS
1.
The
proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans as
specified in Government Code Section 65451. Specifically, while the subject
property is not located in an area governed by a specific plan as specified in
Government Code Section 65451, compliance with the City’s General Plan is
required. For the purpose of subdividing the subject parcel, there are two
pertinent policies that must be evaluated with the map; those policies relate
to building height and unit density. As noted and shown on the subject map, the
project complies with applicable policies, including unit density and height
standards for the subject land use designation.
2.
The
design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable
general and specific plans. Specifically, while the subject property is not
located in an area governed by a specific plan, compliance with the City’s
General Plan is required. As noted and shown on the subject map, the proposed
improvements will not exceed land use designation limits to building height and
unit density.
3.
The
site is physically suitable for the type of development. Specifically, the
subject parcel is a standard-sized parcel located within an urbanized area
adequately served by existing roadways and infrastructure. The property is
physically able to accommodate the proposed development.
4.
The
site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.
Specifically, the subject parcel is a standard-sized parcel located within an
urbanized area adequately served by existing roadways and infrastructure.
Moreover the type of development and unit density is consistent with policies
set forth in the City’s General Plan and other improvements in the general
vicinity.
5.
The
design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or
wildlife or their habitat, in that the proposed subdivision is located in an
urbanized area that does not contain habitats or would otherwise injure fish
and wildlife.
6.
The
design of the subdivision or the type of improvement is not likely to cause
serious public health problems. The proposed subdivision is for a property
located in an urbanized area and is consistent with other similar improvements
in the area. As noted and shown on the map, the project complies with height
and unit density limitations set forth in the General Plan. The subdivision of
the parcel does not have the potential to disrupt the urban environment or
otherwise cause serious public health problems.
7.
The
design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of,
property within the proposed subdivision in that there are no public easements
located within the proposed subdivision.
8.
The
proposed subdivision is consistent with any ordinance or law of the City of
DESIGN
COMPATIBILITY PERMIT FINDINGS
1. The physical location, size, massing and
placement of proposed structures on the site and the location of proposed
amenities within the project are compatible with and relate harmoniously to
surrounding sites and neighborhoods in that the project will be similar in
height to an existing artist studio building across the street, yet be
distinguishable within the M1 District given the building’s articulation, use
of upper story balconies, fenestration, and façade embellishments. The variety
in materials and shapes break up the geometry of the building into smaller
pieces which serve to break up the mass and scale. The provision of a central open courtyard and
upper-level stepbacks, open space, and pedestrian-oriented design features such
as ground-floor windows and pedestrian street access, upper-story balconies and
decks and landscaping between the front façade and the street will ensure
adequate light, air, and privacy for the residents. These design considerations and materials
create an overall impression of the structure that is in character with the
light industrial neighborhood, even though it will function, in part, as a
residential use.
2. The physical location, size, massing and placement of proposed
structures on the site, and parking access and the location of proposed
amenities within the project would not be detrimental to the public interest,
health, safety, convenience or general welfare in that the provision of a
central open courtyard and upper-level stepbacks, open space, and pedestrian-oriented
design features such as ground-floor windows and pedestrian street access,
upper-story balconies and decks and landscaping between the front façade and
the street will ensure adequate light, air, and privacy for the residents. Analysis
of potential shadows from the building found that they would not significantly
impact the adjacent commercial uses due to the project’s adjacency to
undeveloped, paved parking lots on each side. Moreover, special conditions have been added
to address transitions between the proposed residential development and the
adjacent automobile repair land use which has been in operation and served this
neighborhood for several years.
3. The rights-of-way can accommodate autos
and pedestrians, including adequate parking and access, in that that the garage
is accessed from Eleventh Court alley, which is accessible from Olympic
Boulevard, a wide commercial street and will meet all requirements of the
Transportation Management Division.
Furthermore, sidewalks along both
4. The health and safety services (police,
fire etc.) and public infrastructure (e.g., utilities) is sufficient to
accommodate the new development, in that the proposed development is located
within an urbanized area that is already adequately served by existing City
infrastructure. As determined in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative
Declaration, no new safety services or public infrastructure will be required
by this project.
5. Reasonable mitigation measures have been
included for all adverse impacts identified in an Initial Study in that the
Initial Study for the project found that the project would have potentially
significant adverse impacts only in the construction phase, and mitigation
measures that were identified to reduce impacts to a level that is considered
less than significant have been incorporated into the project’s conditions of
approval.
6. The proposed use conforms precisely to
the minimum requirements outlined in Section 9.04.16, Subchapter
9.04.16.01.030, in that the proposed project, as conditioned below, and shown
on the plans submitted by the applicant, demonstrates compliance with all
applicable provisions of the City of Santa Monica Zoning Ordinance.
CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL:
PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Special Project Conditions
1. Prior to issuance of building permits, Condominium Association By-Laws and a Declaration of CC&R’s shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. The The CC&R's shall contain a non-discrimination clause as presented in SMMC Section 9.20.20.020 and such provisions as are required by SMMC Section 9.04.16.01.030(d) and (e). The CC&R’s shall also contain a clause which limits the use and occupancy of the dwellings to artist live-work spaces.
2. Prior
to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit, for City
review and approval, a deed restriction or other legal instrument setting forth
the artist live-work use requirements for the project. Such restrictions shall be effective for the
life of the project.
3. A
minimum of 50 percent of the floor area of each individual artist studio unit
shall be utilized for work space.
Administrative
4. The Planning Commission’s approval, conditions of approval, or denial of this application may be appealed to the City Council if the appeal is filed with the Zoning Administrator within fourteen consecutive days following the date of the Planning Commission’s determination in the manner provided in Part 9.04.20.24, Sections 9.04.20.24.010 through 9.04.20.24.040. (An appeal of the approval conditions of approval, or denial of a subdivision map must be filed with the City Clerk within ten consecutive days following the date of Planning Commission determination in the manner provided in Part 9.20.14, Section 9.20.14.070.) Any appeal must be made in the form required by the Zoning Administrator. The approval of this permit shall expire if the rights granted are not exercised within two years from the permit’s effective date. Exercise of rights shall mean issuance of a building permit to commence construction. However, the permit shall also expire if the building permit expires, if final inspection is not completed or a Certificate of Occupancy is not issued within the time periods specified in SMMC Section 8.08.060. One twelve-month extension may be permitted for the Design Compatibility Permit and Development Review Permit if approved by the Director of Planning. Applicant is on notice that time extensions shall not be granted if development standards or the development process relevant to the project have changed since project approval. The Tentative Map may be extended for a period of three years with Planning Commission approval.
5. Within ten days of City Planning Division transmittal of the Statement of Official Action, project applicant shall sign and return a copy of the Statement of Official Action prepared by the Planning Division, agreeing to the conditions of approval and acknowledging that failure to comply with such conditions shall constitute grounds for potential revocation of the permit approval. By signing same, applicant shall not thereby waive any legal rights applicant may possess regarding said conditions. The signed Statement shall be returned to the Planning Division. Failure to comply with this condition shall constitute grounds for potential permit revocation.
6. The tentative map shall expire 24 months after approval, except as provided
in the provisions of California Government Code Section 66452.6 and Subchapter
9.20.18 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code.
During this time period the final map shall be presented to the City of
7. Within thirty (30) days after final approval of the project, a sign shall be posted on site stating the date and nature of the approval. The sign shall be posted in accordance with the Zoning Administrator guidelines and shall remain in place until a building permit is issued for the project. The sign shall be removed promptly when a building permit is issued for the project or upon expiration of the Design Compatibility Permit.
8. In
the event permittee violates or fails to comply with any conditions of
approval of this permit, no further permits, licenses, approvals or
certificates of occupancy shall be issued until such violation has been fully
remedied.
Conformance with Approved Plans
9. This approval is for those plans dated June 08, 2005, a copy of which shall be maintained in the files of the City Planning Division. Project development shall be consistent with such plans, except as otherwise specified in these conditions of approval.
10. Minor amendments to the plans shall be subject to approval by the Director of Planning. A significant change in the approved concept shall be subject to Planning Commission Review. Construction shall be in conformance with the plans submitted or as modified by the Planning Commission, Architectural Review Board or Director of Planning.
11. The plans shall comply with all other
provisions of Article IX of the Municipal Code, (Zoning Ordinance) and all
other pertinent ordinances and General Plan policies of the City of
Fees
12. A Park and Recreation Facilities Tax of $200.00 per residential unit shall be due and payable at the time of issuance of a building permit for the construction or placement of the residential units on the subject lot, per and subject to the provisions of Section 6.80.010 et seq. of the Santa Monica Municipal Code.
13. Pursuant to Santa Monica Municipal Code (SMMC) Chapter 9.56, the project is subject to the City's Affordable Housing Production Program which requires a 16-unit development to provide at least two very low income affordable units or three low income affordable units or 16 moderate income affordable units on-site (SMMC Section 9.56.050), provide the affordable units off-site (SMMC Section 9.56.060), pay an affordable housing fee (SMMC Section 9.56.070), or acquire land for affordable housing (SMMC Section 9.56.080).
The developer has elected to satisfy the City’s
Affordable Housing Production requirement through payment of the applicable
affordable housing fee which is calculated based on the project’s floor
area as defined by SMMC Section 9.04.02.030.315. The fee will be calculated prior to payment based on the requirements
of the Affordable Housing Production Program.
The fee must be paid in full prior to the City granting any approval for
the occupancy of the project.
14. Prior
to issuance of a condominium license, the developer shall provide for the
payment of a Condominium Tax of $1,000 per planned salable unit pursuant to
Chapter 6.76 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code.
Mitigation Monitoring Program
15. Pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, the City Planning Division will coordinate a monitoring and reporting program regarding any required changes to the project made in conjunction with project approval and any conditions of approval, including those conditions intended to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. This program shall include, but is not limited to, ensuring that the City Planning Division itself and other City divisions and departments such as the Building and Safety Division, the Department of Environmental and Public Works, the Fire Department, the Police Department, the Planning and Community Development Department and the Finance Department are aware of project requirements which must be satisfied prior to issuance of a Building Permit, Certificate of Occupancy, or other permit, and that other responsible agencies are also informed of conditions relating to their responsibilities. Project owner shall demonstrate compliance with conditions of approval in a written report submitted to the Planning Director and Building Officer prior to issuance of a Building Permit or Certificate of Occupancy, and, as applicable, provide periodic reports regarding compliance with such conditions.
Cultural Resources
16. If any archaeological remains are uncovered during excavation or construction, work in the affected area shall be suspended and a recognized specialist shall be contacted to conduct a survey of the affected area at project's owner's expense. A determination shall then be made by the Director of Planning to determine the significance of the survey findings and appropriate actions and requirements, if any, to address such findings.
Final Design
17. Plans for final design, landscaping, screening, trash enclosures, and signage shall be subject to review and approval by the Architectural Review Board.
18. The Architectural Review Board, in its review, shall pay particular attention to the project's pedestrian orientation and amenities; scale and articulation of design elements; exterior colors, textures and materials; window treatment; glazing; and landscaping. Also, the Architectural Review Board should give careful consideration of the building’s entry area.
19. All materials used for exterior building surfaces shall be of low reflectivity finish. Paint used for exterior facades shall be of low reflectivity. Metal surfaces shall be brush-polished and not highly reflective.
20. Landscaping plans shall comply with Subchapter 9.04.10.04 (Landscaping Standards) of the Zoning Ordinance including use of water-conserving landscaping materials, landscape maintenance and other standards contained in the Subchapter.
21. Refuse areas, storage areas and mechanical equipment shall be screened in accordance with SMMC Section 9.04.10.02.130, 140, and 150. Refuse areas shall be of a size adequate to meet on-site need, including recycling. The Architectural Review Board in its review shall pay particular attention to the screening of such areas and equipment. Any rooftop mechanical equipment shall be minimized in height and area, and shall be located in such a way as to minimize noise and visual impacts to surrounding properties. Unless otherwise approved by the Architectural Review Board, rooftop mechanical equipment shall be located at least five feet from the edge of the roof. Except for solar hot water heaters, no residential water heaters shall be located on the roof.
22. No gas or electric meters shall be located within the required front or street side yard setback areas. The Architectural Review Board in its review shall pay particular attention to the location and screening of such meters.
23. Prior to consideration of the project by the Architectural Review Board, the applicant shall review disabled access requirements with the Building and Safety Division and make any necessary changes in the project design to achieve compliance with such requirements. The Architectural Review Board, in its review, shall pay particular attention to the aesthetic, landscaping, and setback impacts of any ramps or other features necessitated by accessibility requirements.
24. As appropriate, the Architectural Review Board shall require the use of anti-graffiti materials on surfaces likely to attract graffiti.
Construction Plan Requirements
25. Final
building plans submitted for approval of a building permit shall include
on the plans a list of all permanent mechanical equipment to be placed indoors
which may be heard outdoors.
26. The
units on the north side of the building, on all levels, shall use dual-paned
windows to reduce noise impacts associated with the adjacent towing yard
use.
Construction Period
27. During
construction, a security fence, the height of which shall be the maximum
permitted by the Zoning Ordinance, shall be maintained around the perimeter of
the lot. The lot shall be kept clear of
all trash, weeds, etc.
28. Vehicle
hauling dirt or other construction debris from the site shall cover any
open load with a tarpaulin or other secure covering to minimize dust
emissions. Immediately after commencing
dirt removal from the site, the general contractor shall provide the City of
29. Developer
shall prepare a notice, subject to the review by the Director of
Planning and Community Development, that lists all construction mitigation
requirements, permitted hours of construction, and identifies a contact person
at City Hall as well as the developer who will respond to complaints related to
the proposed construction. The notice
shall be mailed to property owners and residents within a 200-foot radius from
the subject site at least five (5) days prior to the start of construction.
30. A
sign shall be posted on the property in a manner consistent with the
public hearing sign requirements which shall identify the address and phone
number of the owner and/or applicant for the purposes of responding to
questions and complaints during the construction period. Said sign shall also indicate the hours of
permissible construction work.
31. A copy of these conditions shall be posted in an easily visible and accessible location at all times during construction at the project site. The pages shall be laminated or otherwise protected to ensure durability of the copy.
32. All diesel equipment shall be operated with closed engine doors and shall be equipped with factory-recommended mufflers.
33. Electrical power shall be used to run air compressors and similar power tools.
34. Excavation, foundation-laying, and conditioning activities (the noisiest phase of construction) shall be restricted to between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, in accordance with Section 4.12.110(d) of the Santa Monica Municipal Code as it would apply to residential zones.
35. For
all noise-generating construction activity on the project site, additional
noise attenuation techniques shall be employed to reduce noise levels to City
of
Standard Conditions
36. Lofts or mezzanines shall not exceed 33.3% of the room below unless compliance with the district's limits on number of stories can be maintained. Lofts or mezzanines located in studio units shall not exceed 99 square feet unless parking in compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements is provided.
37. Mechanical equipment shall not be located on the side of any building which is adjacent to a residential building on the adjoining lot. Roof locations may be used when the mechanical equipment is installed within a sound-rated parapet enclosure.
38. Final approval of any mechanical equipment installation will require a noise test in compliance with SMMC Section 4.12.040. Equipment for the test shall be provided by the owner or contractor and the test shall be conducted by the owner or contractor. A copy of the noise test results on mechanical equipment shall be submitted to the Community Noise Officer for review to ensure that noise levels do not exceed maximum allowable levels for the applicable noise zone.
39. Final parking lot layout and specifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the Transportation Management Division.
40. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a copy of the recorded map shall be provided to the City Planning Division.
41. Prior
to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate
compliance with Subchapter 9.04.16 Condominiums, including the provisions of
Ordinance No. 2131 (CCS).
42. Construction period signage shall be subject to the approval of the Architectural Review Board.
43. The property owner shall insure any graffiti on the site is promptly removed through compliance with the City’s graffiti removal program.
44. The
operation shall at all times be conducted in a manner not detrimental to
surrounding properties or residents by reason of lights, noise, activities,
parking or other actions.
ENVIRONMENTAL PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT (EPWM)
Drainage
45. To mitigate storm water and surface runoff from the project site, an Urban Runoff Mitigation Plan may be required by the Department of Environmental and Public Works Management (EPWM) pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 7.10. Prior to submittal of landscape plans for Architectural Review Board approval, the applicant shall contact EPWM to determine applicable requirements, which include the following:
·
Non-stormwater
runoff, sediment and construction waste from the construction site and parking
areas is prohibited from leaving the site;
·
An
sediments or materials which are tracked off-site must be removed the same day
they are tracked off-site;
·
Excavated
soil must be located on the site and soil piles should be covered and otherwise
protected so that sediments do not go into the street or adjoining properties;
·
Washing
of construction or other vehicles shall be allowed adjacent to a construction
site. No runoff from washing vehicles on
a construction site shall be allowed to leave the site;
·
Drainage
controls may be required depending on the extent of grading and topography of
the site; and
·
New development
is required to reduce projected runoff pollution by at least twenty percent
through incorporation of design elements or principles, such as increasing
permeable surfaces, diverting or catching runoff via swales, berms, and the
like; orientation of drain gutters towards permeable areas; modification of
grades; use of retention structures and other methods.
Streets
46. Unless
otherwise approved by the Department of Environmental and Public Works
Management, all sidewalks shall be kept clear and passable during the grading
and construction phase of the project.
47. Sidewalks,
curbs, gutters, paving and driveways which need replacing or removal as
a result of the project as determined by the Department of Environmental and
Public Works Management shall be reconstructed to the satisfaction of the
Department of Environmental and Public Works Management. Approval for this work shall be obtained from
the Department of Environmental and Public Works Management prior to issuance
of the building permits.
48. Street
and/or alley lighting shall be provided on public rights of way adjacent
to the project if and as needed per the specifications and with the approval of
the Department of Environmental and Public Works.
Off-site
49. All
off site improvements required by the City Engineer shall be installed. Plans and specifications for off site
improvements shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and approved by
the City Engineer.
50. A
subdivision improvement agreement for all off site improvements required by the
City Engineer shall be prepared and a performance bond posted through the City
Attorney's office.
Environmental Mitigation
51. To
mitigate solid waste impacts, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy,
project owner shall submit a recycling plan to the Department of Environmental
and Public Works Management for its approval.
The recycling plan shall include:
1) List of materials such as white paper, computer paper, metal
cans, and glass to be recycled;
2) Location
of recycling bins;
3) Designated
recycling coordinator;
4) Nature
and extent of internal and external pick-up service;
5) Pick-up
schedule; and
6) Plan
to inform tenants/ occupants of service.
52. Ultra-low
flow plumbing fixtures are required on all new development and
remodeling where plumbing is to be added.
(Maximum 1.6 gallon toilets and 1.0 gallon urinals and low flow shower
head.)
Construction Period Mitigation
53. A
construction period mitigation plan shall be prepared by the applicant
for approval by the Department of Environmental and Public Works Management
prior to issuance of a building permit.
The approved mitigation plan shall be posted on the site for the
duration of the project construction and shall be produced upon request. As applicable, this plan shall:
1) Specify the names, addresses, telephone numbers and business license numbers of all contractors and subcontractors as well as the developer and architect;
2) Describe how demolition of any existing structures is to be accomplished; 3) Indicate where any cranes are to be located for erection/construction;
4) Describe how much of the public street, alleyway, or sidewalk is proposed to be used in conjunction with construction;
5) Set forth the extent and nature of any pile-driving operations;
6) Describe the length and number of any tiebacks which must extend under the property of other persons;
7) Specify the nature and extent of any dewatering and its effect on any adjacent buildings;
8) Describe anticipated construction-related truck routes, number of truck trips, hours of hauling and parking location;
9) Specify the nature and extent of any helicopter hauling;
10) State whether any construction activity beyond normally permitted hours is proposed;
11) Describe any proposed construction noise mitigation measures;
12) Describe construction-period security measures including any fencing, lighting, and security personnel;
13) Provide a drainage plan;
14) Provide a construction-period parking plan which shall minimize use of public streets for parking;
15) List a designated on-site construction manager;
16) Provide a construction materials recycling plan which seeks to
maximize the reuse/recycling of construction waste;
17) Provide a plan regarding use of recycled and
low-environmental-impact materials in building construction; and
18) Provide
a construction period water runoff control plan.
Final Map Requirements
54. In
submitting required materials to the Santa Monica Engineering Division for a
final map, applicant shall provide a copy of the approved Statement of Official
Action.
55. The
form, contents, accompanying data, and filing of the final subdivision map
shall conform to the provisions of SMMC Sections 9.20.12.010 through
9.20.08.090 and the Subdivision Map Act.
The required Final Map filing fee shall be paid prior to scheduling of
the Final Map for City Council approval.
56. One
mylar and one blue-line copy of the final map shall be provided to and recorded
with the Los Angeles County Recorder prior to issuance of any building permit
for a condominium project pursuant to Government Code Section 66499.30.
Applicant shall also provide the County with a copy of this Statement of
Official Action at the time the required copies of the map are submitted.
57. Prior
to approval of the Final Map, the requirements of Santa Monica Municipal Code
Section 9.04.10.16.010 (d) shall have been met.
OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT
58. Street
trees shall be maintained, relocated or provided as required in a manner
consistent with the City's Community Forest Management Plan 2000, per the
specifications of the Open Space Management Division of the Community and
Cultural Service Department and the City’s Tree Code (SMMC Chapter 7.40).
FIRE
VOTE
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
NOTICE
If this is a final decision not subject to further appeal
under the City of
I hereby
certify that this Statement of Official Action accurately reflects the final
determination of the Planning Commission of the City of
_____________________________ _____________________________
Jay P. Johnson, Chairperson Date
Gwynne Pugh, Vice Chairperson
Acknowledgement by Permit Holder
I
hereby agree to the above conditions of approval and acknowledge that failure
to comply with such conditions shall constitute grounds for potential
revocation of the permit approval.
|
Print Name and Title |
|
|
|
Applicant’s Signature |
|
|
ATTACHMENT C
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
INFORMATION
Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 9.04.20.20.080 and in accordance with
the posting requirements set forth by the Zoning Administrator, prior to
application filing the applicant posted a sign on the property regarding the
subject application. At least 8 weeks
prior to the public hearing date, the applicant submitted a photograph to
verify the site posting and to demonstrate that the sign provides the following
information: Project case number, brief
project description, name and telephone number of applicant, site address,
date, time and location of public hearing, and the City Planning Division phone
number. It is the applicant's
responsibility to update the hearing date if it is changed after posting.
In addition, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 9.04.20.22.050, notice
of the public hearing was mailed to all owners and residential and commercial
tenants of property located within a 500 foot radius of the project and
published in the “
On April 5, 2006, the applicant was notified by phone and in writing of
the subject hearing date.
|
The applicant provided the
following information regarding attempts to contact area property owners,
residents, and recognized neighborhood associations: |
|
|
Adjacent Neighbors |
Presented the project to the adjacent residents of the artist studios
across the street at |
|
Community Meetings |
No information provided. |
|
Neighborhood Group: Pico Neighborhood Association |
Contacted group representative and scheduled meeting. |
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC
HEARING
BEFORE THE
SUBJECT: Development
Review Permit 05DR-008; Design Compatibility Permit 05DCP-003; Vesting
Tentative Tract Map 05TM-017; Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 05IS-004
1652
APPLICANT: Plus Architects
PROPERTY OWNER: 1639 11th Street Associates, c/o Fred
Plotke
A public hearing will be held by the Planning
Commission to consider the following request:
An application for a Development Review Permit,
Design Compatibility Permit and Vesting Tentative Tract Map, and adoption of an
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the construction of a 22,446
square-foot, three-story plus loft, 45’-high, 16-unit artist live-work condominium
building with two levels of subterranean parking containing 60 spaces.
Pursuant to SMMC Section 9.04.08.34.060, a
Development Review Permit is required for artist studio buildings of three
stories and 45-feet in the M1 (Industrial Conservation) District. Pursuant to SMMC Section 9.04.20.15, a Design
Compatibility Permit is required for condominium buildings, and pursuant to
SMMC Section 9.20.06, a Tentative Subdivision Map is required to subdivide the
parcel into 16 condominium units.
DATE/TIME: WEDNESDAY,
June 21, 2006, AT 7:00 p.m.
LOCATION: City
Council Chambers, Second Floor
HOW TO COMMENT
The City of
Address your letters to: Ava
M. Pecherzewski, Associate Planner
Re:
05DR-008
City
Planning Division
MORE INFORMATION
If you want more information about this project or
wish to review the project file, please contact Ava Pecherzewski at (310) 458-8341, or by e-mail at
ava.pecherzewski@smgov.net. The Zoning Ordinance is available at the Planning
Counter during business hours and on the City’s web site at www.santa-monica.org.
The meeting facility is wheelchair accessible. For
disability-related accommodations, please contact (310) 458-8341 or (310)
458-8696 TTY at least 72 hours in advance. All written materials are available
in alternate format upon request. Santa Monica Big Blue Bus Lines numbered 1,
2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, and 10 serve City Hall.
Pursuant to California Government Code Section
65009(b), if this matter is subsequently challenged in Court, the challenge may
be limited to only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of
ESPAÑOL
Esto es una noticia de una audiencia pública para
revisar applicaciónes proponiendo desarrollo en
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________
Amanda Schachter
Planning Manager