|
|
|
MINUTES |
|
|
MEETING OF THELANDMARKS COMMISSION Founded 1875 “Populus felix in urbe felici” |
|
|
|
Monday,
May 12, 2003 |
|
|
7:00
p.m. |
City Council
Chambers, Room 213, 1685 Main
Street, Santa Monica |
CALL TO ORDER: 7:11 p.m.
1. ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioner Fresco
Chair Pro Tem Genser
Commissioner Kaplan
Commissioner Posek
Commissioner Schnitzler
Also Present:
Kimberly Christensen
Elizabeth Bar-El
Barry Rosenbaum
Arlene Johnson
Councilman Michael Feinstein
Absent:
Chairperson Lehrer
Commissioner Rosenfield
2 REPORT FROM STAFF:
Ms. Bar-El
gave an update on 415 Pacific Coast Highway, the Marion Davies Estate. Historic Resource Group prepared a technical
report and Community and Cultural services has now received approval from the
State Department of Parks and Recreation to demolish the following buildings:
two cabana structures, banquet building, locker building, (including enclosed
porch, reception area, deck structure, ancillary maintenance storage sheds). None are historic nor contribute to the
historic character of the estate. The
landmark approval for the Mariasol Restaurant was appealed and will be going to
City Council, May 20th. Also, May will
be proclaimed as Historic Preservation month at the May 13th City
Council meeting.
3. COMMISSIONER ANNOUNCEMENTS:
None
4. APPROVAL OF
MINUTES:
Public Input Permitted
A. April
14, 2003
Commissioner
Fresco made a motion to approve the minutes.
Commissioner Posek seconded the
motion, which passed unanimously by voice vote with Commissioner Kaplan
abstaining, and the following corrections:
On page 8, the Adhoc Committee members are Commissioner Posek and
Commissioner Rosenfield; on page 9; strike Chair Pro Tem Genser’s comment on
the Community Garden; on page 4 (9-a), the correct continued date should be
June 9th.
5. APPROVAL
OF STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL ACTION:
A. Statement of
Official Action: Certificate of Appropriateness LC-03CA-004, 401 Santa Monica
Pier. Request to revise approved
windows on the upper level addition to Mariasol Restaurant, located on the
Landmark Santa Monica Pier.
B. Landmark
Designation Application LC-02LM-010, 502-504 Raymond Avenue, designating the
structure as a City Landmark.
Commissioner
Posek made a motion to approve Item 5b.
Commissioner Fresco seconded the motion, which passed unanimously by
voice vote.
Commissioner Schnitzler made a motion to approve Item 5a modifying the
findings as follows: The proposed
work would not detrimentally change, destroy or adversely affect any exterior
feature of the landmark Santa Monica Pier because the proposed windows would
not impact character-defining features of the Landmark Santa Monica Pier. Furthermore, the windows as installed by the
applicant and retroactively approved herein meet the intent of the Pier Design
Guidelines, which call for variation and eclectic window design. Commissioner
Kaplan seconded the motion, which passed by the following vote:
Rollcall
vote: Posek, Schnitzler, Fresco, Genser
Abstain:
Kaplan,
Absent
Rosenfield, Lehrer
6. PUBLIC INPUT: (On items not
on agenda and within the jurisdiction of the Commission)
None.
7. CONSENT
CALENDAR:
Public Input Permitted
None.
8. OLD
BUSINESS:
Public Input Permitted
A. Review of
Demolition Permit and Consideration Whether to File an Application For
Designation of a Structure as a Landmark or Structure of Merit. (Continued
from April 14, 2003)
159 Hollister
Avenue (PC014278)
OP2-Ocean Park
Low Multiple Residential
2-Story, 7 Unit, Multiple Dwelling
Structure Not Identified in Historic
Resources Inventory
The following members of the public
addressed the Commission: David
Effress, Philip Ganezer, owner and Michael Felonis. They discussed the poor structural condition of the building and
the numerous modifications made over time.
Commissioner
Fresco expressed her concern about the history that the building
represents. She felt strongly that this
building should be saved, and would like to see at least the front corner
façade remain.
Commissioner
Kaplan stated that she thought the building represented a certain era of the
City’s development. However, she felt
there were better examples of that period and nicer pieces of
architecture.
Commissioner
Posek felt that there was no way to save this building.
Commissioner
Schnitzler stated that the building is in very bad condition, and basically is
no longer a commercial structure. She
stated that she would not be in favor of preserving the façade only because it
diminishes the integrity to keep a façade with a new building behind it.
Chair Pro Tem
Genser stated that he would not support nominating this structure, and would
hope that the new owner and architect would try to build a replacement that
would be conducive to the rest of the street.
The Commission
took no action on this item.
9. NEW BUSINESS/PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Public Input
Permitted
None.
10. DISCUSSION
ITEMS:
Public
Input Permitted
A. Review of
Demolition Permits and Consideration Whether to File an Application For
Designation of a Structure as a Landmark or Structure of Merit.
1. 715
18th Street (PC014368)
R1-Single Family Residential
2-Car Garage
Structure Identified in the
Historic Resource Inventory as 5D
The following
member of the public addressed the Commission: Kevin McCauley, owner.
2. 525
Marine Street (PC014390)
OP2-Low Multiple Residential
Single Family Resident
w/Detached 3-Car Garage
Structure Not Identified in
the Historic Resource Inventory
No action was
taken on these items.
B. Discussion of 1911
La Mesa Drive (Oscar Neimeyer/ Strick House) and Consideration of Whether to
file an Application for Designation of the Property as a City Landmark.
Commissioner Schnitzler recused herself
from this discussion item.
The following
member of the public addressed the Commission: Michael Boyd, owner.
Following a
lengthy discussion, Commissioner Fresco made a motion to continue this item to
next month so the Commission could see the owner’s plans to add a new
garage. Commissioner Kaplan seconded
the motion, which passed unanimously by voice vote.
C. Presentation of the
City’s Historic Resources Inventory, including explanation of how it has
developed and how it is used.
This item was
continued to next month.
D. Consideration of
proposals for inclusion in a resolution delegating authority to the Landmarks
Commission Secretary for certain types of modifications requiring a Certificate
of Appropriateness.
Report presented by Ms. Bar-El with staff’s
suggestions for modifications that might be considered for staff level
Certificates of Appropriateness.
Commissioner Kaplan stated that she felt
comfortable with Items 2 and 4 only.
She also felt that when staff approvals are given, the community is not
given the benefit of the diverse points of view of the Commission but, rather a
professional planning point of view only.
Commissioner Schnitzler stated she has a
problem with Item 1 because it is too vague.
Items 3 and 4 she felt are good and would streamline the process,
although she would add to B that changes should not be visible from the street,
even on non-contributing structures.
Commissioner Fresco stated that she is
concerned with allowing signage to be staff approved.
Due to the absence of Chairperson Lehrer and Commissioner Rosenfield,
Commissioner
Fresco made a motion to continue this item to June 9th. Commissioner Schnitzler seconded the motion, which passed unanimously by voice
vote.
E. Report of Ad-hoc
Joint Landmarks/Planning Commission Sub-committee on Incentives and Potential
Amendments to the Municipal Code, including discussion of Council Budget
Priorities for FY03-04.
Report presented by Chair Pro Tem
Genser.
Councilman
Feinstein stated that the annual budget hearings would take place on May
27-29. Each department makes a presentation
about the department’s priorities. The
City Council will ask specific questions in order to identify what their future
workload will be.
F. Planning Commission Case List (Information
Only)
11. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
Public Input Permitted
Councilmember
Feinstein stated that the real estate notice item is on the City Council’s
agenda. He spoke to the head of the
Beverly Hills Association of Realtors, who has been trying to get the county
assessor’s office to include this on the county level for quite some time. They were not interested, but now that the
City has a potential ordinance, they sent it back to the assessor’s office to
have them rethink again.
Also,
in regard to 159 Hollister Avenue, there is a curb extension in front of the
building that was added as a crosswalk enhancement. He stated it would be interesting if there were a plaque in the
sidewalk about the historic status of that corner. There is a lot of space there and it could be similar to the Pico
streetscape project.
12. FUTURE
AGENDA ITEMS: (Requests from
Commissioners to add items to upcoming agendas)
Commissioner Schnitzler asked for an update next month from staff
regarding the property in the 1400 block of 4th Street that is under
development and retaining only its facade.
Also, a discussion on the consequences for Landmark property owners that
violate permit requirements.
13. NEXT MEETING DATE AND COMMISSION AGENDA: Monday, June 9, 2003.
14. ADJOURNMENT: 9:15 p.m.