Planning Commission Meeting: June 21, 2006

Agenda Item: _9-B

To:                   Planning Commission

From:              Amanda Schachter, City Planning Division Manager

Subject:          Applications Development Review 05-008; Design Compatibiliy Permit 05-003; Tract Map 05-017; Initial Study 05-004 to allow the construction of a 22,446 square-foot, three story plus loft, 45-foot high condominium building containing 16 artist live-work units and 60 parking spaces within two levels of subterranean garage. 

 

Address:        1652 Twelfth Street

Applicant:       Plus Architects

 

Recommended Action

It is recommended that the Planning Commission take the following actions subject to findings and conditions contained in Attachment B:

1.                  Adopt the Resolution adopting the attached Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program for  project-related environmental impacts;

2.                  Approve applications 05DR-008; 05DCP-003; 05TM-017.

 

Executive Summary

The applicant, Plus Architects, proposes to construct a new 22,446 square-foot,  three-story plus loft, 45-foot high condominium building to establish 16 new market rate artist live-work condominium units in the Industrial Conservation (M1) District.  The subject property is an entirely paved, relatively flat rectangular site of 15,000 square feet in area.    

 

The following issues should be considered by the Planning Commission in its review of the proposed project and are addressed in this report:

·                    Do the proposed mitigation measures reduce the potential significant impacts to less than significant levels?  

·                    Is the proposed location, size, massing, and placement of the proposed structure on the site, and the use of the project, compatible with and relate harmoniously to the surrounding properties and neighborhood?

·                    Is the project and subdivision generally consistent with the Municipal Code and General Plan?

 


Project / Site Information

The following table provides a brief summary of the project location. Additional information regarding the project’s compliance with applicable municipal regulations and the General Plan is available in Attachment A.

 

Project and Site Information Table

Zoning District:

M1

 

Site Location Map

Land Use
Element Designation:

Industrial

Parcel Area (SF):

15,000 SF

Parcel Dimensions:

100’ W x 150’ D

Existing On-Site Improvements (Year Built):

Vacant, paved parcel

Rent Control Status:

Commercial exempt

Adjacent Zoning Districts and Land Uses:

Property surrounded on all sides by commercial and industrial businesses in the M1 Zone.

 

The project site is located mid-block on the west side of Twelfth Street between Colorado Avenue and Olympic Boulevard.  The street is a cul-de-sac with access to the site only available from westbound Olympic Boulevard (a median on Olympic Boulevard prevents eastbound traffic from making a left-turn onto the street). 

 

The subject property does not contain any structures and consists of a flat, paved parking area that currently houses vehicles from the adjacent tow truck business north of the parcel.  There are no special entitlements or encumberances on the property that require it to provide parking for any adjacent properties.  The site is located within an industrial neighborhood of mostly one-story commercial and industrial buildings. However, two-story buildings are situated on both corners of Twelfth Street at Olympic Boulevard, and a four-story artist loft building is located directly across the street from the subject property.  An automobile towing, storage and lien sales lot is located on the neighboring property directly south of the site.

 

The project involves the construction of a three-story plus loft, 45-foot tall, condominium building containing 16 artist live-work units and 60 parking spaces within two levels of subterranean garage.  The Zoning Ordinance defines an artist studio as “a building or portion of a building used as a place of work by an artist”, where living quarters for the artist may be permitted, provided the living space does not exceed 50 percent of the square footage of the total studio space.  Exhibition space and performance space is specifically prohibited.  The Zoning Ordinance does not provide a definition for an “artist”. 

 

Artist live-work studios are permitted in the M1 District, which allows for additional building height of three stories and 45 feet rather than two stories and 30 feet, and a floor-area-ratio of 1.5 rather than 1.0, with approval of a Development Review Permit.  The total building area would be approximately 22,446 square feet (1.49 FAR).  The building is designed with a central courtyard in a horseshoe configuration open to Twelfth Street.  The architectural design is modern/contemporary, and includes materials such as corrugated metal to reflect the industrial surroundings.  Photovoltaic panels approximately two-feet wide would be mounted at intervals around the inside edge of the roof to provide supplemental electrical power.  Each studio contains two levels, while the third-floor units are designed with second-level mezzanines within the third-floor elevation.  Units would range from roughly 1,100 square-feet to 1,600 square-feet in size, and just over 50% of each unit would be designed as work space, as required by Code.  In all cases, the floor plan is open and does not make a distinction between the studio space and the residential component of each unit. This will allow for maximum flexibility in the use of the space by artists.  Condition #3 has been added to require that a minimum of 50 percent of the floor area of each individual unit will be devoted to artist work space.  Additionally, each unit contains private open space in the form of patios, decks and balconies ranging from 70 square-feet to 475 square-feet.

 

Although landscaping is not required in the M1 District, the project provides 350 square-feet of landscaping in the front yard area adjacent to the public right-of-way on Sixteenth Street.  Two levels of subterranean parking would provide 40 standard parking spaces, 16 compact spaces, and four wheelchair-accessible spaces for a total of 60 parking spaces.  The 16 artist lofts will require 47 of these parking spaces.  The new parking structure will be accessed from Eleventh Court Alley.   

 

Environmental Analysis

 

Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15063, an Initial Study was conducted and a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for this project.  The Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (Attachment F) was circulated for a 30-day public review period from April 10 to May 10, 2006 and no comments were received.  The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration concluded that the project would have no impact or a less than significant impact in each of the following areas: Geology and Soils, Shadows, Public Services, Cumulative Impacts, Hydrology and Water Quality, Biological Resources, Air Quality, Population and Housing, Land Use and Planning, Transportation/Traffic, Utilities and Service System, Economic and Social Impacts, Recreation, Agricultural Resources, Energy & Mineral Resources, Hazards and Hazardous Materials. 

 

In four categories, Aesthetics, Construction, Cultural Resources and Noise, impacts during the construction period were identified that are potentially significant and require mitigation measures.  These measures are included in the proposed conditions of approval (Conditions #15, 16, 19, 29, 30, 32-35, and 53) and are contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Plan attached to the Resolution adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration (Attachment F).

 

A traffic analysis was conducted for the project, examining capacity and operations at two intersections in the vicinity of the project and on 12th Street between Colorado Avenue and Olympic Boulevard.  The proposed project is expected to generate a net increase of 94 new daily trips, including 7 new trips during the AM peak hour and 8 new trips during the PM peak hour.  Based on the City’s significance criteria, the project would not result in any significant traffic impacts, and therefore no mitigation measures have been required.

 

The proposed condominium buildings would cast shadows onto adjacent properties, particularly in the wintertime when shadows are most extreme.  However, shadows cast by the proposed project would be cast on areas that either: a.: are not considered light-sensitive; or b.) are shadowed for less time than established by the City’s significance threshold (a three-hour period between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. at the Winter Solstice).  Therefore, shadows are considered less than significant and mitigation measures are not required.

 

Project Analysis

 

Neighborhood Compatibility

 

The project is located in a neighborhood that is undergoing transition.  While the block is still comprised mostly of one and two-story commercial and industrial businesses, a four-story artist studio building was constructed across the street at 1643 12th Street in 1990.  Because artist studios are encouraged in the industrial zones, and are permitted a three-story and 45-foot height limit through a Development Review Permit, more parcels on this block could be redeveloped in the future with similar developments. 

 

The proposed project is of similar height, mass and scale as the existing artist studio across the street. In general, the project’s design appears to integrate well into this eclectic industrial neighborhood.  The project is contemporary in design and will be distinguishable within the M1 District given the building’s articulation, use of upper story balconies, fenestration, and façade embellishments. The variety in materials and shapes break up the geometry of the building into smaller pieces which serve to break up the mass.  This is in contrast with the typical industrial design that is strictly functional and unembellished. However, the overall design is respectful of its location within an industrial district by incorporating certain design elements that are typical of industrial buildings.  These include a façade treatment that will consist of a combination of corrugated metal panels and smooth stucco as well as a metal catwalk and elevator in the central courtyard; industrial-like window style and scale; a linear symmetry and boxiness of design; and, a low profile, horizontal mass and scale that is consistent with industrial building design.  These design considerations and materials create an overall impression of the structure that is in character with the light industrial neighborhood, even though it will function, in part, as a residential use.

 

The provision of a central open courtyard and upper-level stepbacks, open space, and pedestrian-oriented design features such as ground-floor windows and pedestrian street access, upper-story balconies and decks and landscaping between the front façade and the street will ensure adequate light, air, and privacy for the residents. Analysis of potential shadows from the building found that they would not significantly impact the adjacent commercial uses due to the project’s adjacency to an undeveloped, paved parking lot on the north side.  Although landscaping is not required in the M1 District, the project provides 350 square-feet of landscaping in the front yard area adjacent to the public right-of-way on Sixteenth Street. The design of the proposed project does not negatively impact on the use of the adjacent commercial properties, as the building’s articulation and setbacks on the upper floors serve to break the massing and scale of the building.  Moreover, another building of comparable size and mass, a four-story artist live-work building, has existed across the street from the subject property since 1990.   

  

Staff recommends that further attention be provided to one component of the project design.  The entry area appears to be overly ornamental; however, staff believes this issue can be resolved through the Architectural Review Board process and in no way compromises the project’s neighborhood compatibility.  Condition #18 addresses this issue.   

           

            Neighbor Concern

 

            Staff received one piece of written correspondence in November of 2005 from the business owner of the adjacent property to the north at 1654 Twelfth Street (Tip Top Tow Service).  This individual expressed concern regarding compatibility of the proposed project with his business operation which is a 24-hour towing service which has been in operation for several years.  Specifically, the issues of noise and fumes were raised due to the nature of the business, including noise from transporter trucks delivering vehicles during the night, noise from car alarms potentially going off, and potential fumes from the diesel transport trucks and associated towing equipment. 

 

            This business is subject to the limitations of the City’s Noise Ordinance (SMMC 4.12.110), which limits the decibel level in an industrial zone, on a 24-hour basis, to 70 decibels within any 15-minute interval.  Residents of the proposed project have the ability to contact the Santa Monica Police Department if violations of the Noise Ordinance occur.  Moreover, air quality violations relative to fumes emanating from the tow trucks can be reported to the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD).  Staff has incorporated a Condition of Approval (Condition #26) which requires the developer to install dual-paned windows on the north side of the building in order to address the potential adverse noise impacts from the adjacent automobile tow-yard.  

 

            The business owner also expressed concern over the loss of parking spaces that are being leased at the subject property.  A property records search revealed that there are no specific entitlements from the City which require the subject property to provide parking for this towing business; therefore the subject site may be re-developed to another use.   

 

Consistency with the General Plan

 

The project is consistent with the Municipal Code and Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Land Use Element of the General Plan, in that it has been designed to meet the requirement of the M1 District, which allows artist live-work studio development and requires a maximum height of 45 feet and three stories for buildings with approval of a Development Review Permit in order to encourage development of artist studio housing in the City.  The proposed development of 16 artist live-work studios is consistent with Land Use Element Policy 1.9.1 for projects in the Industrial Conservation District, which states: “Retain existing industrial, manufacturing and arts studio uses in the Olympic Corridor between Downtown and the Special Office District. Allow intensities of 1.5 FAR, 3-stories and 45’ by site review for artist studios only.” The project is also consistent with the goal of “expand(ing) the opportunity for residential land use while protecting the scale and character of existing neighborhoods” (Land Use Objective 1.10) by “allow(ing) live/work studios for artists in the Industrial Conservation District.”(Land Use Policy 1.10.3).  Moreover, the Housing Element of the General Plan encourages incentives for the development of housing in non-residential zones (Policy 1.2 of Goal 1.0).  

 

Alternative Actions:

In addition to the recommended action, the Planning Commission could consider the following with respect to the project:

 

A1.            Decline to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program.

A2.            Continue the project for specific reasons, consistent with applicable deadlines and with agreement from the applicant.

A3.            Articulate revised findings and/or conditions to Approve OR Deny, with or without prejudice, the subject application.

 

Conclusion

 

The proposed 16-unit artist live-work studio condominiums project is a compatible development for the subject property along Twelfth Street between Olympic Boulevard and Colorado Avenue because it includes uses that are anticipated and encouraged in the M1 Zoning District.  The proposed mass, scale and height of the structure is similar in design to, and generally compatible with the surrounding industrial neighborhood.  The building, as designed, complies with Municipal Code requirements and project design and development standards for the M1 zoning district.  Environmental review of the project concluded that the project’s impacts are less than significant, except for impacts during construction, which are reduced to less than significant levels through incorporation of mitigation measures.  Finally, the project continues the transition of this industrial area with the proposed artist lofts.  

 

Prepared by:              Ava M. Pecherzewski, Associate Planner

                                    Paul Foley, Principal Planner

Attachments

A.                 General Plan and Municipal Code Compliance Worksheet

B.                 Draft Statement of Official Action (includes recommended findings and/or conditions to act upon the project)

C.                Public Notification & Comment Material (includes notification requirements, radius map, published notice, site posting photographs, and correspondence)

D.                Resolution to Adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program

E.                 Project Plans and Photographs (includes aerial, neighborhood and site photographs and/or renderings)

F.         Final Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration

 


ATTACHMENT A

GENERAL PLAN AND MUNICIPAL CODE COMPLIANCE WORKSHEET

Project Location and Permit Processing Time Limits

Project Address:

1652 Twelfth Street

Application Filing Date:

June 9, 2005

CEQA Deadline:

An EIR was initially projected for this project, however, during the course of analysis, it was downgraded to an MND, therefore the project’s CEQA deadline was June 9, 2006 (without extension).  An extension was granted by the applicant which moves the CEQA deadline to September 9, 2006.

PSA Deadline:

Two Months following (Mitigated) Negative Declaration adoption, without extension.

Total Process Review Time (Days):

377 Days

 

General Plan and Municipal Code Compliance Worksheet

 

CATEGORY

 

LAND USE ELEMENT

 

 

MUNICIPAL CODE

 

 

PROJECT

 

Permitted Use

 

---

 

Artist studios and art galleries.

[SMMC 9.04.08.34.020(b)]

 

16-unit artist live-work studios (condominiums)

 

Dwelling Units

 

---

 

  No maximum in M1 Zone

 

 16 units

 

Height of Building

 

---

 

 45 feet for artist studios with approval of a Development Review Permit

[SMMC 9.04.08.34.060(a)]

 

45 feet from Average Natural Grade Line of 101.17’.

 

Number of Stories

 

---

 

Three stories for artist studios with approval of a Development Review Permit

[SMMC 9.04.08.34.060(a)]

 

Three stories (plus mezzanine)

 

F.A.R.

 

1.5 (22,500 sq. ft.) for artist studios with approval of a Development Review Permit

[SMMC 9.04.08.34.060(b)]

1.49 FAR (22,446 sq. ft.)

 

Setbacks

Frontyard

 

 

Sideyard

 

 

 

Rear Yard

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

Landscaping if required by SMMC 9.04.10.04 (No landscaping required for M1 Zone).

No side yard setbacks required.

 

No rear yard setbacks required.

[SMMC 9.04.08.34.060(d-f)]

350 sq. ft. of landscaping is provided in front of building.

Building is setback 11’10” from front property line.

Building varies on side from 0’ setback to 11’ setback.  

 

Building varies on rear from 0’ setback to 10’ setback.  

 

Mezzanine

 

N/A

 

Intermediate level open to space below. May not exceed 1/3 of room floor area.

[SMMC 9.04.02.030.485]

 

Project plans show that mezzanines do not exceed 1/3 of the floor area of the room below. Mezzanines range from 258 sq. ft. to 329 sq. ft.

 

Building Height

Projections

 

N/A

Parapet walls not exceeding 42” in height;

Elevator shafts and stairwells may project up to 14’ above the permitted height;

Mechanical equipment enclosures may project up to 12’ above the permitted height.

[SMMC 9.01.10.02.030)

 

Parapet walls do not exceed 42” above the maximum height;

Elevator shafts and stairwells and stairwell ventilation shafts do not exceed 11.5’ above the permitted height. 

No mechanical equipment is located on the roof:

Photovoltaic panels are located within the roofline of the building and do not project above the permitted height of the parapets.

 

Building Volume

Envelope

 

N/A

 

 

Any portion of a structure between 31 to 45 feet shall provide a 9' average setback from the street frontage:

 

12th St.: 9' x 100’ x 14 = 12,600 cubic feet is required.

[SMMC 9.04.10.02.040]

 

 

 

 

The building is setback 11’10” from the front property line and provides more than 14,00 cubic feet of setback from the street frontage between 31’ and 45’.

 

Height of Walls, Fences

 

N/A

 

No requirement in M1 Zone where there are no front, side or rear setbacks.

 

One existing 7’ wood fence on north side property line.

New 6’ high CMU wall on south side property line.

Reflective Materials

N/A

No more than 25% of the surface area of any façade on any new building shall contain black or mirrored glass or other mirror-like material that is highly reflective. Materials for roofing shall be of a non-reflective nature.

Corrugated metal panels will have a matte finish and will not cover more than 25% of the building.

 

Private Open Space

 

N/A

Any project containing four or more residential dwelling units shall provide the following minimum open space: one hundred square feet per unit for projects with four or five units, and fifty square feet per unit for projects of six units or more.

[SMMC 9.04.10.02.111d] 

Private open space in the form of private patios, decks and balconies ranging from 70 square feet to 475 square feet is provided for each unit.

 

Screening Mechanical Equipment

 

N/A

 

All mechanical equipment that extends more than 12” above the roof parapet shall be screened from view from a horizontal plane on all sides with an impact-resistant wall.

 

Mechanical equipment will be located within the subterranean parking garage and will not be located on the roof of the building.

 

Parking Access

 

Alley access is encouraged when alley exists.

 

Alley access is required when alley exists, with exceptions per Sec. 9.04.10.08.090.

 

Parking access is taken from the Eleventh Court Alley

 

Parking Space Number

 

N/A

 

Artist studios:

·         1 space per 750 sq. ft.  of residential area (10,180 SF) = 14 spaces;  

·         1 space per 400 sq. ft. of manufacturing space (11,810 SF) = 30 spaces;  

·         1 space per 300 sq. ft. of retail gallery space (No SF) = 0 spaces.

Visitor Spaces:

·           1 space per 5 residential units = 3 visitor spaces

Total Required Parking = 47 spaces 

 

60 parking spaces are provided within two levels of subterranean garage, including four van-accessible stalls. 

 

The City’s Transportation Management Division has reviewed the parking layout and has approved the proposed plans in concept.

 

Compact Parking %

 

N/A

 

40% maximum = 19 spaces permitted.

 

16 compact parking spaces are provided.

 

Bicycle Parking

 

N/A

 

Not required for residential buildings. For the commercial component of the building, a minimum of 4 bicycle parking spaces must be provided.

 

A bicycle parking rack of 6’ x 8’ in area is provided within the upper level of the garage, which will hold at least four bicycles.  

 

Loading Spaces

 

 

N/A

 

One loading space required for artist work area 11,810 sq. ft. Loading space must have minimum dimensions of 10’wide x 20’ long.

 

One loading space provided with dimensions of 10’ wide x 20’ deep.

 

Trash Area

 

N/A

 

Residential developments containing 11 to 20 units shall provide a refuse and recycling room 129 square feet in area with 8’ high walls or an outdoor enclosure of equal area with 6’ high walls.

 

A 175 sq. ft. trash enclosure is provided within the upper level of the parking garage.

 

The Solid Waste Division of EPWM has approved the proposed trash enclosure area in concept.

Unexcavated Front or Side Yard

N/A

Not applicable in the M1 Zone when the property does not abut any residential zones.

 

Approximately 1’ remains unexcavated from each side and rear property line and 3’ is unexcavated from the front property line.

Landscaping

N/A

No landscaping required for properties in the M1 Zone.

 

350 sq. ft. of landscaping is provided in front of the building and additional landscaping is provided in planters throughout the courtyard.

 

Inclusionary Units/Fees

 

Housing Element requires Program 12 compliance.

 

 Multi-family residential projects are subject to affordable housing requirements to provide either:  2 (10%) deed restricted, very low income affordable units on-site or 3 (20%) low-income affordable units on-site, provide the same amount of affordable units at an off-site location within a ¼ mile radius, acquire land for affordable housing, or pay an in-lieu fee of $26.08 per square foot.

[SMMC 9.56.040]

 

The applicant has opted to satisfy the affordable housing requirement by paying the in-lieu fee of $26.08 per square foot of residential square-footage.  Per SMMC 9.56.070, multi-family projects in industrial zoning districts on parcels that are not developed with multi-family housing, qualify for a 50% reduction in the affordable housing in-lieu fee. 

 


ATTACHMENT B

DRAFT STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL ACTION

 

City of Santa Monica

City Planning Division

 

DRAFT

PLANNING COMMISSION

STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL ACTION

 

 

PROJECT INFORAMTION

 

CASE NUMBER:                  05DR-008; 05DCP-003; 05TM-017; 05IS-004

 

LOCATION:                           1652 Twelfth Street

 

APPLICANT:                         Plus Architects

 

Property Owner:          1639 11th Street Associates, c/o Fred Plotke

 

CASE PLANNER:                Ava M. Pecherzewski, Associate Planner

 

REQUEST:                            To allow the construction of a 22,446 square-foot, three story plus loft, 45-foot high condominium building containing 16 artists live-work units and 60 parking spaces within two levels of subterranean garage. 

 

CEQA STATUS:                 Pursuant to State California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15063, an Initial Study was conducted and a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for this project to provide sufficient analysis to insure compliance with CEQA.  The Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (Attachment G) was circulated for a 30-day public review period from April 10 to May 10, 2006 and no comments were received. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration concluded that the project would have no impact or a less than significant impact in each of the following areas: Geology and Soils, Shadows, Public Services, Cumulative Impacts, Hydrology and Water Quality, Biological Resources, Air Quality, Population and Housing, Land Use and Planning, Transportation/Traffic, Utilities and Service System, Economic and Social Impacts, Recreation, Agricultural Resources, Energy & Mineral Resources, Hazards and Hazardous Materials. 

 

                                            In four categories, Aesthetics, Construction Effects, Cultural Resources and Noise, impacts during the construction period were identified that are potentially significant and require mitigation measures.  These measures are included in the proposed conditions of approval and are contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Plan attached to the Resolution adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration.

 

 

PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION

 

June 21, 2006

Determination Date

 

X

Approved based on the following findings and subject to the conditions below.

 

Denied.

 

Other:

 

EFFECTIVE DATES OF ACTIONS IF NOT APPEALED: 

July 6, 2006 for 05DR008 and 05DCP003

July 1, 2006 for 05TM017

EXPIRATION DATE OF ANY PERMITS GRANTED:

July 6, 2008 for 05DR008 and 05DCP003

July 1, 2008 for 05TM017

LENGTH OF ANY POSSIBLE EXTENSION OF EXPIRATION DATES*:

12 months for 05DR008 and 05DCP003

Maximum three (3) years with Planning Commission approval for Tentative Map

 

*     Any request for an extension of the expiration date must be received in the City Planning Division prior to expiration of this permit.

 

Each and all of the findings and determinations are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the Project.  All summaries of information contained herein or in the findings are based on the substantial evidence in the record.  The absence of any particular fact from any such summary is not an indication that a particular finding is not based in part on that fact.

 

FINDINGS:

 

DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FINDINGS

 

1.         The physical location, size, massing, and placement of proposed structures on the site and the location of proposed uses within the project are compatible with and relate harmoniously to surrounding sites and neighborhoods, in that the project will be similar in height to an existing artist studio building across the street, yet distinguishable within the M1 District given the building’s articulation, use of upper story balconies, fenestration, and façade embellishments. The variety in materials and shapes break up the geometry of the building into smaller pieces which serve to break up the mass and scale.  The provision of a central open courtyard and upper-level stepbacks, open space, and pedestrian-oriented design features such as ground-floor windows and pedestrian street access, upper-story balconies and decks and landscaping between the front façade and the street will ensure adequate light, air, and privacy for the residents. These design considerations and materials create an overall impression of the structure that is in character with the light industrial neighborhood, even though it will function, in part, as a residential use. Moreover, special conditions have been added to address transitions between the proposed residential development and the adjacent automobile tow yard use which has been in operation and served this neighborhood for several years. 

 

2.         The rights-of-way can accommodate autos and pedestrians, including parking and access, in that the garage is accessed from Eleventh Court alley, which is accessible from westbound Olympic Boulevard, a wide commercial street and, as conditioned, will meet all applicable parking and circulation requirements. Furthermore, sidewalks along both Twelfth Street and Olympic Boulevard are adequate for pedestrian access to the project. The development complies with the minimum number of required parking spaces and provides additional non-required parking to serve the project’s residents and visitors.

 

3.         The health and safety services (police, fire, etc.) and public infrastructure (e.g. utilities) are sufficient to accommodate the new development, in that that the proposed development is located within an urbanized area that is already adequately served by existing City infrastructure. As determined in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, no new safety services or public infrastructure will be required by this project.

 

4.         Any on-site provision of housing or parks and public open space, which are part of the required project mitigation measures required in Part 9.04.10.12 (Project Mitigation Measures) of the City of Santa Monica Comprehensive Land Use and Zoning Ordinance, satisfactorily meet the goals of the mitigation program, in that there are no requirements in that Code section that are applicable to this project.

 

5.         The project is generally consistent with the Municipal Code and General Plan, in that it has been designed to meet the requirement of the M1 District, which allows artist live-work studio development and requires a maximum height of 45 feet and three stories for buildings with approval of a Development Review Permit in order to encourage development of artist studio housing in the City.  The Housing Element of the General Plan encourages incentives for the development of housing in non-residential zones (Policy 1.2 of Goal 1.0).  Moreover, the proposed provision of 16 artist live-work studios is consistent with Land Use Element Policy 1.9.1 for projects in the Industrial Conservation District, which states: “Retain existing industrial, manufacturing and arts studio uses in the Olympic Corridor between Downtown and the Special Office District. Allow intensities of 1.5 FAR, 3-stories and 45’ by site review for artist studios only.”

 

6.         Reasonable mitigation measures have been included for all adverse impacts identified in the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration, in that the Initial Study for the project found that the project would have potentially significant adverse impacts only in the construction phase, and mitigation measures that were identified to reduce impacts to a level that is considered less than significant have been incorporated into the project’s conditions of approval.

 

TENTATIVE PACEL / TRACT MAP FINDINGS

 

1.                  The proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Government Code Section 65451. Specifically, while the subject property is not located in an area governed by a specific plan as specified in Government Code Section 65451, compliance with the City’s General Plan is required. For the purpose of subdividing the subject parcel, there are two pertinent policies that must be evaluated with the map; those policies relate to building height and unit density. As noted and shown on the subject map, the project complies with applicable policies, including unit density and height standards for the subject land use designation.

 

2.                  The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. Specifically, while the subject property is not located in an area governed by a specific plan, compliance with the City’s General Plan is required. As noted and shown on the subject map, the proposed improvements will not exceed land use designation limits to building height and unit density.

 

3.                  The site is physically suitable for the type of development. Specifically, the subject parcel is a standard-sized parcel located within an urbanized area adequately served by existing roadways and infrastructure. The property is physically able to accommodate the proposed development.

 

4.                  The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. Specifically, the subject parcel is a standard-sized parcel located within an urbanized area adequately served by existing roadways and infrastructure. Moreover the type of development and unit density is consistent with policies set forth in the City’s General Plan and other improvements in the general vicinity.

 

5.                  The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, in that the proposed subdivision is located in an urbanized area that does not contain habitats or would otherwise injure fish and wildlife.

 

6.                  The design of the subdivision or the type of improvement is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The proposed subdivision is for a property located in an urbanized area and is consistent with other similar improvements in the area. As noted and shown on the map, the project complies with height and unit density limitations set forth in the General Plan. The subdivision of the parcel does not have the potential to disrupt the urban environment or otherwise cause serious public health problems.

 

7.                  The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision in that there are no public easements located within the proposed subdivision.

 

8.                  The proposed subdivision is consistent with any ordinance or law of the City of Santa Monica. Specifically, the project has demonstrated compliance with applicable unit density and height limitations set forth in the underlying land use designation. Moreover, as conditioned, the project must comply with all applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, which will be comprehensively evaluated during the City’s plan check review process, prior to issuance of a building permit.

 

DESIGN COMPATIBILITY PERMIT FINDINGS

 

1.       The physical location, size, massing and placement of proposed structures on the site and the location of proposed amenities within the project are compatible with and relate harmoniously to surrounding sites and neighborhoods in that the project will be similar in height to an existing artist studio building across the street, yet be distinguishable within the M1 District given the building’s articulation, use of upper story balconies, fenestration, and façade embellishments. The variety in materials and shapes break up the geometry of the building into smaller pieces which serve to break up the mass and scale.  The provision of a central open courtyard and upper-level stepbacks, open space, and pedestrian-oriented design features such as ground-floor windows and pedestrian street access, upper-story balconies and decks and landscaping between the front façade and the street will ensure adequate light, air, and privacy for the residents. These design considerations and materials create an overall impression of the structure that is in character with the light industrial neighborhood, even though it will function, in part, as a residential use.

  

2.       The physical location, size, massing and placement of proposed structures on the site, and parking access and the location of proposed amenities within the project would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or general welfare in that the provision of a central open courtyard and upper-level stepbacks, open space, and pedestrian-oriented design features such as ground-floor windows and pedestrian street access, upper-story balconies and decks and landscaping between the front façade and the street will ensure adequate light, air, and privacy for the residents. Analysis of potential shadows from the building found that they would not significantly impact the adjacent commercial uses due to the project’s adjacency to undeveloped, paved parking lots on each side.   Moreover, special conditions have been added to address transitions between the proposed residential development and the adjacent automobile repair land use which has been in operation and served this neighborhood for several years.        

  

3.       The rights-of-way can accommodate autos and pedestrians, including adequate parking and access, in that that the garage is accessed from Eleventh Court alley, which is accessible from Olympic Boulevard, a wide commercial street and will meet all requirements of the Transportation Management Division.  Furthermore, sidewalks along both Twelfth Street and Olympic Boulevard are adequate for pedestrian access to the project. The development complies with the minimum number of required parking spaces and provides additional non-required parking to serve the project’s residents and visitors.

 

4.       The health and safety services (police, fire etc.) and public infrastructure (e.g., utilities) is sufficient to accommodate the new development, in that the proposed development is located within an urbanized area that is already adequately served by existing City infrastructure. As determined in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, no new safety services or public infrastructure will be required by this project.

 

5.       Reasonable mitigation measures have been included for all adverse impacts identified in an Initial Study in that the Initial Study for the project found that the project would have potentially significant adverse impacts only in the construction phase, and mitigation measures that were identified to reduce impacts to a level that is considered less than significant have been incorporated into the project’s conditions of approval.

 

6.       The proposed use conforms precisely to the minimum requirements outlined in Section 9.04.16, Subchapter 9.04.16.01.030, in that the proposed project, as conditioned below, and shown on the plans submitted by the applicant, demonstrates compliance with all applicable provisions of the City of Santa Monica Zoning Ordinance. 

 


CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:

 

PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

 

Special Project Conditions

 

1.         Prior to issuance of building permits, Condominium Association By-Laws and a Declaration of CC&R’s shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.  The The CC&R's shall contain a non-discrimination clause as presented in SMMC Section 9.20.20.020 and such provisions as are required by SMMC Section 9.04.16.01.030(d) and (e). The CC&R’s shall also contain a clause which limits the use and occupancy of the dwellings to artist live-work spaces. 

 

2.         Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit, for City review and approval, a deed restriction or other legal instrument setting forth the artist live-work use requirements for the project.  Such restrictions shall be effective for the life of the project.

 

3.         A minimum of 50 percent of the floor area of each individual artist studio unit shall be utilized for work space. 

 

Administrative

 

4.         The Planning Commission’s approval, conditions of approval, or denial of this application may be appealed to the City Council if the appeal is filed with the Zoning Administrator within fourteen consecutive days following the date of the Planning Commission’s determination in the manner provided in Part 9.04.20.24, Sections 9.04.20.24.010 through 9.04.20.24.040. (An appeal of the approval conditions of approval, or denial of a subdivision map must be filed with the City Clerk within ten consecutive days following the date of Planning Commission determination in the manner provided in Part 9.20.14, Section 9.20.14.070.) Any appeal must be made in the form required by the Zoning Administrator. The approval of this permit shall expire if the rights granted are not exercised within two years from the permit’s effective date.  Exercise of rights shall mean issuance of a building permit to commence construction.  However, the permit shall also expire if the building permit expires, if final inspection is not completed or a Certificate of Occupancy is not issued within the time periods specified in SMMC Section 8.08.060.  One twelve-month extension may be permitted for the Design Compatibility Permit and Development Review Permit if approved by the Director of Planning.  Applicant is on notice that time extensions shall not be granted if development standards or the development process relevant to the project have changed since project approval.  The Tentative Map may be extended for a period of three years with Planning Commission approval.

 

5.         Within ten days of City Planning Division transmittal of the Statement of Official Action, project applicant shall sign and return a copy of the Statement of Official Action prepared by the Planning Division, agreeing to the conditions of approval and acknowledging that failure to comply with such conditions shall constitute grounds for potential revocation of the permit approval.  By signing same, applicant shall not thereby waive any legal rights applicant may possess regarding said conditions.  The signed Statement shall be returned to the Planning Division.  Failure to comply with this condition shall constitute grounds for potential permit revocation.

 

6.         The tentative map shall expire 24 months after approval, except as provided in the provisions of California Government Code Section 66452.6 and Subchapter 9.20.18 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code.  During this time period the final map shall be presented to the City of Santa Monica for approval.  No building permit for the project will be granted until such time as the final map is approved by the Santa Monica City Council.

 

7.         Within thirty (30) days after final approval of the project, a sign shall be posted on site stating the date and nature of the approval.  The sign shall be posted in accordance with the Zoning Administrator guidelines and shall remain in place until a building permit is issued for the project.  The sign shall be removed promptly when a building permit is issued for the project or upon expiration of the Design Compatibility Permit.

 

8.         In the event permittee violates or fails to comply with any conditions of approval of this permit, no further permits, licenses, approvals or certificates of occupancy shall be issued until such violation has been fully remedied.

 

Conformance with Approved Plans

 

9.         This approval is for those plans dated June 08, 2005, a copy of which shall be maintained in the files of the City Planning Division.  Project development shall be consistent with such plans, except as otherwise specified in these conditions of approval.

 

10.       Minor amendments to the plans shall be subject to approval by the Director of Planning.  A significant change in the approved concept shall be subject to Planning Commission Review.  Construction shall be in conformance with the plans submitted or as modified by the Planning Commission, Architectural Review Board or Director of Planning.

 

11.       The plans shall comply with all other provisions of Article IX of the Municipal Code, (Zoning Ordinance) and all other pertinent ordinances and General Plan policies of the City of Santa Monica.

 


Fees

 

12.       A Park and Recreation Facilities Tax of $200.00 per residential unit shall be due and payable at the time of issuance of a building permit for the construction or placement of the residential units on the subject lot, per and subject to the provisions of Section 6.80.010 et seq. of the Santa Monica Municipal Code.

 

13.       Pursuant to Santa Monica Municipal Code (SMMC) Chapter 9.56, the project is subject to the City's Affordable Housing Production Program which requires a 16-unit development to provide at least two very low income affordable units or three low income affordable units or 16 moderate income affordable units on-site (SMMC Section 9.56.050), provide the affordable units off-site (SMMC Section 9.56.060), pay an affordable housing fee (SMMC Section 9.56.070), or acquire land for affordable housing (SMMC Section 9.56.080).

 

The developer has elected to satisfy the City’s Affordable Housing Production requirement through payment of the applicable affordable housing fee which is calculated based on the project’s floor area as defined by SMMC Section 9.04.02.030.315. The fee will be calculated prior to payment based on the requirements of the Affordable Housing Production Program.  The fee must be paid in full prior to the City granting any approval for the occupancy of the project.

 

14.       Prior to issuance of a condominium license, the developer shall provide for the payment of a Condominium Tax of $1,000 per planned salable unit pursuant to Chapter 6.76 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code.

 

Mitigation Monitoring Program

 

15.       Pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, the City Planning Division will coordinate a monitoring and reporting program regarding any required changes to the project made in conjunction with project approval and any conditions of approval, including those conditions intended to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment.  This program shall include, but is not limited to, ensuring that the City Planning Division itself and other City divisions and departments such as the Building and Safety Division, the Department of Environmental and Public Works, the Fire Department, the Police Department, the Planning and Community Development Department and the Finance Department are aware of project requirements which must be satisfied prior to issuance of a Building Permit, Certificate of Occupancy, or other permit, and that other responsible agencies are also informed of conditions relating to their responsibilities.  Project owner shall demonstrate compliance with conditions of approval in a written report submitted to the Planning Director and Building Officer prior to issuance of a Building Permit or Certificate of Occupancy, and, as applicable, provide periodic reports regarding compliance with such conditions.

 

Cultural Resources

 

16.       If any archaeological remains are uncovered during excavation or construction, work in the affected area shall be suspended and a recognized specialist shall be contacted to conduct a survey of the affected area at project's owner's expense.  A determination shall then be made by the Director of Planning to determine the significance of the survey findings and appropriate actions and requirements, if any, to address such findings.

 

Final Design

 

17.       Plans for final design, landscaping, screening, trash enclosures, and signage shall be subject to review and approval by the Architectural Review Board.

 

18.       The Architectural Review Board, in its review, shall pay particular attention to the project's pedestrian orientation and amenities; scale and articulation of design elements; exterior colors, textures and materials; window treatment; glazing; and landscaping. Also, the Architectural Review Board should give careful consideration of the building’s entry area. 

 

19.       All materials used for exterior building surfaces shall be of low reflectivity finish. Paint used for exterior facades shall be of low reflectivity.  Metal surfaces shall be brush-polished and not highly reflective.             

 

20.       Landscaping plans shall comply with Subchapter 9.04.10.04 (Landscaping Standards) of the Zoning Ordinance including use of water-conserving landscaping materials, landscape maintenance and other standards contained in the Subchapter.

 

21.       Refuse areas, storage areas and mechanical equipment shall be screened in accordance with SMMC Section 9.04.10.02.130, 140, and 150.  Refuse areas shall be of a size adequate to meet on-site need, including recycling.  The Architectural Review Board in its review shall pay particular attention to the screening of such areas and equipment.  Any rooftop mechanical equipment shall be minimized in height and area, and shall be located in such a way as to minimize noise and visual impacts to surrounding properties.  Unless otherwise approved by the Architectural Review Board, rooftop mechanical equipment shall be located at least five feet from the edge of the roof.  Except for solar hot water heaters, no residential water heaters shall be located on the roof.

 

22.       No gas or electric meters shall be located within the required front or street side yard setback areas.  The Architectural Review Board in its review shall pay particular attention to the location and screening of such meters.

 

23.       Prior to consideration of the project by the Architectural Review Board, the applicant shall review disabled access requirements with the Building and Safety Division and make any necessary changes in the project design to achieve compliance with such requirements.  The Architectural Review Board, in its review, shall pay particular attention to the aesthetic, landscaping, and setback impacts of any ramps or other features necessitated by accessibility requirements.

 

24.       As appropriate, the Architectural Review Board shall require the use of anti-graffiti materials on surfaces likely to attract graffiti.

 

Construction Plan Requirements

 

25.       Final building plans submitted for approval of a building permit shall include on the plans a list of all permanent mechanical equipment to be placed indoors which may be heard outdoors.

 

26.       The units on the north side of the building, on all levels, shall use dual-paned windows to reduce noise impacts associated with the adjacent towing yard use. 

 

Construction Period

 

27.       During construction, a security fence, the height of which shall be the maximum permitted by the Zoning Ordinance, shall be maintained around the perimeter of the lot.  The lot shall be kept clear of all trash, weeds, etc.

 

28.       Vehicle hauling dirt or other construction debris from the site shall cover any open load with a tarpaulin or other secure covering to minimize dust emissions.  Immediately after commencing dirt removal from the site, the general contractor shall provide the City of Santa Monica with written certification that all trucks leaving the site are covered in accordance with this condition of approval.

 

29.       Developer shall prepare a notice, subject to the review by the Director of Planning and Community Development, that lists all construction mitigation requirements, permitted hours of construction, and identifies a contact person at City Hall as well as the developer who will respond to complaints related to the proposed construction.  The notice shall be mailed to property owners and residents within a 200-foot radius from the subject site at least five (5) days prior to the start of construction.

 

30.       A sign shall be posted on the property in a manner consistent with the public hearing sign requirements which shall identify the address and phone number of the owner and/or applicant for the purposes of responding to questions and complaints during the construction period.  Said sign shall also indicate the hours of permissible construction work.

 

31.       A copy of these conditions shall be posted in an easily visible and accessible location at all times during construction at the project site.  The pages shall be laminated or otherwise protected to ensure durability of the copy.

 

32.       All diesel equipment shall be operated with closed engine doors and shall be equipped with factory-recommended mufflers.

 

33.       Electrical power shall be used to run air compressors and similar power tools. 

 

34.       Excavation, foundation-laying, and conditioning activities (the noisiest phase of construction) shall be restricted to between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, in accordance with Section 4.12.110(d) of the Santa Monica Municipal Code as it would apply to residential zones.

 

35.       For all noise-generating construction activity on the project site, additional noise attenuation techniques shall be employed to reduce noise levels to City of Santa Monica noise standards. Such techniques may include, but are not limited to, the use of sound blankets on noise generating equipment and the construction of temporary sound barriers between construction sites and nearby sensitive receptors.

 

Standard Conditions

 

36.       Lofts or mezzanines shall not exceed 33.3% of the room below unless compliance with the district's limits on number of stories can be maintained. Lofts or mezzanines located in studio units shall not exceed 99 square feet unless parking in compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements is provided.

 

37.       Mechanical equipment shall not be located on the side of any building which is adjacent to a residential building on the adjoining lot.  Roof locations may be used when the mechanical equipment is installed within a sound-rated parapet enclosure.

 

38.       Final approval of any mechanical equipment installation will require a noise test in compliance with SMMC Section 4.12.040.  Equipment for the test shall be provided by the owner or contractor and the test shall be conducted by the owner or contractor.  A copy of the noise test results on mechanical equipment shall be submitted to the Community Noise Officer for review to ensure that noise levels do not exceed maximum allowable levels for the applicable noise zone.

 

39.       Final parking lot layout and specifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the Transportation Management Division.

 

40.       Prior to issuance of a building permit, a copy of the recorded map shall be provided to the City Planning Division.

 

41.       Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with Subchapter 9.04.16 Condominiums, including the provisions of Ordinance No. 2131 (CCS).

 

42.       Construction period signage shall be subject to the approval of the Architectural Review Board.

 

43.       The property owner shall insure any graffiti on the site is promptly removed through compliance with the City’s graffiti removal program.

 

44.       The operation shall at all times be conducted in a manner not detrimental to surrounding properties or residents by reason of lights, noise, activities, parking or other actions.

 

ENVIRONMENTAL PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT (EPWM)

 

Drainage

 

45.       To mitigate storm water and surface runoff from the project site, an Urban Runoff Mitigation Plan may be required by the Department of Environmental and Public Works Management (EPWM) pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 7.10.  Prior to submittal of landscape plans for Architectural Review Board approval, the applicant shall contact EPWM to determine applicable requirements, which include the following:

 

·                    Non-stormwater runoff, sediment and construction waste from the construction site and parking areas is prohibited from leaving the site;

·                    An sediments or materials which are tracked off-site must be removed the same day they are tracked off-site;

·                    Excavated soil must be located on the site and soil piles should be covered and otherwise protected so that sediments do not go into the street or adjoining properties;

·                    Washing of construction or other vehicles shall be allowed adjacent to a construction site.  No runoff from washing vehicles on a construction site shall be allowed to leave the site;

·                    Drainage controls may be required depending on the extent of grading and topography of the site; and

·                    New development is required to reduce projected runoff pollution by at least twenty percent through incorporation of design elements or principles, such as increasing permeable surfaces, diverting or catching runoff via swales, berms, and the like; orientation of drain gutters towards permeable areas; modification of grades; use of retention structures and other methods.

 


Streets

 

46.       Unless otherwise approved by the Department of Environmental and Public Works Management, all sidewalks shall be kept clear and passable during the grading and construction phase of the project.

 

47.       Sidewalks, curbs, gutters, paving and driveways which need replacing or removal as a result of the project as determined by the Department of Environmental and Public Works Management shall be reconstructed to the satisfaction of the Department of Environmental and Public Works Management.  Approval for this work shall be obtained from the Department of Environmental and Public Works Management prior to issuance of the building permits.

 

48.       Street and/or alley lighting shall be provided on public rights of way adjacent to the project if and as needed per the specifications and with the approval of the Department of Environmental and Public Works.

 

Off-site

 

49.       All off site improvements required by the City Engineer shall be installed.  Plans and specifications for off site improvements shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and approved by the City Engineer.

 

50.       A subdivision improvement agreement for all off site improvements required by the City Engineer shall be prepared and a performance bond posted through the City Attorney's office.

 

Environmental Mitigation

 

51.       To mitigate solid waste impacts, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, project owner shall submit a recycling plan to the Department of Environmental and Public Works Management for its approval.  The recycling plan shall include:

 

1)         List of materials such as white paper, computer paper, metal cans, and glass to be recycled;

2)         Location of recycling bins;

3)         Designated recycling coordinator;

4)         Nature and extent of internal and external pick-up service;

5)         Pick-up schedule; and

6)         Plan to inform tenants/ occupants of service.

 

52.       Ultra-low flow plumbing fixtures are required on all new development and remodeling where plumbing is to be added.  (Maximum 1.6 gallon toilets and 1.0 gallon urinals and low flow shower head.)

 

 

Construction Period Mitigation

 

53.       A construction period mitigation plan shall be prepared by the applicant for approval by the Department of Environmental and Public Works Management prior to issuance of a building permit.  The approved mitigation plan shall be posted on the site for the duration of the project construction and shall be produced upon request.  As applicable, this plan shall:

 

1)         Specify the names, addresses, telephone numbers and business license numbers of all contractors and subcontractors as well as the developer and architect;

2)         Describe how demolition of any existing structures is to be accomplished; 3) Indicate where any cranes are to be located for erection/construction;

4)         Describe how much of the public street, alleyway, or sidewalk is proposed to be used in conjunction with construction;

5)         Set forth the extent and nature of any pile-driving operations;

6)         Describe the length and number of any tiebacks which must extend under the property of other persons;

7)         Specify the nature and extent of any dewatering and its effect on any adjacent buildings;

8)         Describe anticipated construction-related truck routes, number of truck trips, hours of hauling and parking location;

9)         Specify the nature and extent of any helicopter hauling;

10)      State whether any construction activity beyond normally permitted hours is proposed;

11)      Describe any proposed construction noise mitigation measures;

12)      Describe construction-period security measures including any fencing, lighting, and security personnel;

13)      Provide a drainage plan;

14)      Provide a construction-period parking plan which shall minimize use of public streets for parking;

15)      List a designated on-site construction manager;

16)      Provide a construction materials recycling plan which seeks to maximize the reuse/recycling of construction waste;

17)      Provide a plan regarding use of recycled and low-environmental-impact materials in building construction; and

18)      Provide a construction period water runoff control plan.

 

Final Map Requirements

 

54.       In submitting required materials to the Santa Monica Engineering Division for a final map, applicant shall provide a copy of the approved Statement of Official Action.

 

55.       The form, contents, accompanying data, and filing of the final subdivision map shall conform to the provisions of SMMC Sections 9.20.12.010 through 9.20.08.090 and the Subdivision Map Act.  The required Final Map filing fee shall be paid prior to scheduling of the Final Map for City Council approval.

 

56.       One mylar and one blue-line copy of the final map shall be provided to and recorded with the Los Angeles County Recorder prior to issuance of any building permit for a condominium project pursuant to Government Code Section 66499.30. Applicant shall also provide the County with a copy of this Statement of Official Action at the time the required copies of the map are submitted.

 

57.       Prior to approval of the Final Map, the requirements of Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 9.04.10.16.010 (d) shall have been met.

 

OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT

 

58.       Street trees shall be maintained, relocated or provided as required in a manner consistent with the City's Community Forest Management Plan 2000, per the specifications of the Open Space Management Division of the Community and Cultural Service Department and the City’s Tree Code (SMMC Chapter 7.40).  No street trees shall be removed without the approval of the Open Space Management Division.

 

FIRE

 

  1. A security gate shall be provided across the opening to the subterranean garage.  If any guest parking space is located in the subterranean garage, the security gate shall be equipped with an electronic or other system which will open the gate to provide visitors with vehicular access to the garage without leaving their vehicles.  The security gate shall receive approval of the Police and Fire Departments prior to issuance of a building permit.

 

 

VOTE

 

Ayes:             

Nays:             

Abstain:         

Absent:          

 

 

NOTICE

 

If this is a final decision not subject to further appeal under the City of Santa Monica Comprehensive Land Use and Zoning Ordinance, the time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6, which provision has been adopted by the City pursuant to Municipal Code Section 1.16.010.

 

I hereby certify that this Statement of Official Action accurately reflects the final determination of the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Monica.

 

 

_____________________________       _____________________________

Jay P. Johnson, Chairperson                      Date

Gwynne Pugh, Vice Chairperson               

 

 

Acknowledgement by Permit Holder

 

I hereby agree to the above conditions of approval and acknowledge that failure to comply with such conditions shall constitute grounds for potential revocation of the permit approval.

 

 

Print Name and Title

 

 

 

 

Applicant’s Signature

 

 

 


ATTACHMENT C

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION INFORMATION

 

Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 9.04.20.20.080 and in accordance with the posting requirements set forth by the Zoning Administrator, prior to application filing the applicant posted a sign on the property regarding the subject application.  At least 8 weeks prior to the public hearing date, the applicant submitted a photograph to verify the site posting and to demonstrate that the sign provides the following information:  Project case number, brief project description, name and telephone number of applicant, site address, date, time and location of public hearing, and the City Planning Division phone number.  It is the applicant's responsibility to update the hearing date if it is changed after posting.

 

In addition, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 9.04.20.22.050, notice of the public hearing was mailed to all owners and residential and commercial tenants of property located within a 500 foot radius of the project and published in the “California” Section of The Los Angeles Times at least ten consecutive calendar days prior to the hearing.

 

On April 5, 2006, the applicant was notified by phone and in writing of the subject hearing date.

 

The applicant provided the following information regarding attempts to contact area property owners, residents, and recognized neighborhood associations:

Adjacent Neighbors

Presented the project to the adjacent residents of the artist studios across the street at 1643 12th Street.

Community Meetings

No information provided.

Neighborhood Group:

Pico Neighborhood Association

Contacted group representative and scheduled meeting.

 


NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING

BEFORE THE SANTA MONICA PLANNING COMMISSION

 

SUBJECT:        Development Review Permit 05DR-008; Design Compatibility Permit 05DCP-003; Vesting Tentative Tract Map 05TM-017; Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 05IS-004

 

1652 Twelfth Street

                        APPLICANT:                             Plus Architects

                        PROPERTY OWNER:                1639 11th Street Associates, c/o Fred Plotke 

 

A public hearing will be held by the Planning Commission to consider the following request:

 

An application for a Development Review Permit, Design Compatibility Permit and Vesting Tentative Tract Map, and adoption of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the construction of a 22,446 square-foot, three-story plus loft, 45’-high, 16-unit artist live-work condominium building with two levels of subterranean parking containing 60 spaces. 

 

Pursuant to SMMC Section 9.04.08.34.060, a Development Review Permit is required for artist studio buildings of three stories and 45-feet in the M1 (Industrial Conservation) District.  Pursuant to SMMC Section 9.04.20.15, a Design Compatibility Permit is required for condominium buildings, and pursuant to SMMC Section 9.20.06, a Tentative Subdivision Map is required to subdivide the parcel into 16 condominium units.  

 

DATE/TIME:                  WEDNESDAY, June 21, 2006, AT 7:00 p.m.

 

LOCATION:                   City Council Chambers, Second Floor

                                    Santa Monica City Hall

                        1685 Main Street, Santa Monica, California

 

HOW TO COMMENT

The City of Santa Monica encourages public comment. You may comment at the Planning Commission public hearing, or by writing a letter. Written information will be given to the Planning Commission at the meeting.

 

Address your letters to:              Ava M. Pecherzewski, Associate Planner

                                                Re: 05DR-008

                                                City Planning Division

                                                1685 Main Street, Room 212

                                                Santa Monica, CA 90401

 

MORE INFORMATION

If you want more information about this project or wish to review the project file, please contact Ava Pecherzewski at (310) 458-8341, or by e-mail at ava.pecherzewski@smgov.net. The Zoning Ordinance is available at the Planning Counter during business hours and on the City’s web site at www.santa-monica.org.

 

The meeting facility is wheelchair accessible. For disability-related accommodations, please contact (310) 458-8341 or (310) 458-8696 TTY at least 72 hours in advance. All written materials are available in alternate format upon request. Santa Monica Big Blue Bus Lines numbered 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, and 10 serve City Hall.

 

Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65009(b), if this matter is subsequently challenged in Court, the challenge may be limited to only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Santa Monica at, or prior to, the public hearing.

ESPAÑOL

Esto es una noticia de una audiencia pública para revisar applicaciónes proponiendo desarrollo en Santa Monica.  Si deseas más información, favor de llamar a Carmen Gutierrez en la División de Planificación al número (310) 458-8341.

 

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

 

___________________________

Amanda Schachter

Planning Manager