|
|
AGENDA |
|
|
|
REGULAR MEETING OF THE LANDMARKS COMMISSION Founded 1875 “Populus felix in urbe felici” |
|
|
|
Monday, April 11, 2005 7:00 PM |
City Council
Chambers, Room 213 |
|
|
|
CALL
TO ORDER
1.
ROLL CALL
2.
REPORT FROM
STAFF:
Information
concerning future Landmarks Commission Agendas. Update on recent Architectural
Review Board, Planning Commission, and City Council actions, including
development projects, planning policy studies, ordinances, appeals and update
of project status and related landmarks matters.
3.
COMMISSIONER
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
4.
APPROVAL OF
MINUTES:
A. March 14, 2005
5.
APPROVAL OF
STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL ACTION:
None.
6.
PUBLIC INPUT: (On items not
on agenda and within the jurisdiction of the Commission)
7.
CONSENT
CALENDAR:
A.
Certificate of
Appropriateness 05-CA-005, 301 Santa Monica Pier, requesting to modify the
existing front patio enclosure and to relocate one existing modular door on the
front façade of Rusty’s Surf Ranch restaurant located at 301 Santa Monica Pier.
(Continued)
8.
OLD BUSINESS:
None.
9.
NEW
BUSINESS/PUBLIC HEARINGS:
None.
10.
DISCUSSION
ITEMS:
A.
Review of
Demolition Permits and Consideration Whether to File an Application For Designation of a Structure as a Landmark
or Structure of Merit.
1.
R2-Low
Density, Multiple Residential
Single
Family Residence and Shed
Structure
Not Identified in the Historic Resources Inventory
(Reviewed by Landmarks Commission on 08/11/2003;
no action taken)
2.
R2-Low
Density, Multiple Residential
Single
Family Residence and Detached Garage
Structure
Not Identified in the Historic Resources Inventory
(Reviewed by Landmarks Commission on 08/11/2003;
no action taken)
3.
R2-Low
Density, Multiple Residential
Single
Family Residence and Detached Garage
Structure
Not Identified in the Historic Resources Inventory
4.
R2- Low Density, Multiple Residential
Relocate Existing Single Family Residence
to
Structure
Not Identified in the Historic Resources Inventory
5.
R2- Low Density,
Multiple Residential
Single Family Residence
Structure
Not Identified in the Historic Resources Inventory
6.
R1-Single Family
Residential
Single Family Residence
and Garage
Structure
Not Identified in the Historic Resources Inventory
7.
R2-Low Density Multiple
Residential
Multi-Family Residential
Building and Detached Garage
Structure
Not Identified in the Historic Resources Inventory
8.
R1-Single Family
Residential
Single Family Residence
and Detached Garage
Structure
Not Identified in the Historic Resources Inventory
9.
R1-Single Family
Residential
Single Family Residence
and Detached Garage and Shed
Listed in Historic Resource Inventory as 5D
10.
R2-Low Density Multiple
Residential
Two Multi-Family
Residential Buildings, Two Units
Structure Not Identified
in the Historic Resources Inventory
11.
R1-Single Family
Residential
Single Family Residence
and Garage
Structure Not Identified
in the Historic Resources Inventory
12.
R1-Single Family
Residential
Single Family Residence
and Garage
Structure Not Identified
in the Historic Resources Inventory
13.
R1-Single Family
Residential
Single Family Residence
and Detached Garage
Structure Not Identified
in the Historic Resources Inventory
14.
R1-Single Family
Residential
Single Family Residence
and Detached, 2 Car Garage
Structure Not Identified
in the Historic Resources Inventory
15.
R2-Low Density, Multiple
Residential
Single Family Residence
and 2 Car Garage
Structure Not Identified
in the Historic Resources Inventory
16.
R3-Medium Density
Multiple Family Residential
Three Multi-Family
Residential Buildings, Five Units
Structure Not Identified
in the Historic Resources Inventory
17.
R2B-Low Density Multiple
Residential Beach District
Single Family Residence
and Detached Garage
Listed on Historic Resource Inventory as 5D
18.
R2-Low Density Multiple
Family Residential
Single Family Residence
Structure Not Identified
in the Historic Resources Inventory
19.
R2-Low Density, Multiple
Residential
Single Family Residence,
2 Unit Apartment Building and Garages
B.
Report from
City Council Liaison to the Landmarks Commission on recent City Council actions
related to appeals, development projects, planning policy studies and ordinances,
and information concerning future City Council agendas.
C.
Report from
Landmarks Commission Liaison to the Architectural Review Board (ARB) on recent
ARB consideration and action taken on proposed projects involving additions to
or modifications of potential historic resources.
D.
Request that
the Landmarks Commission appoint two new members to the ad-hoc subcommittee of
Commissioners formed to review technical materials including the Historic
Structures Report, Guidelines for Rehabilitation, and related documents
associated with 415 Pacific Coast Highway (the former Marion Davies Estate).
E.
Consideration
whether to file an application for designation of the multi-family residential
structure located at
F.
Consideration
whether to file an application for designation of the property located at
G.
Discussion
regarding the Landmarks Commission authorizing photo documentation prior to
demolition of the First Church of Christ Scientist of
H.
Discussion of
existing demolition permit review process for properties 40 years or older proposed
for demolition in conjunction with a proposed development that is subject to
discretionary review, including potential recommendation to City Council requesting
that the existing process be revised to require demolition permits applications
for properties 40 years or older be reviewed by the Landmarks Commission prior
to any discretionary review of a replacement project on the site. (JB)
I.
Discussion and review of draft revisions to the Certificate
of Appropriateness Staff Approval Resolution 03-001. (RG)
J.
Discussion of potential online broadcasting of future
Landmarks Commission meetings.
K.
Discussion of
a potential historic street lamp policy for the City including a potential
recommendation from the Landmarks Commission to the Planning and Community
Development Department regarding streetscape improvements on Second and Fourth
Streets. (NF)
L.
Planning Commission Case List (Information Only).
11.
WRITTEN
COMMUNICATIONS:
A.
Letters
from Janet Boltz, Rose Drake, Liz Provenzano, and Paula & Gordon Treharne requesting
that the Landmarks Commission consider whether to file an application for
designation of a tree located
B.
Letter
from Allen Lazarus requesting that the Landmarks Commission consider whether to
file an application for designation of the property located at
12.
FUTURE AGENDA
ITEMS: (Requests from
Commissioners to add items to upcoming agendas)
13.
NEXT MEETING
DATE AND COMMISSION AGENDA: Monday, May 9,
2005.
14.
ADJOURNMENT:
Note: The meeting
facility is accessible. If you need any
disability-related accommodations, please contact City Staff at (310) 458-8701,
or TDD Number (310) 458-8696 at least three days in advance. All written
materials are available in alternate format upon request.
Santa Monica Blue Bus Lines #2, #3, and #8 serve City Hall. Parking is available on the south side of City Hall.
CITY LANDMARKS COMMISSION
Roger
Genser, Commission Historian and
Chairperson
Nina Fresco,
Chair Pro Tempore
REQUESTS TO SPEAK on an item must be submitted on a speaker’s request form and submitted to the Commission staff. All requests to address the Commission on agenda items must be submitted prior to the Commission’s consideration of the item. Items not identified on the agenda as public input or as a public hearing item generally require approval of 2/3 of the Commission to allow public comment.
CONSENT CALENDAR items will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion unless a Commission requests discussion on an item. If such a request is made, the item will be heard after the balance of the Consent Calendar has been voted upon.
PUBLIC HEARING PROCEDURES on each public hearing item include presentation of a staff report; Commission question of staff; a five minute presentation by the project applicant or application proponent, if any; Commission questions of the applicant or application proponent; three minutes each for each member of the public wishing to speak to the item; three minutes for project application or application proponent rebuttal; Commission deliberations and decision.
PRESENTATIONS BY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC should begin with the speaker stating his or her name and address followed by a statement regarding the item under consideration. Please speak to the Commission as a whole.
Professionals appearing before the Commission should clearly identify their status, such as “attorney,” paralegal,” “architect,” “designer,” or “landscape architect.” Instances of misrepresentation of professional status may be referred to the City Attorney for possible prosecution.
LETTERS OR WRITTEN MATERIALS regarding agenda items may be submitted to the Commission staff prior to or at the meeting; written materials submitted at least eight days in advance of the meeting will be included in the Commission’s meeting packet. Materials submitted after the deadline may be difficult for the Commission to adequately review.
ASSIGNING OF TIME for members of the public wishing to speak on an item is permissible within specified limits. A “representative speaker” may be allowed one additional minute of speaking time, to a maximum of five additional minutes (hence, eight minutes total) for each person actually in attendance who assigns his or her right to speak via a request to speak form to the “representative speaker.”
ACTION BY THE LANDMARKS COMMISSION on most matters occurs with the affirmative votes of at least four Commissioners.
APPEALS of certain actions of the Commission may be heard by the City Council. For specific information on appeals, please contact the Commission staff.
For more information regarding the Landmarks Commission
agenda, please contact the Commission staff in the
Planning Division at (310) 458-8341.
- - No Smoking in Facility - -
F:\CityPlanning\Share\Landmarks\AGENDAS\2005\04-11-2005 Agenda.doc